aramgrg

Joined on Nov 19, 2013

Comments

Total: 414, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

zubs: DXO mark Samsung S7 Edge 88 points. Where is it on the list??
Hmm, I smell an apple

Especially when it was the new champion of their ranking when announced.

Link | Posted on Sep 23, 2017 at 17:23 UTC

Pixel 2 is on the corner though...

Link | Posted on Sep 23, 2017 at 17:18 UTC as 24th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

CameraLabTester: Just confirms my RayBans™ came along handy on those crucial moments...

.

No, it just says you overpayed for RayBan ;)

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2017 at 01:53 UTC
On article iPhone X vs. Samsung Note 8 (370 comments in total)
In reply to:

aramgrg: Years back companies were advertising megapixels. It took a while untip people understood that megapixel means nothing. Now it's apertures. That 1.7 tells exactly nothing, unless you specify area of the projection, a.k.a the sensor size.

Who cares about the shutter speed staying the same, I want to know the total amount of light gathered, and f1.7 is not telling me anything. LG advertises f1.6 on V30, and every youtube video is mentioning that, without realizing that it gathers less light than f1.7 of samsung.

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2017 at 17:36 UTC
On article iPhone X vs. Samsung Note 8 (370 comments in total)

Years back companies were advertising megapixels. It took a while untip people understood that megapixel means nothing. Now it's apertures. That 1.7 tells exactly nothing, unless you specify area of the projection, a.k.a the sensor size.

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2017 at 14:24 UTC as 80th comment | 4 replies

Lol, If you want to buy a lens and choose this kind of tool, you'd better forget photography. Expect something "I clicked all the photos with beautiful girls, and it recommends me 85mm. Can I get girls with that lens?"

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2017 at 20:10 UTC as 55th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Poweruser: At that price point I´d rather look into a used Macro lens. There are plenty and AF is not useful for macro work anyway.

Whereas OIS is invaluable

Link | Posted on Sep 7, 2017 at 06:48 UTC
On article Should you upgrade to a Nikon D850? (663 comments in total)
In reply to:

aramgrg: Upgrade from D500... WTH? That's a camera for totally different audience. Good that we don't get an "Upgrade from KeyMission 360" page.

Again, they are different cameras in different segment. Otherwise Nikon would just shut down the crop line. Some people need that camera only for the cropped mode and they crop even further. In that case, why would you ever pay more for the corners that you don't need? Ask wildlife pros, most don't care about price, but they care even less about FX that has smaller AF coverage and slower fps.

Link | Posted on Aug 28, 2017 at 21:10 UTC
On article Should you upgrade to a Nikon D850? (663 comments in total)

Upgrade from D500... WTH? That's a camera for totally different audience. Good that we don't get an "Upgrade from KeyMission 360" page.

Link | Posted on Aug 28, 2017 at 02:18 UTC as 82nd comment | 4 replies
On article Should you upgrade to a Nikon D850? (663 comments in total)
In reply to:

aramgrg: Target audience for D850 are pros, the article is written for wealthy grandmas

@James Bligh
Totally agreed. The point I was trying to make in OP was to tell that pros know whether they need the upgrade or not, while this article essentially explains that touch screen is better than non and 4k video is better. That might be useful to those people who have no other BETTER way to spend that $3300. I definitely do, no matter how much I make.

Link | Posted on Aug 28, 2017 at 02:14 UTC
On article Should you upgrade to a Nikon D850? (663 comments in total)
In reply to:

aramgrg: Target audience for D850 are pros, the article is written for wealthy grandmas

Everybody that has extra $3300 laying around, please paypal me at aramgrigory gmail.com

Link | Posted on Aug 28, 2017 at 01:30 UTC
On article Should you upgrade to a Nikon D850? (663 comments in total)

Target audience for D850 are pros, the article is written for wealthy grandmas

Link | Posted on Aug 27, 2017 at 23:15 UTC as 95th comment | 10 replies

Dear D850, welcome to Dpreview! It is going to be hard for you here.

Link | Posted on Aug 24, 2017 at 15:52 UTC as 85th comment
In reply to:

pawn: I read that each sunspot is larger than earth. Based on the image (and my eyes), ISS is larger than a sunspot. Is this because ISS is much closer to us?

What? Bigger than earth? They fit my binoculars!

Link | Posted on Aug 22, 2017 at 04:31 UTC

Pretty random photos, to be honest. Only the elephant is a good one, and yeah the first drone picture as well.

Link | Posted on Aug 19, 2017 at 19:41 UTC as 29th comment
In reply to:

aramgrg: Canon is slowly moving to high-end and super low-end only markets. It has nothing to say to enthusiasts.

chair

Link | Posted on Aug 16, 2017 at 21:46 UTC

Canon is slowly moving to high-end and super low-end only markets. It has nothing to say to enthusiasts.

Link | Posted on Aug 16, 2017 at 19:42 UTC as 61st comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

aramgrg: Glad I'm out of Canon's sinking ship and don't face the decision now.

Same Planet, 2017. Olympus's 4x smaller sensor has better DR, btw. See you in 2020, in a different boat.

Link | Posted on Aug 13, 2017 at 22:28 UTC

Glad I'm out of Canon's sinking ship and don't face the decision now.

Link | Posted on Aug 13, 2017 at 19:39 UTC as 60th comment | 3 replies
On article Canon EOS 6D Mark II Review (1106 comments in total)
In reply to:

aramgrg: This camera is a disaster. RIP Canon.

Except every past Canon was slightly better than predecessor in all aspects, especially image quality. People usually complained about not realized expectatiins. First time I see new model being worse in DR and high ISO at the same time.

Link | Posted on Aug 8, 2017 at 17:53 UTC
Total: 414, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »