rrccad

Lives in Canada Canada
Joined on Jul 5, 2012

Comments

Total: 2970, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Canon EOS M100 review (773 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jefftan: Look at the EF-M lens lineup
Canon don't care about it and no Sigma support

Even the ultrawide (big reason for going mirrorless) start at 11mm not 10mm

just for the lens lineup would choose A5100
APS-C E-mount, FE mount, Sigma
there is a lot of lens choice

seems you are unaware of this entire sub-thread.

go back to the sony forums.

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2017 at 17:17 UTC
On article Canon EOS M100 review (773 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jefftan: Look at the EF-M lens lineup
Canon don't care about it and no Sigma support

Even the ultrawide (big reason for going mirrorless) start at 11mm not 10mm

just for the lens lineup would choose A5100
APS-C E-mount, FE mount, Sigma
there is a lot of lens choice

oh stop whining. not anyone else's fault other than your own that you can't grasp the subtle nature of the english language to realize that this entire thread was about a topic that you somehow decide to imagine it differently.

go back to the sony forums, you know.. your safe spot. since you can't handle reading out here.

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2017 at 16:46 UTC
On article Canon EOS M100 review (773 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jefftan: Look at the EF-M lens lineup
Canon don't care about it and no Sigma support

Even the ultrawide (big reason for going mirrorless) start at 11mm not 10mm

just for the lens lineup would choose A5100
APS-C E-mount, FE mount, Sigma
there is a lot of lens choice

how often does a sony fangirl keep on distorting the facts and quoting out of context when they have clearly lost the plot and are decidedly wrong in their comments?

this entire subthread was to do with the lenses available to the M100. give it up.

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2017 at 16:37 UTC
On article Canon EOS M100 review (773 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jefftan: Look at the EF-M lens lineup
Canon don't care about it and no Sigma support

Even the ultrawide (big reason for going mirrorless) start at 11mm not 10mm

just for the lens lineup would choose A5100
APS-C E-mount, FE mount, Sigma
there is a lot of lens choice

oh good grief. sony fanboys can be so obtuse.

not to mention I was responding to your comment:

@ Ebrahim Saadawi
"Sorry, please tolerate that 10mm vs 11mm difference"
Given that Sony APS-C has a 1.5 crop factor, Canon APS-C has 1.6, this is looking at 15mm FOV on Sony APS-C vs. 17.6mm on Canon, which makes it a significant and very noticable difference.
Just saying."

which had everything to do with the lens discussion.

you're being an idiot and once again, quoting out of the context of the thread.

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2017 at 15:53 UTC
On article Canon EOS M100 review (773 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jefftan: Look at the EF-M lens lineup
Canon don't care about it and no Sigma support

Even the ultrawide (big reason for going mirrorless) start at 11mm not 10mm

just for the lens lineup would choose A5100
APS-C E-mount, FE mount, Sigma
there is a lot of lens choice

crop factor is most certainly a lens particular when you are trying to make a point on equivalent focal lengths.

are you that dense?

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2017 at 14:59 UTC

i'ts also $2700 with each lens costing $1300 ea.

I would hope it's competitive with the best crop cameras out there.

Link | Posted on Nov 9, 2017 at 22:57 UTC as 27th comment | 1 reply
On article Canon EOS M100 review (773 comments in total)
In reply to:

Najinsky: My dear Sony fanpersons, trolls, shills, or however it is you like to be addressed.

It seems you are unaware that an ILC camera requires 2 elements to become a photo-taking machine. One is the body, the other is a lens.

You repeatedly post on these threads for other cameras saying, just buy a Sony Axxxx with pancake lens.

Did it ever occur to you that many have considered this option and rejected it?

Perhaps you are not well acquainted with actual lens performance, so let me help you out. Please see the graphic on this post:

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/60346738

If you are not a graphics kind of person then let me express it in words.

Put a pancake lens on a Sony and you get image recording performance almost on par with an RX100.

Put a pancake on an EOS-M and you get image recording performance approaching that of a midrange DSLR with an 'L' Lens.

When Sony learn how to make compact lenses that perform like good lenses, I may reconsider. But for now, its rejected.

canon's "us too" M5/M6 are quite ergonomically superior to the sony cameras their relative category.

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2017 at 14:03 UTC
On article Canon EOS M100 review (773 comments in total)
In reply to:

Najinsky: My dear Sony fanpersons, trolls, shills, or however it is you like to be addressed.

It seems you are unaware that an ILC camera requires 2 elements to become a photo-taking machine. One is the body, the other is a lens.

You repeatedly post on these threads for other cameras saying, just buy a Sony Axxxx with pancake lens.

Did it ever occur to you that many have considered this option and rejected it?

Perhaps you are not well acquainted with actual lens performance, so let me help you out. Please see the graphic on this post:

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/60346738

If you are not a graphics kind of person then let me express it in words.

Put a pancake lens on a Sony and you get image recording performance almost on par with an RX100.

Put a pancake on an EOS-M and you get image recording performance approaching that of a midrange DSLR with an 'L' Lens.

When Sony learn how to make compact lenses that perform like good lenses, I may reconsider. But for now, its rejected.

someone needs a soother and a nap, not to mention DXO lens scores? someone needs a clue as well.

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2017 at 00:34 UTC
On article Canon EOS M100 review (773 comments in total)
In reply to:

Najinsky: My dear Sony fanpersons, trolls, shills, or however it is you like to be addressed.

It seems you are unaware that an ILC camera requires 2 elements to become a photo-taking machine. One is the body, the other is a lens.

You repeatedly post on these threads for other cameras saying, just buy a Sony Axxxx with pancake lens.

Did it ever occur to you that many have considered this option and rejected it?

Perhaps you are not well acquainted with actual lens performance, so let me help you out. Please see the graphic on this post:

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/60346738

If you are not a graphics kind of person then let me express it in words.

Put a pancake lens on a Sony and you get image recording performance almost on par with an RX100.

Put a pancake on an EOS-M and you get image recording performance approaching that of a midrange DSLR with an 'L' Lens.

When Sony learn how to make compact lenses that perform like good lenses, I may reconsider. But for now, its rejected.

come on .. that's not fair. don't make them cry.

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2017 at 19:02 UTC
On article Canon EOS M100 review (773 comments in total)
In reply to:

pacnwhobbyist: Only sort-of let down is that I think this camera should’ve included a hotshoe so it at least gives you the option to use the EVF. I suppose Canon thought that would’ve jeopardized sales of the M6. Otherwise it looks like a great camera.

would have increased the size and weight.

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2017 at 14:29 UTC
On article Canon EOS M100 review (773 comments in total)
In reply to:

PankajDubey: See the comparison chart and buy A6000 :D

sure if you miss the entire point of the article and realize why and what dpreview is talking about.

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2017 at 14:23 UTC
On article Canon EOS M100 review (773 comments in total)
In reply to:

pacnwhobbyist: Only sort-of let down is that I think this camera should’ve included a hotshoe so it at least gives you the option to use the EVF. I suppose Canon thought that would’ve jeopardized sales of the M6. Otherwise it looks like a great camera.

actually it's a more prosaic reason. the hotshoe wouldn't fit on the body.

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2017 at 23:16 UTC
On article Canon EOS M100 review (773 comments in total)
In reply to:

justmeMN: It's mildly ironic that the first Canon M to get a DPR Gold Award is their bottom-of-the-line model. For the target audience, they totally nailed it. I suspect that some enthusiasts will buy it too, as an additional "fun camera".

you got stats to back that up?

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2017 at 21:14 UTC
On article Canon EOS M100 review (773 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jefftan: why would anyone buy in EF-M system?

1 no 4k
2 bad sensor IQ in noise and dynamic range
3 bad lens system, no 3rd party Sigma support like Sony
4 no in body IS like Olympus/Panasonic

A5100 better buy than this, look at the recent Samyang 16mm F1.4
where is such a lens for EF-M?

why do sony fangirls feel so threatened by other cameras?

are you taking over from pentaxians?

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2017 at 21:10 UTC
On article Canon EOS M100 review (773 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jefftan: Look at the EF-M lens lineup
Canon don't care about it and no Sigma support

Even the ultrawide (big reason for going mirrorless) start at 11mm not 10mm

just for the lens lineup would choose A5100
APS-C E-mount, FE mount, Sigma
there is a lot of lens choice

is english a second language to you? You quoted from me, out of context. that wasn't hard to figure out was it? at the time this sub-thread was discussing lenses in particular the 11-22 UWA.

EF-M's .. implies lenses, we were discussing lenses. it's really not that hard.

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2017 at 21:06 UTC
In reply to:

walker2000: Who is going to fill the gap? Sony, Canon, or Apple?

Canon's still there. probably good enough.

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2017 at 21:05 UTC
On article Canon EOS M100 review (773 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jefftan: Look at the EF-M lens lineup
Canon don't care about it and no Sigma support

Even the ultrawide (big reason for going mirrorless) start at 11mm not 10mm

just for the lens lineup would choose A5100
APS-C E-mount, FE mount, Sigma
there is a lot of lens choice

my language is just fine.. your quote out of context was certainly not.

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2017 at 18:19 UTC
On article Canon EOS M100 review (773 comments in total)
In reply to:

Woodyz: Why should I buy this over Sony E/FE and Fuji X?

too hard to read the review?

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2017 at 17:02 UTC
On article Canon EOS M100 review (773 comments in total)
In reply to:

Aaron801: The comparison chart lacks a column for viewfinder. I feel like that's a pretty important thing...

or perhaps you should consider the target market which dpreview pretty carefully explains.

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2017 at 16:33 UTC
On article Canon EOS M100 review (773 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jefftan: Look at the EF-M lens lineup
Canon don't care about it and no Sigma support

Even the ultrawide (big reason for going mirrorless) start at 11mm not 10mm

just for the lens lineup would choose A5100
APS-C E-mount, FE mount, Sigma
there is a lot of lens choice

Ralf .. how the f is DR any variable on a lens?

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2017 at 16:00 UTC
Total: 2970, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »