Fred Mueller

compared to what? far quieter than my D700 for instance which was a wedding photog. fave in its day I don't actually think of it as being a particularly loud DSLR ... average would be my ...

wow! lotta $$ locked up there and nothing past 200mm ... that's what's weird to me I'd dump the 24-70 g, 24-120, 70-200 (f4, or 2.8), one of the wide zooms, and your least used primes, and pick up ...

except there is nothing missing on my 750 compared to my 700 that actually requires menu diving ...

I prefer the Sony sensor that is in there now ... 8-10 fps and a 50 shot RAW buffer would be nice

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/58201159

you can print anything you want any size you want ... it's just a question of how much resolution do you need for an image to be successful at a normal viewing distance and remember that as the ...

nikkor 35mm - O is a great lens ... lots of flare if you are not careful but a great look to the image

all true - but having little to do with making a great photograph - in my day job I am a recording engineer at Berklee College in Boston - I can tell you with confidence almost all of the great...

all kinds of comments will pop up about how later designs are optically better than these old D lenses - and that may be true in some narrow technical sense - but all these older D lenses can make...

your "myth 1" analysis is rife with errors ...

you'd be really hard pressed to make the argument that the 24 mpx sensors in either the 610 or the 750 would limit anyones photographic efforts in any significant way ... you can just print larger ...

I've got a 750 and a 700 ... hard to answer your question for shooting commercially and just generally, hands down the 750 because 25 mpx is really the current sweet spot, and the low light ability ...

The answer is yes ... the 750 51 point system is faster and more accurate and light sensitive than the 39 pt system for both screw drive and more recent AF-S lenses.  Some of the old AF-D lenses ...

there is something about the look of the files that come out of the D700 that is just great ... it's got nothing to do with something you can measure ... I know the resolution is low and the D ...

Typically your end result shots need to feature parallel and exactly vertical verticals ... how you get there is up to you. There are a number of ways to achieve this ... and the most restrictive ...

Certainly going to be a great camera for action and general use ...

Just from what I can see here, I'd still go for my 750 for file quality that is just a little bit better all around ... but...

everybody knows the mode dial is "not professional" ... here is another dirty brilliant little 750 secret ... when you justgottaget the shot and you are tired and can't think anymore - on a 750 ...

I have a Nikon L39 (UV) filter and then the HN-3 screwed into that ... no vignetting. Really like this little lens - has a very photographic quiality.

Aye but ... essentially the people who buy and use a D5 to make fantastic images aren't going to be bothered by, or even necessarily aware that there is some big problem with dynamic range at base ...

Not "back in the day" - currently own and still shoot a D700, as well as a D750 and a D600  - all three bodies having nearly  60,000 clicks ... Professionally I shoot Real Estate - about 40 ...