alffastar

Lives in United States Sofia, United States
Works as a SAP Technical Consultant
Joined on Apr 16, 2009

Comments

Total: 21, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »

The fact that 12-32 and 35-100 are updated means that GM7 will have IS!

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2015 at 08:52 UTC as 12th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

ianp5a: It's a good thing that CSC makers are offering powerful firmware upgrades. Keep it up Olympus and Fuji etc.

Lots of things to like. Focus Bracketing/Stacking especially. And you can now customise and save the control panel (SCP). (Finally)

BarnET - one thing that stopped me from buying GX7 is eye recognition during focussing! I think Panasonic could have added this through FW

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2015 at 11:37 UTC
On article Panasonic reveals Lumix DMC-GF7 with tilting LCD (81 comments in total)
In reply to:

.Sam.: Hmmm... the GM1 proved impossibly hard to use without the rear wheel, and it was corrected with the subsequent model, GM5. Now Panasonic comes out with a NEW camera, repeating the problem ?

The wheel on GF7 is different to the one on GM1 (look at the pic in which the both cameras' backs are side by side in the hand on article)! It is like on the LX100 in my opinion. I have owned both GM1 and LX100 (recently sold GM1 to buy GM5) and can tell you that the wheel on GM1 was one of the reasons to sell it - just terrible. Where as the wheel on LX100 is great - deffinitely usable to change settings!

Link | Posted on Jan 20, 2015 at 16:23 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 Review (1001 comments in total)
In reply to:

artbarn: I recently bought the LX100 and am really pleased with it.. but can anyone tell me why, when i go into the DRIVE mode selector, my panorama selector is greyed out?

Because you shoot in RAW. Has to be only jpg. I have setup custom 1 for jpg+panorama and custom 2 for jpg+HDR :)

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2015 at 08:28 UTC
On article Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II: a quick summary (533 comments in total)

Here are some samples
http://cweb.canon.jp/camera/dcam/lineup/powershot/g1xmk2sp/expression/index.html

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 15:04 UTC as 99th comment | 1 reply
On article Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II: a quick summary (533 comments in total)

Oly never made a micro 4/3 lens with 24-120mm equivalent and 2.8-4.0. Even if Oly makes such a lens it will cost more than this camera and will be both bigger and havier, so I am definitely buying this Canon to use it as everyday camera and also travel camera and will use only my primes with my OM-D!

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 13:32 UTC as 107th comment | 4 replies
On article Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II: a quick summary (533 comments in total)

This camera is exactly what I have been waiting for! Something between RX100II and RX10 - big sensor, at least one stop brighter lens than RX100 on the long end, at least one stop brighter lens on the short end than RX10. In addition, great range, touch screen that is not fixed and size that is bigger than RX100 but not too big! Excellent!

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 12:34 UTC as 115th comment
On article Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II: a quick summary (533 comments in total)
In reply to:

Samuel Dilworth: The lens specs are scarcely believable!

• image circle almost as large as before
• twice as bright as before, while roughly the same collapsed size
• 14 elements in 11 groups, with a record 6 groups independently moving (previously 11 elements in 10 groups, with 4 moving groups)
• internal focusing for faster and closer focusing (previously rear-element focusing)
• close focusing down to 5 cm (previously 20 cm)

This is very much a case of Canon showing who’s the optics boss, after all.

(Which is just as well, since that old sensor isn’t going to boss anyone!)

Thanks a lot! This is great news as the close focus distance on the long end was one of the big show stoppers with the first G1X for me. Now 5cm-40cm is totally acceptable!

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 12:28 UTC
On article Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II: a quick summary (533 comments in total)
In reply to:

Samuel Dilworth: The lens specs are scarcely believable!

• image circle almost as large as before
• twice as bright as before, while roughly the same collapsed size
• 14 elements in 11 groups, with a record 6 groups independently moving (previously 11 elements in 10 groups, with 4 moving groups)
• internal focusing for faster and closer focusing (previously rear-element focusing)
• close focusing down to 5 cm (previously 20 cm)

This is very much a case of Canon showing who’s the optics boss, after all.

(Which is just as well, since that old sensor isn’t going to boss anyone!)

Where have you read about the close focus on the long end?

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 11:37 UTC
In reply to:

G3User: What a joke, all these cameras with no view finders. You may as well be holding up a cell phone with your head tilted way back and barley seeing the screen in bright sunlight. This is pathetic. This is the continued dumbing down of photography.

What a joke your comment is

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 04:43 UTC

What an amazing camera this seems to be!!!

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 04:42 UTC as 82nd comment
On article Is Instagram 'debasing photography'? (291 comments in total)

These types of articles and opinions are really absolutely meaningless! If people are using instagram than there is reason why they do it and this reason is fun and quick way to make something interesting of your shot. How many instagram users really care about 'creativity' and photography the way the author of the article does? This attitude leads to nowhere - just accept the fact, try to understand why and do not try to push in peaoples faces narowmindness or niche kind of thinking, no matter how correct it may be! As I am sure that mass production of producing shoes dimished the handcraft of making shoes and how many people in the world would REALLY care about this fact?

Link | Posted on Jul 19, 2012 at 20:29 UTC as 182nd comment
In reply to:

Tee1up: I hope DP does a review update...I really want this camera to work but I don't want a $1200 ulcer.

@Kaushik Parmar, I like video of X100 - it is really great, however, there is now way to manually focus during video and the auto focus is not good, so focusing is a real problem for me when shooting video...

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2012 at 07:34 UTC
In reply to:

Tee1up: I hope DP does a review update...I really want this camera to work but I don't want a $1200 ulcer.

I have it and it works just fine from day one (10 months ago). Now with firmware 1.20 ( and 1.21 that fixes 1.20 :) ) the autofocus is much better than I bought it. Wonderful camera - my only camera for over a year. I wonder if I will replace it with a micro 43 camera, but this camera has got everything except: nice auto focus during video (no manual focus either), stabilization for video, lens option for portraits of my daughter. Thats about it. Otherwise everything else combined makes for the the best compact camera on the market - VF, lens, high ISO, jpeg quality etc

Link | Posted on Apr 6, 2012 at 09:20 UTC
In reply to:

Ray Sachs: Still not the ideal way too handle auto ISO, but a big improvement over how it was. And the raw button programmability and ND toggle are awesome new features. Overall a very positive upgrade.

I think I know what you mean by 'not the ideal way to handle auto ISO, but I think that although it would have been nice to have ISO AUTO ON/OFF along with ISO values that are assigned to Fn Button, it does not make much sense. I think so, because it is not EITHER an ISO value OR auto ISO ON/OFF, but rather an ISO value AND auto ISO on/off. They compliment each other, as the ISO value becomes the lower limit of the auto iso range. In this way it will not be logical to have options in same menu that compliemt each other instead of options that exclude each other!

Link | Posted on Mar 22, 2012 at 07:43 UTC
In reply to:

Digitall: After a year of its release, is that Fuji launches this update? I think we are giving too much importance to the cameras, much more than their manufacturers? For they are just another product. And we even have created a cult camera.The world is a very strange...

But it's the only world we've got, so embrace the strangeness that is not harmful :)

Link | Posted on Mar 22, 2012 at 07:31 UTC

Astounding :)))

Great update!

I also discovered that when changing a setting with a button (not in the menu) and then confirming with the shutter button, the annoying focusing does not happen, just the confirmation of the value!

Link | Posted on Mar 21, 2012 at 23:17 UTC as 47th comment
In reply to:

(unknown member): Who cares about scratches and fingerprints? I care about drop resistance, water resistance and dust resistance!
Portable drives travel - are they travel proof?!

There is a rugged case, http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=640

Link | Posted on Mar 21, 2012 at 09:05 UTC
In reply to:

Superka: That's a great time to shoot video!
Those who cares about drop resistance... don't drop it! Or put a sock on it and you'll get your resistance. Put two socks for extra mountain-climbing resistance.

There is a rugged case, http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=640

Link | Posted on Mar 21, 2012 at 09:04 UTC
On article Hands-on with the Olympus OM-D E-M5 (207 comments in total)
In reply to:

ingram98ab: Nobody seems surprised that Daniel Craig appeared in the samples... is he a regular in DPreview's Hands-on reviews??? Or photographers just dont care??

That's not Daniel Craig :) Daniel Craig is in much better shape than this guy, which is quite normal, keeping in mind he is shooting next Bond.

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2012 at 07:29 UTC
Total: 21, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »