Richandhiscat

Exactly. And the EM1X may be a loss leader, but the features it hopefully will have and demonstrate when applied to the rest of the range may (hopefully again) invigorate that range. For all we ...

"As people were commenting" Now your imagining things to justify your action. Right, I won't discuss this with you, because after that load of verbal diarrhea, with your consistent denial that you ...

"With wildlife you often need to stop down to get sufficient dof, even with m4/3. Try it sometime" How convenient of you to leave that quote of mine out. "As you said above, 'I've seen many FF ...

What are you on about? What has getting a smaller lens (cheaper, but inferior glass and slower) for their cameras to do with sensor size? Why do you say that the best m43 lens's (40-150 f2.8, 300 ...

With a worse performance, which is what they don't want. And no matter what way you try and twist it, all FF lens's are far larger than m4/3 equivalents. Oh, and before you start, don't go on about ...

I do tend to agree with you, but you are putting too much emphasis on body size. I've seen many FF wildlife set ups this year, and it's the lens size that grabs my attention, not the body.

That's brilliant. Reminds me of the Blackadder sketch where Baldrick thinks he's seen a horse with two heads.

I took a few shots there, and on one I've succeeded in photoshopping the cable and pole out. Unfortunately, one of the things that adds to it is not good - the smoke is due to a wildfire that ...

Well, we only have rumours, and according to one rumour there are two more bodies to come. And don't forget on size, we still have far smaller and lighter lens's.

Funny you should start this thread, I was thinking of doing exactly the same! Here's a before and after Lightroom: We were staying on Lewis, and the sky was magical, perfectly clear. There was a ...

But it does! Read the Pro film differences. The Epson differences - pigment ink, higher resolution etc. The Olympus differences - weather sealing, faster aperture etc. Try one for image quality. I ...

I made a light hearted comment, with an exclamation mark, agreeing with you that it's odd, and you took it seriously...... Nobody said it did !!! Once again, nobody said it did . I will repeat, it ...

Epson Stylus Pro. I rest my case,m'Lord.

Cross purposes here, I was replying to amateurs (like myself) buying equipment because it said 'Pro' on it, not professionals. Which is odd I agree, because in car terms 'L' is normally the base model!

I find that argument insulting. I bought my two Oly Pro lenses to get better results not to impress anyone. So what do you want to call a higher spec range…."Super Duper" ? You don't know that it ...

But they are buying 'Professional' equipment in that the specs enable the user to simply get results they would struggle to, or simply couldn't (poorer optical quality, no weather sealing etc ) ...

Not had a chance to do a real test, but tried tracking focusing on a stationary object (tall grass heads in the garden against a dark background, at 20m and with the Oly 12-100) and then moved ...

"which can easily be done to your smartphone or table"

I transferred photo's to my table, but it was fiddly, I had to get them printed first....

I hope that isn't a reference to my post where I asked what this sensor was, and commented on the fact that at 20mp it was m4/3 size.

Thanks for that. Might try Hilary at the butchers, he tends to sell 'Special Stuff' :-O