quintana

Nice to see my hometown featured in a sample gallery :)

And I also like the focal length very much. I often find 35mm too wide and 50mm too narrow and alternatives in between are scarce. Currently...

@Tommi K1: Why would I need a tripod for 100 Mpix if the output is only 25 Mpix?
If you have blur caused by camera shake in a 24 MP picture and you downsample it to 6 MP the effect is greatly...

True, but this is not useful in the field because movements (waterfalls, leaves in the wind etc.) cause artifacts. Plus you always need a tripod.

I'd love a 100 MP Bayer pattern X-H2 that has an output of 25 MP.

Why? Because then we would have full color information for any given pixel in the 25 MP oversampled end result, which currently...

Just imagine a FF Foveon with amazing Leica glass in front of it!

This would be the dream combo of many landscape and studio photographers.

I would take this over a medium format camera any day...

I've chosen the following: 16/1.4, 27/2.8 and 60/2.4 as a three prime kit. Why the 16/1.4? I mostly shoot landscapes, so the slow(ish) apertures of the 27mm and 60mm don't bother me much. But I ...

But with this app YOU can make his photos even better. I bet he'd approve!

Without useful gear for street photography.

IBIS and OIS don't work in combination. When you're using a lens with OIS then OIS is used instead of IBIS.

I don't expect any miracles either. The only thing I am curious about is the new native ISO 160 and how it performs versus the ISO 200 in the X-T2 in terms of how clean the images look and if it ...

I also switched from a Nikon (the D500) to Fuji and one thing that you also might want to consider is ergonomics. When coming from a DSLR with a big grip the somewhat smallish X-T3 just might not ...

This. And since I also came from a big DSLR (the Nikon D500) I didn't want to compromise on ergonomics, so while the X-T3 is certainly a very desirable camera it simply doesn't tick all the boxes ...

This is by far the least professional DPReview TV video that I've seen.

And I don't mean it as an insult. It was somehow nice for a change. Just don't do it like this on a regular basis. ;)

If it was four by three I wouldn't buy it.

I really wonder why Olympus and Panasonic stick to this odd ratio. Consumer cameras have been 3:2 way before digital cameras and almost nobody uses 4:3...

A FF Olympus would really be something!

I recently switched from Nikon DSLRs to a Fuji X-H1 and I am very happy with the system but if Olympus decided to go FF mirrorless I can only pray that...

It's reasonably close to the classic 135mm on Sony, Fuji and Canon mounts.
On MFT the focal length is a bit odd indeed.

OK, about that I'm not so sure. The dpreview video gave me the impression that this is always the case.

Very nice shot! The bokeh could be a bit smoother but for me it's easy to forgive the lens its (only tiny) flaws given the weight and size of it. It can also be picked up quite cheap on the used ...

I might have missed your point or I got lost in translation as I'm not a native speaker.

To me it would be almost always a problem since I rarely shoot bursts. This is what I meant.

Of course. But I rarely shoot bursts.