HarrieD7000

Lives in Netherlands Utrecht, Netherlands
Works as a Retired technician
Joined on Aug 26, 2011
About me:

Amateur Photographer with the ambition to learn everything about photography.

Comments

Total: 119, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

I see, some could have done it better, but they don't show their results. This photo is great, and to my knowledge a first in this proportions. Great job, nice result. Creative mind and a tough job.

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2015 at 06:45 UTC as 56th comment | 1 reply

It must be a h..k of a camera, but no matter what focal length, out of reach for me.

Link | Posted on Jun 3, 2015 at 05:09 UTC as 13th comment
On a photo in the Nikon 300mm f/4E PF ED VR Samples Gallery sample gallery (5 comments in total)

Could have been staged, could be photoshop, or just a lucky shot. For me it does not matter, I like it very much.
Coming on the end of the whole series, I like most shots, independent what camera was used. This lens end on my wish list.

Link | Posted on May 13, 2015 at 09:10 UTC as 3rd comment
On photo WH09_ISO200_f4.0_FX in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (5 comments in total)

Could have been staged, could be photoshop, or just a lucky shot. For me it does not matter, I like it very much.
Coming on the end of the whole series, I like most shots, independent what camera was used. This lens end on my wish list.

Link | Posted on May 13, 2015 at 09:10 UTC as 3rd comment
On article The effect of pixel size on noise (113 comments in total)
In reply to:

Stanny1: Wow, just think how bad a little 4:3 sensor is!

The size if a APS-C sensor is about 40 % of the full frame. The size of a Four thirds is only 26 % compaired to the full frame.
To get a 3 times 2 picture you only use 23 % compaired to the FF.
15 % less Then a APS-C looks not much, but absolute between the APS-C and the Four Thirds camera, you again loose about 40% light.

Link | Posted on May 4, 2015 at 08:17 UTC
In reply to:

HarrieD7000: The Transcend cards transfer RAW on my cam, for more than a year now. It is not done with a monster speed, but it works. The jpg files are transfered with more than a gigabyte a second to my iPad. 4 and iPhone.

You are right. I made a mistake it should be 1 mega byte a second. Sorry for that error. And respect you saw it. I think it is to late to change the error now.

Link | Posted on Mar 15, 2015 at 05:01 UTC

The Transcend cards transfer RAW on my cam, for more than a year now. It is not done with a monster speed, but it works. The jpg files are transfered with more than a gigabyte a second to my iPad. 4 and iPhone.

Link | Posted on Mar 13, 2015 at 06:16 UTC as 16th comment | 2 replies
On photo Sigma24mmF1.4_samples-04-F1.4 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (3 comments in total)

Great sharpness, good separation from the back ground. Bokeh could be better, but for a 24 mm it is great.
I hope all camera manufactures will be triggered to improve their lenses for a reasonable price, now the bigger sensors are demanding ever sharper glass.

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 16:34 UTC as 1st comment
On a photo in the Sigma 24mm F1.4 DG HSM Art Initial Samples sample gallery (3 comments in total)

Great sharpness, good separation from the back ground. Bokeh could be better, but for a 24 mm it is great.
I hope all camera manufactures will be triggered to improve their lenses for a reasonable price, now the bigger sensors are demanding ever sharper glass.

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 16:34 UTC as 1st comment
On article Happy Holidays from dpreview (125 comments in total)

Merry Christmas to DPreview, staff, and all visitors of the site. Keep up the good (photography?) spirits.
Tanks for everything you all.

Link | Posted on Dec 26, 2014 at 05:36 UTC as 49th comment
On article Nikon D750 Review (2019 comments in total)
In reply to:

Frank C.: dumbed down piece of photographic equipment for 2k$+... I don't think so! 1/8000 and 1/250 x-sync was around decades ago, srry today it's fuel injectors, not webers! LOL

My camera has 1/8000 but between the 30K shots I took last years I could not find one I took at that speed. And with my SB-900 I can use my flash up to 1/8000 of a second, but who needs that?

If you don't like a Nikon, please don't show it this way.

Link | Posted on Dec 24, 2014 at 21:29 UTC
On photo D750-DSC_0466-ISO_320.acr in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Great, even with 20 mm just a little depth of field. This is what I like from a FF camera. This is why I more and more start liking the D750.

Link | Posted on Dec 6, 2014 at 21:49 UTC as 1st comment
On a photo in the Nikon D750 Samples Gallery sample gallery (1 comment in total)

Great, even with 20 mm just a little depth of field. This is what I like from a FF camera. This is why I more and more start liking the D750.

Link | Posted on Dec 6, 2014 at 21:49 UTC as 1st comment

I do use he V700 for 5 years now, and I'm pleased about the result. I know I should not expect more than 2000 dpi when scanning negatives, but with SilverFast 8.1 Ai pro, I get very good results. Everyone is pleased when I show what can be made from an old picture or an old negative.
The 800 and 850, do have the same scaner, only the fluorescent light is replaced with LEDs, giving it a faster startup and perhaps a longer life?
For scanning negatives I should have bought a Nikon coolscan, when they were new, because now they cost twice as much. That would have been an investment.

Link | Posted on Dec 5, 2014 at 12:46 UTC as 12th comment
On article A second glance: two takes on the Leica X (403 comments in total)

I think it so a good camera, and will last for many years, but as an amateur I can't afford $ 2300 for a APS C camera. I'll use that money to buy a decent FF camera, on wich I can use my lenses. I can't make better pictures with another camera, but I think in detail my pictures will win from this camera.

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2014 at 09:49 UTC as 88th comment

Now it looks they can copy Apples marketing style, I hope they at least can bring something in Apple quality.

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 05:16 UTC as 571st comment
In reply to:

RolliPoli: I don't think these should be called "film scanners". They are flat bed scanners on which film can be scanned. Especially from a miniature format like 35mm, sharp, high quality results are best made with a dedicated film scanner. Unfortunately, there aren't many left on the market.

You are right. On my V700 I cant see the difference between scans from the films when I use 2400 dpi or I use more. 3200 dpi will give bigger files, but no extra detail in the result.
For my 6 by 6 negatieve the 2400 dpi is more than enoug, and the results are brilliant.
I have looked for real film scanners, but if you see one, second hand, they ask twice the price they costed new. For an amateur like me these prices are too high.

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2014 at 03:49 UTC

This is a nice interview, only giving us things already known.
No firm can afford to tell in advance, what the next new and news breaking product will be. An innovation, in the electronic world is easy copied by other firms. Those firms then can bring a cheaper version, because they did not need to do the research.
And every time, Nikon brings an "innovation" on the camera or lens market, only sales decide if it was good or bad. That is also the drive for more or less development to the way they go.
Listening to customers is nothing more then looking what sells the best. Not reading this forum. This forum, only can hint the development devision in a direction. But the decisions for what path to go, are made on the top, and they do look more to sales figures and look if it fits in the strategical path they are going. Not more no less.

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2014 at 12:04 UTC as 24th comment | 1 reply
Total: 119, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »