toni2

Joined on Jul 4, 2012

Comments

Total: 109, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

AF microadjust should be on EVERY DSLR, not only in pro cameras.

Link | Posted on Aug 31, 2016 at 13:54 UTC as 24th comment

Perhaps a marketing movement after Rni all films 4? Jeje

Link | Posted on Aug 13, 2016 at 10:21 UTC as 7th comment
In reply to:

justmeMN: A solution for a target audience that doesn't care about the problem?

The problem, with 99.99% of people using phone's camera is short perspective (selfies) and ugly photos that it generates.

Perhaps the fact is that you (and your upvoters) don't understand what is the problem.

Link | Posted on Aug 1, 2016 at 07:04 UTC

Jacques Henri Lartigue was using an analog 3d camera system in 1902.
In 2016 we have digital 2d camera system yet.
That's evolution in technology. hehehe

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2016 at 12:07 UTC as 2nd comment
On article The Canon that can: Canon EOS 80D Review (711 comments in total)
In reply to:

NicoPPC: the EOS 80D looks like a real good APS-C camera for all-rounder. It can do everything, with a great quality and a great handling.

Canon Lens, and Sigma pushing high quality Lens as well.

Well, the 550D is still enough to me. I might upgrade later if the 550D breaks. Or even later when the price will drop a bit.

Actually, I am more looking for news (good APS-C) lens as for new camera. As I fell the 550D is pretty mature, und fit mostly my needs.

Well, with the APS-C cameras getting more "pro" (well expensive!), manufactures like Canon and Nikon should make some EF-S L.

Have a great day

It's possible that someone hasn't got AF issue.
But for the other people that has got AF issue the best thing is to be able to correct that. Do not you believe it?

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2016 at 08:10 UTC
On article The Canon that can: Canon EOS 80D Review (711 comments in total)
In reply to:

NicoPPC: the EOS 80D looks like a real good APS-C camera for all-rounder. It can do everything, with a great quality and a great handling.

Canon Lens, and Sigma pushing high quality Lens as well.

Well, the 550D is still enough to me. I might upgrade later if the 550D breaks. Or even later when the price will drop a bit.

Actually, I am more looking for news (good APS-C) lens as for new camera. As I fell the 550D is pretty mature, und fit mostly my needs.

Well, with the APS-C cameras getting more "pro" (well expensive!), manufactures like Canon and Nikon should make some EF-S L.

Have a great day

Perhaps the first step needed for Canon and Nikon is to add micro AF on ALL their DSLR.

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2016 at 07:06 UTC
On article The Canon that can: Canon EOS 80D Review (711 comments in total)
In reply to:

toni2: Better dynamic range, finally!!

Only it notes that the dual pixel AF does not work through the optical viewfinder. hehehe

It's funny that some people don't have the ability to look far away. xDDD

But you are right about the DSLR future...

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2016 at 07:03 UTC
On article The Canon that can: Canon EOS 80D Review (711 comments in total)

Better dynamic range, finally!!

Only it notes that the dual pixel AF does not work through the optical viewfinder. hehehe

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2016 at 06:33 UTC as 119th comment | 2 replies

It's time to remove Nikon Dxxxx and Canon xxxD who don't have microAF from interchangeable lens camera sales. It should be FIXED lens camera sales, because if you change for a better lens perhaps you will get out of focus photos.
It's time for Canon and Nikon that they know what are selling.

Link | Posted on Apr 27, 2016 at 06:45 UTC as 58th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

toni2: Automated AF fine tune should be on EVERY DSLR, including the most basic models.
Musical instruments are tuned. Reflex cameras must be too.

It's the only way with a mirror: have an AF fine tune, or remove the mirror.

@MasterWayne
Canon will not be cheap. That's the only problem to sell an aps-c mirrorless with native EF/EF-S, EVF and dual pixel AF. It could be better than a lot of Canon DSLR. So, the problem is that Canon wants more and more money.
Any time it will be selling, but overpriced.

Link | Posted on Apr 26, 2016 at 06:12 UTC
In reply to:

toni2: Automated AF fine tune should be on EVERY DSLR, including the most basic models.
Musical instruments are tuned. Reflex cameras must be too.

It's the only way with a mirror: have an AF fine tune, or remove the mirror.

@badbob42mk1
The worst thing is the people who think that a DSLR can be sold without microAF. Speed is an added; but the accuracy is a basic thing. Remember it.

Perhaps sony af is not fast with mirrorless cameras, but you get in focus photos. That's all.

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2016 at 08:35 UTC
In reply to:

Akpinxit: Note to DP stuff : MagicLantern does provides fully automated Dot Tune future for Canon , which works just as described here for Nikon .

Yes, you can try Magic Lantern.
But Canon should add af fine tune on their firmware. It's about being a professional company, but it seems that they are only a commercial company.

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2016 at 18:09 UTC
In reply to:

toni2: Automated AF fine tune should be on EVERY DSLR, including the most basic models.
Musical instruments are tuned. Reflex cameras must be too.

It's the only way with a mirror: have an AF fine tune, or remove the mirror.

@MasterWayne
I mean that if Canon wants, they could add microAF in the official firmware at least from Canon 550d upwards. But they, as Nikon, prefer to sell DSLR with microAF focus problems. Yes they aren't professional cameras but they are reflex cameras; so they should not be toys.

Magic Lantern doesn't add the ability to adjust microAF to Canon cameras.

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2016 at 18:03 UTC
In reply to:

toni2: Automated AF fine tune should be on EVERY DSLR, including the most basic models.
Musical instruments are tuned. Reflex cameras must be too.

It's the only way with a mirror: have an AF fine tune, or remove the mirror.

And the worst is that at least from the Canon 550d it's possible to have micro AF. It's only a firmware thing. And a marketing thing, of course. Canon (and nikon, of course) prefer to sell cameras with focus problems that to solve the problem.
You buy an interchangeable lens camera, but it's better if you don't change the lens. hehehe

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2016 at 09:46 UTC
In reply to:

Akpinxit: Note to DP stuff : MagicLantern does provides fully automated Dot Tune future for Canon , which works just as described here for Nikon .

"this module does not add AFMA support to camera bodies that did not contain this feature in Canon firmware"

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2016 at 07:40 UTC

Automated AF fine tune should be on EVERY DSLR, including the most basic models.
Musical instruments are tuned. Reflex cameras must be too.

It's the only way with a mirror: have an AF fine tune, or remove the mirror.

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2016 at 07:32 UTC as 67th comment | 12 replies
On article Taking it easy: Canon EOS 80D shooting experience (296 comments in total)
In reply to:

toni2: Good ergonomics, speed, good DR, good dual-af... And an OVF? Nice if it had an EVF.

@RedFox88
Yes, buy a mirrorless or wait a couple of years. Mirror will die as the film died. It's only a question of time. You'll see it soon.

Link | Posted on Mar 25, 2016 at 20:18 UTC
On article Taking it easy: Canon EOS 80D shooting experience (296 comments in total)

Good ergonomics, speed, good DR, good dual-af... And an OVF? Nice if it had an EVF.

Link | Posted on Mar 24, 2016 at 19:40 UTC as 66th comment | 7 replies

Better DR -> checked.
EVF -> perhaps 90d?

Link | Posted on Mar 22, 2016 at 09:54 UTC as 101st comment | 7 replies
On article Canon announces budget-friendly EOS Rebel T6 (1300D) (885 comments in total)
In reply to:

Richard Franiec: Same ol' will bring more cash than any mirrorless could dream about. Not even talking lenses and future upgrades to higher end models.
As long as Canon and Nikon are most recognizable names in photo industry, they will play this game forever.

@Marty4650
Canon 750 doesn't have LCD display. 750 and 760 doesn't have microAF.
Canon 350 had LCD display. With 350 you can microadjust autofocus.
Canon is actually doing garbage. The only point is marketing. Yes I know they can do it a lot better, but actually they are playing with people.

Link | Posted on Mar 11, 2016 at 20:32 UTC
Total: 109, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »