aramgrg

Joined on Nov 19, 2013

Comments

Total: 272, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Sony shoots prices with 1.4X teleconverter.

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2016 at 02:12 UTC as 39th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

bubblyboo: Is Alien Skin Exposure another term for X-Trans?

Foveon? Is the one that transfers any food look like rice indoors? Brown rice, btw.

Link | Posted on Sep 27, 2016 at 22:09 UTC
On article DJI goes portable with the Mavic Pro (137 comments in total)

Mavik has it [karma]!

Link | Posted on Sep 27, 2016 at 22:03 UTC as 47th comment
On article Photokina 2016: Hands-on with Olympus OM-D E-M1 II (663 comments in total)
In reply to:

aramgrg: Now Oly says it is 15fps. Hmmmm...
http://www.getolympus.com/us/en/e-m1-mark-ii.html

"Keep in mind it was you who made the false claim that the difference was less between 1'' and m43rds sensor size and m43rds to APS-C. I find that also pretty interesting to then switch subjects :-)"
I never made such a statement. I know math. And yes, your experience about 1" sensor doesn't mean much. My experience was a little bit different. I used early gen 12.3 mp 4/3 sensors in Pens, after which rx100 was much better. Now I don't say they are as good as m43, but to some audience that's a small difference. To compare the difference I made an analogy with FF/APS-C, which you somehow read incorrectly and continue pushing.

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2016 at 06:02 UTC
On article Photokina 2016: Hands-on with Olympus OM-D E-M1 II (663 comments in total)
In reply to:

aramgrg: Now Oly says it is 15fps. Hmmmm...
http://www.getolympus.com/us/en/e-m1-mark-ii.html

Pretty interesting, M43 users start talk about size differences, when someone talks about 1" sensor... Never dare to mention FF/m43 ratio though

Link | Posted on Sep 23, 2016 at 14:04 UTC
On article Photokina 2016: Hands-on with Olympus OM-D E-M1 II (663 comments in total)
In reply to:

aramgrg: Now Oly says it is 15fps. Hmmmm...
http://www.getolympus.com/us/en/e-m1-mark-ii.html

The difference between sensor sizes of M43 and Nikon 1 is less than bw FF and APS-C btw.

Link | Posted on Sep 23, 2016 at 04:37 UTC
On article Photokina 2016: Hands-on with Olympus OM-D E-M1 II (663 comments in total)
In reply to:

aramgrg: Now Oly says it is 15fps. Hmmmm...
http://www.getolympus.com/us/en/e-m1-mark-ii.html

Ok, thanks. That makes sence.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2016 at 01:24 UTC
On article Photokina 2016: Hands-on with Olympus OM-D E-M1 II (663 comments in total)

Now Oly says it is 15fps. Hmmmm...
http://www.getolympus.com/us/en/e-m1-mark-ii.html

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2016 at 00:38 UTC as 27th comment | 21 replies
On article Photokina 2016: Hands-on with Olympus OM-D E-M1 II (663 comments in total)

Is grip adding 2 more batteries, or you need to remove the internal one to attach the grip?

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 14:34 UTC as 112th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

aramgrg: Why in the world people pay these humongous premiums for 0.79 crop? I don't understand that. To tell the clients that the cameras are crazy expensive maybe?

I completely take the "feel" being different" argument. I have bought fuji x series over Sony a7 for the same reason. But if the camera is every bit as electronic as any FF in the market, then I don't really see a slight jump in sensor size worths it.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 18:44 UTC
In reply to:

aramgrg: "The FUJIFILM GFX 50S mirrorless digital camera will feature the new FUJIFILM G Format 43.8 x 32.9mm sensor with an astonishing 51.4MP resolution"
That's not "astonishing" in 2016, Fuji.

MF is in general either studio or landscape. Since studio shooters are more than professional landscapers, I went with studio. And yes, it will be silly to write a studio camera in press release. It's definitely not a street photog's camera though

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 18:38 UTC
On article Miser's Macro: Olympus 30mm F3.5 Macro sample gallery (38 comments in total)
In reply to:

teh herp3r: As everyone here seems to be talking about "equivalent apertures," I would say that the ability to have the DoF equivalent to an F7 lens while still getting as much light as an f3.5 lens is great. I currently use the D610 and the 105mm f2.8g, while being an awesome combination for its image quality, has a very shallow Depth of field. I would say the biggest disadvantage of m43 against 35mm right now is its noise performance, but that is something that will improve over time.

but you can close the aperture to f7, bump up iso and get 3.5 dof and noise of m43. m43 guy cannot open the aperture though

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 18:31 UTC
In reply to:

aramgrg: "The FUJIFILM GFX 50S mirrorless digital camera will feature the new FUJIFILM G Format 43.8 x 32.9mm sensor with an astonishing 51.4MP resolution"
That's not "astonishing" in 2016, Fuji.

Really? taking street photographer with x-pro to studio with medium format?
I believe those markets are very apart from each other.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 17:34 UTC

If the announced 1EV improvement is anywhere close to be real(I'll accept 2/3 as well), than this camera is a game changer.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 17:32 UTC as 131st comment
In reply to:

aramgrg: Why in the world people pay these humongous premiums for 0.79 crop? I don't understand that. To tell the clients that the cameras are crazy expensive maybe?

He talks in a way that both are very affordable. Of course, if one doesn't care about money, then yeah, go for it. It will make you see the "un-seen" and "get inspired".

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 16:56 UTC

"The FUJIFILM GFX 50S mirrorless digital camera will feature the new FUJIFILM G Format 43.8 x 32.9mm sensor with an astonishing 51.4MP resolution"
That's not "astonishing" in 2016, Fuji.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 16:46 UTC as 87th comment | 4 replies

Why in the world people pay these humongous premiums for 0.79 crop? I don't understand that. To tell the clients that the cameras are crazy expensive maybe?

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 16:41 UTC as 91st comment | 5 replies

12 FPS with 42MP. Now that's impressive, dear Canikon.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 13:42 UTC as 186th comment | 1 reply

"...Canon should have released at least two years ago, when Dual Pixel AF was first introduced in the EOS 7D II, "
FYI, DPAF was introduced in 70D

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2016 at 14:08 UTC as 298th comment
On challenge Mir-1B (5 comments in total)

The most pathetic first place I will ever win :-)

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 13:21 UTC as 1st comment
Total: 272, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »