villagranvicent

The end results which are the files it produces are nothing special. My mediocre $900 A7 can make the same shots.

My way to distinguish and judge cameras is usually checking prints. Why? because I trust more what I see than what tech graphs say, but you are right whatever makes anyone happy is valid.

Photography -just as any other art- would be extremely boring if everything was measured by technical charts. I enjoy my M8 very much, love its handling and love the look of the files its archaic ...

Agree $125 bucks is just a steal. My 50mm 1.4 USM auto focus motor just stops working so tomorrow I will take it to the Canon service center that fortunately is 10 minutes from my home. If the ...

They still go strong for good 3000 USD there are a few right now on ebay. The M8 can be found easily for half which is a steal!

I was thinking in getting a new X100F, but maybe I will try to find another mint M8 like mine just in case something goes south with one of them. I don't want to be out of CCD magic!

Oh, I remember these shots from your comparison! I guess which ones came from the M9, having the M8 I know the organic look :))

Classic click-bait title. The article has nothing to do with the XP2 vs D810. Anyone would know the D810 would give even better results all other factors being equal.

As bosjohn21 said, any 35mm eq finder will do. I have the Leica VF, yes the camera looks nicer but to tell you the truth it is only a gimmick. Pretty useless specially when close focusing. The ...

If you want clinically perfect shots that looks just like any other new full frame camera, then by all means get the M10. If you want files with character, more organic film-like (even with its ...

I share sh10453 opinion. While editing some raw files from my trip to Japan I thought processing them in BW and missing those amazing colors that are so characteristic would be a sin.

Olypent I read the description and still don't understand what is that for!
Did you check the only review? it has been marked as useful 60 times lol

Agree the Rokinons Cine lenses are basically the regular still versions with step-less aperture ring. They also have their $1500-$2500 range "Xeen" lenses which supposedly are better though.

The Arris... oh yeah. That is some serious piece of glass.

Well, besides the Leica Cine lenses they are a bargain indeed:

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1233351-REG/leica_lei_smlx_c_set_10_summilux_c_10_lens_set.html

@The Davinator

Seems like you didn't read what Marty said: "When camera makers release so few new cameras, DPReview is forced to do 8 or 9 articles for EACH one to create content.". That is why I...

With so many articles about this camera it seems already like "old news". Comparing 24mp vs 42mp cameras with so many evident differences makes no point at all.

The differences between these 2 cameras are so obvious that you don't need an article for that.

I can't find the 9 articles about the Canon EOS M6.

The best ever until Sony releases another 2 cameras in the next few months.