Lives in Australia Sydney, Australia
Works as a Senior Researcher - Canon Australia
Joined on Jul 17, 2004
About me:

Canon 1D X, 5D III, 17-40 f/4L, 45 f/2.8 TS-E, Sigma 50 f/1.4 Sigma 85 f/1.4, 135 f/2L, Canon 100 f/2.8L IS macro, 70-200 f/2.8L IS mk II, 300 f/2.8L IS, 100-400 f/4-5.6L IS, 500 f/4L IS mk II, 1.4x TC III, 2x TC III, 600 EX, Sigma 24 f/1.8 EX, Canon 24-7 f/2.8 mk II, Sigma 150 f/2.8 Macro EX HSM DG


Total: 1430, showing: 161 – 180
« First‹ Previous7891011Next ›Last »
In reply to:

technotic: No popup flash == no sale. Close Naikon, close.

Yes it's a convenient feature but really you think this is a deal breaker? Canon's never offered pop-up flash on a full frame and we buy a tiny 270EX flash unit that is way way better than any pop-up flash and only weighs 100g. If the camera is more ruggedly sealed lack of pop-up doesn't worry me.

Link | Posted on Jul 28, 2017 at 02:08 UTC
In reply to:

Mateus1: Looks smaller = lighter. Maybe 0,7kg?

BTW, would you like to have D850 with 50iso native or with better 12800iso?

Clearly both, but most of all I want the DR to improve at least 1EV from ISO 400 to ISO 12800. As someone that also does wildlife and surfing you are often at ISO 400-1600 and by then the DR advantages are gone.

Link | Posted on Jul 28, 2017 at 02:05 UTC
In reply to:

NickyB66: Understandable, if it keeps people, aircraft safe then I don't see a problem.

Check the stats, TSA has never ever prevented a terrorist attack. All smoke and mirrors. How many exploding cameras you heard of.

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2017 at 11:52 UTC

Photographers who fly frequently in the US may want to finally come to their senses and choose a much nicer place to visit.

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2017 at 11:50 UTC as 47th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

TonyPM: Will it have a normal cmos full frame sensor or will they go BSI? 42mpx, maybe more.? Doesn't really matter as long as it is as good as the older model but better.

It will be superior in DR and high ISO noise, resolution unknown but rumored to be 45-46MP, so not the A7RII sensor. It may be their own design like the D500 sensor, but of course fabbed by Sony and using Sony tech. I hope it's an EXMOR design.

Link | Posted on Jul 26, 2017 at 22:33 UTC
On article Ten things we're hoping for from the Nikon D850 (482 comments in total)

1) greater emphasis on QC
2) On sensor PDAF
3) 42-50MP
4) 8fps FX, 10fps DX (20MP), 12fps 1.3x DX (12MP)
5) D5 AF
6) 4K from 6K capture
7) ISO 50-51200 Native, ISO 25-102400 expanded. No one cares about ISO gazillion
8) Full touch screen capability for menus, and LV
9) Hybrid OVF + EVF
10) 1/320 X-sync
11) Dual card (XQD or CFast 2)
12) 6s RAW buffer at full res (48 shots)

Link | Posted on Jul 25, 2017 at 07:49 UTC as 152nd comment
In reply to:

A Owens: Only 1:2? And the size! Undoubtedly a fine lens but still.

It's a close focusing portrait lens IMO, I'd never buy a 1:2 lens as a "macro" lens, but if I was into portrait this would be nice. For FF, my favourite macro FL range is 135-180mm, working distance is king.

Link | Posted on Jul 25, 2017 at 02:05 UTC

So under $1K 77D camera gets a sensors that blows this away at low ISO. As a Canon users I'm simply gobsmacked and disgusted they would foist this garbage on us in 2017 when they all but assured us they have moved to on-chip ADC for all sensors. I'm so glad I needed the AF capabilities of the 5D4 and wasn't waiting expecting big things from 6DII. Add to that no 4K and no joystick despite 45 AF points, I'd buy a D500 or E-M1 II over this let alone it's FF competition. Wow A7III and D760 will kick the living stuffing out of this in most areas.

Good one Canon nice double shot gun blast to your own head.

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2017 at 05:16 UTC as 351st comment | 1 reply
On article Astrophotography with the Sigma 14mm F1.8 Art lens (79 comments in total)
In reply to:

LDunn1: Excellent to see a comprehensive review of this lens espeecially with its strong slant towards nightscape use. Many thanks for taking the time & trouble to do this for the community.

The section on Vignetting and lens flare I've had to read multiple times, & I still 'don't get it' though. specifically these comments:-

"On site, it was apparent how much brighter the image at F2.8 appeared on the LCD screen compared to the one shot at F1.8" &

"the image at F2.8 is 27% brighter than the one at F1.8 due to the effect of vignetting"

I don't understand this at all. an image taken at f1.8 should be brighter than one at f2.8, for the same iso & shutter speed/duration. The sample photos don't seem to support these statements to my eyes either, with the f1.8 shots being brighter. Maybe I am missing something.

However, apart from the above it was great, I particularly appreciated the focus on coma, as this is often a weakness with this sort of lens & night sky work.

Many thanks!

Also some fast lenses are actually a little slower than stated. It may be closer to f/1.9 than f/1.8 based on how they rounded the aperture, then combine that with heavy vignetting.

Link | Posted on Jul 19, 2017 at 09:42 UTC
On article Astrophotography with the Sigma 14mm F1.8 Art lens (79 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kabalyero: My Samyang 14mm f/2.8 is now crying in envy...but on a more serious note...thank you for the well rounded review. Looking forward for the aurora sequences! Cheers bro!

Have a look at the Samyang Pro 14 f/2.4 , looks excellent for astro work and doesn't have the incredible distortion of the f/2.8.

Personally given the poor light gathering of a 14mm lens due to tiny entrance pupil I'd rather use a 24 f/1.4 or 35 f/1.4 and a tracker; these lenses capture ~ 5x and 10x more light at the same exposure. Use higher ISO but stack multiple shots for clean final output.

Not saying I would like a fast UWA as well, but I think taking into account price, weight and performance the Samyang 14 f/2.4 would be my choice. Realkly hate the size of these latest art lenses. This is where mirroless can be a huge advantage as seen with the Sony 12-24 being a half the size and weight of the Sigma 12-24. Trouble is Sony's latets firmware is called the star eater and many people won't use Sony for their astro work anymore.

Link | Posted on Jul 19, 2017 at 05:53 UTC

Well I for one find this very fun and creative work. Not usually into this sort of stuff, but they made me smile and cudos for a fresh take on man made patterns.

Link | Posted on Jul 17, 2017 at 00:30 UTC as 48th comment

The big news here is that Adobe actually have admitted a problem. Normally they deal with a problem like Trump does, deny deny deny and ignore ignore ignore. Too bad they won't fix some issues that have been pointed out with PS going back 5 years or more, they'd rather delete accounts of those highlighting those issues on the Adobe forums if they make too many complaints

Link | Posted on Jul 11, 2017 at 22:18 UTC as 75th comment | 6 replies
On article Review: Nikon D7500, speed and capability (524 comments in total)

Given the D500 on special is often only a few hundred more than the D7500, unless you are really tight for money and if you were you wouldn't even be buying this camera, I'd get the D500 anyday. If offers many improvements that are worth the extra coin. If the AF were the same I would consider the D7500 more seriously as that's the best feature of the D500 IMO. D7500 is good, but D500 is another class for servo work.

Link | Posted on Jul 6, 2017 at 06:40 UTC as 85th comment | 1 reply
On article Review: Nikon D7500, speed and capability (524 comments in total)
In reply to:

ttran88: Have we moved throw back Thursday to Wednesday?

Keep those pearls coming trolltran, you sound more like a pathetic 12 year old trapped in his momma's basement every time you open your mouth. She should have listened to the doctor when he said "never let him go off his meds".

Link | Posted on Jul 6, 2017 at 06:32 UTC
On article Review: Nikon D7500, speed and capability (524 comments in total)

Nikon offers 4K but no on sensor phase detect, Canon does not offer 4K but has on sensor phase detect. Can these two please get together and offer a complete solution. Canon's FHD is rubbish, it might be rated 1080p but it's actually closer to 700p. Nikon is only useful for static subjects unless your DoF is so great focus is not critical.

Assuming 7D3 ever comes out, it'll probably still stick to worst FHD but have best LV AF around. With D820 about to be announced, will Nikon on soldier on with antiquated CDAF in a flagship DSLR?

Link | Posted on Jul 6, 2017 at 03:25 UTC as 92nd comment | 5 replies
On article Review: Nikon D7500, speed and capability (524 comments in total)
In reply to:

ttran88: Have we moved throw back Thursday to Wednesday?

Ignore trolltran88, he goes into every single thread trying to be a smart a$$. Might have been funny the first few times, after several thousand attempts it's long beyond a pathetic cry for help.

Link | Posted on Jul 6, 2017 at 03:20 UTC
On article Sony a9 banding issue: fact or fiction? (735 comments in total)

It's not a really a Sony issue, but going forward LED lighting will eventually dominate and this issue won't be limited to a few instances at sporting events. Hopefully there will be a industry wide discussion to see what can be done to minimise the effects of this. More and more cameras will be fully electronic, so whether anything reasonably can be done to mitigate or eliminate this effect I'm not sure. Is there something the LED manufacturers can do in the way the LED's are driven that might help?

Link | Posted on Jun 30, 2017 at 00:35 UTC as 143rd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

eazizisaid: Brace for Canon's fanboys : 11mm is worth the 1000$ more !

More like brace for the insecure Sony fantroll. No one has said such a thing, but if that makes you feel better good on ya.

Link | Posted on Jun 29, 2017 at 12:32 UTC
On article Canon unveils ultra-compact EOS Rebel SL2 / EOS 200D (112 comments in total)
In reply to:

beavertown: When will Nikon put the articulate screen to their D3xxx? Not only that but the Dual Pixel AF for live view.

Nikon would have to invent DPAF first or license it, which won't happen. They need to act fast, with D820 coming soon it would be a joke to see flagship camera with antiquated CDAF for video.

Link | Posted on Jun 29, 2017 at 06:20 UTC

Yikes screen dots 104000, that's an order of magnitude error dpreview

Ok even if you don't want to shoot 4K, here's why Canon must offer it; their 1080p is the second worst on the market, only Pentax is worse for video quality. The pixel binning Canon do results in about actual res of 700-750p, it's mushy crap. The only way to get good 1080p from Canon is to resample 4K. To think that adding 4K to this camera would impact on 5D4 is ludicrous. Why offer DPAF which makes video shooting so much nicer, when the video quality blows chunks.

Rest of the camera is as expected, I always said it would use 80D AF, would only have 1 SD slot and still stick to the pathetic UHS-1 standard. The worst gripe other than no 4K, no 1/8000 shutter and still USB 2. I can only imagine that Texas instruments if they are the ones still making digic for Canon are incapable of incorporating it in their chip. Given they can't offer good video codecs either, Canon needs to look elsewhere IMO.

Link | Posted on Jun 29, 2017 at 06:12 UTC as 47th comment | 9 replies
Total: 1430, showing: 161 – 180
« First‹ Previous7891011Next ›Last »