chile7236

Bionic963: I bought the X-T3 18-55 kit on Amazon about a week ago for $1699. I am very seriously considering return it and going with the a6600. When I was trying to decide between the X-T3 vs the a6400, what won me over was the dedicated headphone jack on the XT-3. Now that the a6600 has it's own headphone jack, plus a viewfinder that does selfie mode, plus a huge battery, plus IBIS ... I think it would be best to go for the a6600.

Checat: As an A9 user, it should be for me as a second body? No way with this buffer and single (slow) slot. Still, I think this is the best family camera. It will track kids great, HLG makes it easy to record movies. It is small without too many dials. Sony marketing department is calling it flagship just to grab “dentists” attention ;).

Marximus: It must be exhausting always looking for Canon stories as an opportunity to disparage and insult the brand/specs. Perhaps you guys should go outside and do more shooting with your superior cameras. I say this as the owner of an a6400 and an a7 III. I've held on to my 7D II for the longest of any of the serious cameras I own, and I think I'd be plenty satisfied with trading it in for a 90D (which, granted, would probably be my last DSLR, mainly for wildlife). Apart from many of the other improvements, the battery life is very impressive to me. 1300 shots is almost double the CIPA rating of the 7D II.

Georgeee: Thought Canon is going to focus on the RF mount. The resources there are stretch 3-4 ways at least( EF), EF-S, R ,M, same engine though. If mirrorless is the direction, then
RF, M are ones. How big is the 90D market?

TomCodyPleasedToMeetYa: Am I the only person who thinks the children of the photographers should not be used as models in these galleries? Nice gallery otherwise.

PerL: I am sure these are great lenses, but the soccer shots are nothing to write home about content wise. I believe DPReview has a sports photographer in the staff - they should probably have sent him and got a better judgement on how these performs vs the traditional similar lenses from Nikon and Canon.

chile7236: Why not shoot on other Sony camera bodies as well (l.e. A6400, a7iii, etc.)

chile7236: Why not shoot on other Sony camera bodies as well (l.e. A6400, a7iii, etc.)

Wu Jiaqiu: make it mandatory and linked to licensed users

Frank_BR: The main advantage of the smaller formats, and which is rarely mentioned, is that they are much better for sports and wildlife than full-frame. It's the kind of photography that needs super fast telephoto lenses. To see my point, compare a 300 mm F2.8 for M43 with a 600 mm F4 for FF. The difference in size and weight is enormous. Even a 600mm F5.6 lens (eq to 300mm F2.8 for M43) is heavy and difficult to handle.

By the way, anyone who criticizes the relatively large size of the OM-D E-M1X certainly did not understand that it is a camera designed to work with fast telephoto lenses, which are necessarily heavy, but not as much as the equivalents for FF .