Lives in United States Boston, MA, United States
Works as a Pixel Cleaner
Has a website at http://EnticingTheLight.com/
Joined on Dec 30, 2008
About me:

Plan? What plan? I just press the shutter and pray to St Ansel.


Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4
In reply to:

qwertyasdf: on the grounds of the never ending equivalence debate, really interested in knowing how many photographers use large aperture to gain shutter speed? and how many to control DOF?

I personally think that high shutter speed is only crucial to sports photography, and that the m43 system is not a good sports photography tool to start with.

I do street photography mainly, with an APS-C camera and a 31mm f/1.8 lens. I try to stick to apertures no wider than f/2.2 because otherwise the DoF becomes too shallow. With m4/3 I can shoot with the Panny 20mm f/1.7 wide open without having to worry about my DoF not being deep enough, *and* I get faster shutter speeds.

Not everyone is obsessed with razor-thin DoF.

Link | Posted on May 23, 2012 at 03:40 UTC
On article Pentax announces K-01 K-mount APS-C mirrorless camera (866 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: Pentax is different AGAIN. I see inert thought of people, inert reactions,
real xenophobia to brave moves and thoughts...

The main task was to make K-01 unusual. Marc Newson could make it.

The main thing - nobody are indifferent to K-01. Either like, or dislike.
It means - the work of M.Newson is the artwork.

And that's going to help sell K-01 units, how? It's not museums who buy cameras, it's people, people who want a camera that delivers the goods.

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2012 at 13:55 UTC
On article Zeiss Apo Sonnar T* 1700 mm F4 lens (14 comments in total)

It doesn't have a tripod mount. Fail!

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2012 at 14:18 UTC as 12th comment | 2 replies
On article Sigma 105mm F2.8 EX DG Macro now available (94 comments in total)
In reply to:

xmeda: Get Pentax 100/2.8 WR macro instead.. cheaper and better. Stabilization is provided by body, so lens design does not have to deal with two more added IS elements.

In-body stabilisation is practically useless at macro distances, as are most in-lens IS systems. The benefit of the Pentax is being smaller and lighter due to the lack of IS, as well as easier to design because of it. But if you shoot Canon, Nikon, Sony... then it doesn't matter what benefits a Pentax lens has, no? :-)

Link | Posted on Jun 29, 2011 at 21:34 UTC
Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4