aramgrg

Joined on Nov 19, 2013

Comments

Total: 464, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Does sensor size still make a difference? (1053 comments in total)
In reply to:

aramgrg: "Even though a larger sensor may be able to produce a better result, smaller sensors are getting better and better all the time"
Better than what? Large sensors get better at the same speed.

Than a sentence "sensor technology got better to a point where small sensors are good enough" would make more sense. The way it is written in the text and the heading makes the article look more like yet another troll's thread from m43 forum, at least to me.

Link | Posted on May 30, 2018 at 10:07 UTC
On article Does sensor size still make a difference? (1053 comments in total)

"Even though a larger sensor may be able to produce a better result, smaller sensors are getting better and better all the time"
Better than what? Large sensors get better at the same speed.

Link | Posted on May 28, 2018 at 17:58 UTC as 218th comment | 4 replies

So Samyang isn't here yet?

Link | Posted on May 10, 2018 at 17:58 UTC as 1st comment

Wow! Very nice!

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2018 at 21:45 UTC as 153rd comment

Let me grap couple of those while they are dirt cheap.

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2018 at 05:45 UTC as 103rd comment
On article Video: Canon shows off its new 120MP APS-H CMOS sensor (218 comments in total)
In reply to:

aramgrg: NEW? I don't know where they got this from(maybe stolen from crashed alien craft?), but they show of this since 2010! http://global.canon/en/news/2010/aug24e.html

sure, in 2010, they only had a print, now they made a video :)
They'll make a video on 250mp in 2023.

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2018 at 22:07 UTC
On article Video: Canon shows off its new 120MP APS-H CMOS sensor (218 comments in total)

NEW? I don't know where they got this from(maybe stolen from crashed alien craft?), but they show of this since 2010! http://global.canon/en/news/2010/aug24e.html

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2018 at 19:24 UTC as 63rd comment | 4 replies

"At F1.8 aperture is not the largest, but ... the sensor is still capable of capturing around 20 percent more light than most rivals"
That's a wrong statement. Focal ratio is not telling anything about aperture size. Aperture is the largest here is absolute size.
As I said before, smartphone companies take advantage of uneducated market and advertise focal ratios as the amount of liggt gathered, without telling the actual sensor size. Before it was MP misconceptiin, now it's aperture...

Link | Posted on Mar 27, 2018 at 20:04 UTC as 41st comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Mastering Light: Within 2 years Canin will have 30-60% of FF mirrorless market share. That means Sony will lose at least 30%.

Canon already is beating Sony is lens sales for pro sports use because Canon makes the best lenses. A good number of Sony us were will dump Sony because they already use Canon lenses instead of the Sonys.

Pro sports and action shooters do need IBIS because the lenses have IS.

And Canon clearly is smarter than Sony for involving the best pros from day one. Sony can't even make a weather resistant camera properly nor one with a decent grip and controls. Nor can Sony figure out color science. Their latest sample pics showed just how bad they make people's skin tones look.

Wow, a time traveler from 2019. Can you please post some photos of the mirrorless share chart and some of the future fuji lenses please?

Link | Posted on Mar 25, 2018 at 15:50 UTC
In reply to:

aramgrg: According to photozone, this has 4EV vignetting in the corners. Being f2.8, this lens is nearly useless for night time work.
http://www.opticallimits.com/fuji_x/1037-laowa9f28

How noticable it is? Haha try to shoot milky way at f11 and compare. That's what 4 EV is. Even if it is gradually going there, 4EV way to much. Most primes of that category are around 2EV, still very noticeable.

Link | Posted on Mar 23, 2018 at 15:55 UTC
In reply to:

aramgrg: According to photozone, this has 4EV vignetting in the corners. Being f2.8, this lens is nearly useless for night time work.
http://www.opticallimits.com/fuji_x/1037-laowa9f28

If I had to crop out the edges(big part of it actually), then I'll take my samyang 12mm f2 instead

Link | Posted on Mar 23, 2018 at 07:35 UTC

According to photozone, this has 4EV vignetting in the corners. Being f2.8, this lens is nearly useless for night time work.
http://www.opticallimits.com/fuji_x/1037-laowa9f28

Link | Posted on Mar 23, 2018 at 02:20 UTC as 11th comment | 6 replies

Exciting to see it outperforms a9! If this is not a "star eater", I'll get one.

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2018 at 16:13 UTC as 108th comment

Red lenses, matte cameras. Is this a paint company, or camera? Leica, begin innovating again, preferably in camera/lens market.

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2018 at 17:46 UTC as 106th comment | 2 replies

M line is couple of years behind the competition. There are no high end optics from canon on that line, just couple of consumer grade lenses. With this rate, canon goes to the same place as Kodak

Link | Posted on Mar 5, 2018 at 16:48 UTC as 125th comment | 1 reply

6D instead of 6d mark ii. That is telling something about Canon...

Link | Posted on Mar 1, 2018 at 05:59 UTC as 126th comment | 3 replies

Canon is actually not too bad, except for cameras...

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2018 at 05:16 UTC as 85th comment | 2 replies
On article Canon introduces EOS Rebel T7 with updated 24MP sensor (107 comments in total)

"Canon removes i from T7i to get rid of excess supply of body parts left from t3i."

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2018 at 05:10 UTC as 39th comment

Aperture size with no sensor size info gives no info. This is dpreview, not a random youtuber review, please update that info at least.

Link | Posted on Feb 25, 2018 at 23:31 UTC as 20th comment | 4 replies

Very nice write-up. Best article in a while. Thanks DpReview.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2018 at 22:35 UTC as 32nd comment
Total: 464, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »