ProfPS

One addition: don’t go with the small Ona case - It may look like a more urban alternative to the regular small bags but it it slightly too small for the V and scratches the rubber on the viewfinder.

It isn’t most practical but short of using the camera without a case at all, it’s the fastest solution for spontaneous shots.

This is not that kind of forum, is it?

Not really - it takes less than a second to fold back the top part, and it detaches for more serious use.

No, I think the cutout is to allow the leather to neatly wrap around the camera.

I have the Gariz full case, which technically isn’t a pouch but can work as one. The fit & finish are OK but not exceptional, so not really worth the excessive price - but better than the ...

I have an R5 and like it but in feel and use, it's just as much a computer taking pictures as a Sony Alpha. For the experience, it doesn't come close to a Fuji IMO.

Basically, even with the pro cube the bag isn’t very stiff and puts most of the back contact on the spine, which grows very warm, and even with the optional waist straps, the load is all on the ...

Carrying a camera in its own padded case or shell inside or outside a dedicated hiking pack could be clumsy, depending on what you bring and how you shoot. I would never go with a pack that ...

Must have been quite the customisation!

Massive improvement in IS and solves a bug that led to unsharpness when continuous drive modes were used in combination with AFC.

Canon has been working on this fix from before the 100-500 was released, as this was the firmware that was announced in the footnote to the documentation of the previous firmware.

Just installed and did an initial quick test - servo AF continuous low, which is one combination that led to significant blurring before, is pin sharp.

v1.1.1 repairs stabilisation of the R5 with the 100-500, when used in continuous drive modes.

IBIS and continuous drive modes (EFCS or mechanical shutter) is not yet a reliable combination when the R5 is paired with the 100-500, at least, my % of blurred shots is much higher than I would ...

R5 / 24-70 f2.8

Going against the grain here - probably yes, once I've confirmed I'm happy with the AF speed and tactile feel of the aperture and focus rings.

R5 / 100-500 (crop)

Sorry - tongue in cheek - just happy my 100-500 made it into the first batch.

Looks pretty, doesn't it? R5 / 35mm f1.8