archerscreek

The Fred Miranda forum has an 800 PF image thread with some 2x TC images posted. https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1753250/70 I tried to link to page 71, the one with the most recent 2X TC ...

How would you compare the (bare lens, no TC) image quality of the 400 f/4.5, the 600 f/6.3, and the 800 f/6.3 on subjects that more or less filled the frame at the respective distances for that to ...

People always tout versatility as one of the best attributes of a zoom lens, but I think one of the best things about a zoom like this is that it will show you where you might want to spend money ...

Perhaps I am not the only one who thinks it’s odd that when the 100-400 S first came out all of these reviewers raved about how sharp it was throughout its entire range and even stated that it was ...

I’m switching. LC was roughly $126/year vs $90/year for the discounted Capture One Pro. I initially chose LC because the masking seemed to work much better. However, after the recent update C1 got ...

That’s the same attitude they had regarding their DSLR line when movement in the industry started shifting towards mirrorless. I even recall reading numerous quotes like yours, their DSLR cameras ...

Great to see continued success. And hopefully, all the people that keep saying Nikon’s imaging division is only a small part of what Nikon does will stop saying that after seeing the breakdown graph.

Yeah, it looks like a nice lens and seems very reasonably priced compared to Nikon’s 7 plus pound $9500 120-300 f/2.8 F mount zoom. I would be intrigued by a Nikon 300 f/2.8 TC, but I doubt it ...

I looked at four other lesser known authorized Nikon dealers in the US and Nikon’s own US store and three of the five also had it in stock and immediately available. If someone wants this lens, ...

You see that as a virtual tie? Because it looks to me like the PF is noticeably better, both in the center and off to the sides. And the PF is dealing with a higher ISO as well. If I had two ...

Yeah, I saw that lens come up in the late spring I think, along with the 800 PF. Both had what I would consider significant discounts and I somewhat regret not pulling the trigger. The PF was ...

Congrats and enjoy. I’m sure I’m not alone in my interest in seeing more from this lens. So please check back in and share your impressions of it. Thanks!

Just checked on Thursday, 2:39 pm EST. In stock and ready to ship. I did not order one , but I am curious to see how well it performs and may in the future.

Yeah, I recall Canon sports shooter, Jeff Cable, took two R5 bodies along with the R3 to cover the Olympics because he liked the higher megapixels.

I was out a few days ago and had been standing still in the cold for a few hours. Nothing was around so I decided to shoot a dead tree 25 yards away. I was at 1/3200. With VR on I shot a few ...

Assign a custom button to go to My Menu. Have that take you to the top of your list and open the selection automatically. Place subject detection at the top. When you press the custom button, it ...

Frankly, after seeing the test results, I can see why some 200-500 owners said their copies of the older F mount 200-500 lens was better than the new 180-600 they had just received and thus had ...

Wow! Congrats to you. After my initial preordering experience a few years back, I said that was it, no more preordering Nikon stuff. And since then, watching so many stressing out over shipment ...

Haha. Are you kidding? There are still people whining and blaming Nikon for their choice of order location. It will never end. But congrats on your decision and the results that came of it.

I think Nikon priced the lens higher than what many expected because Nikon knew they could sell off all of the early production lenses and then drop the price and keep selling the PF at a healthy ...