Haider

Lives in United Kingdom Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
Joined on Oct 3, 2006

Comments

Total: 68, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »

Looks like a solid landscaping lens...

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2019 at 12:54 UTC as 23rd comment
On article Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Review (619 comments in total)

Shame about the removal of the off camera flash, I use an FL36R with the MK1...

Link | Posted on Nov 25, 2018 at 22:18 UTC as 19th comment
In reply to:

rvdzee: I don't understand all the dismissive remarks here. I have a Nexus 5X (Google's phone before the Pixel) and it is absolutely amazing in low light. When I need a picture of a group of people in a low-light situation (e.g. a restaurant), needing some some depth of field, this phone beats my 5DMII, A5100 and EOS R. And indeed, in other situations these cameras are far superior, but for these cases I seriously bring my phone as the preferred camera.

It's called jealousy...

Link | Posted on Nov 14, 2018 at 20:23 UTC
On article Photokina 2018: Hands-on with Panasonic Lumix S1R (653 comments in total)
In reply to:

Naveed Akhtar: it's sad to see Pany left its old buddy Oly out of this L mount partnership!

Personally I like the OM-D EM-10 size with the m.Zuiko14-40mm f2.8 and 40-150mm f2.8. If I'm going to carry a bigger camera/lens combo, I'd rather go with an MF sensor. That where I think Oly should have gone; brought out a compact mirrorless MF like 50S/X1d...

Link | Posted on Oct 1, 2018 at 09:32 UTC
On article Sony a7 III Review (2181 comments in total)
In reply to:

razorfish: It’s so pathetic (in the literal meaning of the word) that dpreview keeps using the term «full frame» about the 35mm sensor size. There is nothing «full» about this sensor size, it is just a remnant from the days of analogue film. Actually, the first time this term was used about a 35mm digital sensor was by Canon when they launched the original 1Ds, so it was a marketing ploy right from the beginning, and it is just sad that so-called objective review sites have bought into this.

Hahaha my Oly em10 is full frame! What they mean is it is 35mm sensor, right noobs!

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2018 at 10:15 UTC

Not really in to portraits, like 1 and 2. I suppose like any good art they make you take a long look...

Link | Posted on Nov 22, 2017 at 18:42 UTC as 70th comment | 1 reply
On article UPDATED: Sony a7R III is still a star eater (460 comments in total)
In reply to:

Greg VdB: Nice to see DPR covering this issue! It won't matter to most people, but the astro community (like that in DPR's Astrophotography Talk Forum) certainly values any pressure applied to Sony for them to provide a simple on/off function through firmware.
https://www.change.org/p/sony-remove-star-eater-en?recruiter=749374429

It matters because the camera does not have a raw mode.

Link | Posted on Nov 21, 2017 at 15:47 UTC
On article Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Review (619 comments in total)
In reply to:

(unknown member): Cons: "•16MP starting to look a little dated"

Because we are all buying into the marketing bs? Nope, having exhibited 36 x 24 inch prints in a London exhibition, produced from a 16mp sensor, I can honestly say that 16mp is a perfectly usable res. Don't buy into the marketing BS guys - 16 is plenty!

Hi Brendon,

For most casual photographer who display there shots on the web or print them off at 7x5, 16MP. I have about less than 1 percent printed at 8x10. The E10 is not a pro or even a pro-am camera. It's very much a consumer camera/beginners camera. It majors on smaller size total size (lens+camera). I would be happier with 8-10MP with the bump in low-light and dynamic range improvements the bigger photo-sites would bring coupled with smaller file sizes. If you need bigger print m4/3->APS->35mm->MF->LF depending on the red you want.

Link | Posted on Oct 29, 2017 at 13:18 UTC

Micro Four Thirds is full frame. The camera senor captures the full frame provided by the lens. I should not have to point out such elementary facts to a camera review site.

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2017 at 08:25 UTC as 6th comment | 7 replies
On article PIX 2015: An interview with Joe McNally (28 comments in total)

A real gent and a top draw photographer...

Link | Posted on Dec 28, 2015 at 10:39 UTC as 6th comment

I used to use G.Zuiko 35mm f2.8 prime also try the 40mm focal length something about that too...

Link | Posted on Dec 25, 2015 at 11:58 UTC as 12th comment
On article Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review (2257 comments in total)
In reply to:

cannotshoot: I don't why some of you are still buying crop cameras. This Leica T is so over rated. My sony rx1 is so much better and it stopped me from buying new cameras year after year.

3mm MILC and DSLRs are too big and bulky. I was looking to get a digital system for Oly OM-2n & Zuiko 24mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 35mm f2.8, 50mm f1.4. Never happened ended up with OM-D E-M10...

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2015 at 11:39 UTC
On article Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review (2257 comments in total)
In reply to:

LF Photography: As per usual, Leica delivers a decent camera in a quality case for a ridiculously overpriced amount of money, all of it surrounded in marketing hype and BS, and intended for the elite members of the "more money than brains" club.
Personally, I prefer to buy a DSLR that is actually worth the money spent on it. But than again, I'm not rich, so what do I know...

That's pretty much true across the board with DSLRs and MILC you can't just buy a new more modern digital back. Never had a Leica and don't really have the inclination to. From what I know Leica offer top draw lens. Lens last, as they can used by different bodies. So that's where I see the advantage of Leica. The best lens cost money on any system as the market for those lens is smaller so you're not going to be able 'stack'em high, knock'em cheap'.

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2015 at 11:17 UTC

They should cut it down the megapixels to HDTV res . Increase the size of the photosites spend time on trying to boost the ISO and still give a good photograph. If they can crank up the ISO and still get good quality for a multi-purpose.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2013 at 09:14 UTC as 5th comment | 1 reply

It does not looking like a photograph, it looks like a water-colour. It looks like something from Tony Hart's gallery...Disqualify

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2013 at 11:32 UTC as 5th comment | 2 replies
On article Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review (2068 comments in total)
In reply to:

Biowizard: As an E-1 user of around 10 years' standing, and having shot many thousands of images on its "mere" 5Mp sensor, I have been waiting patiently for the "right" successor. It wasn't the E-3. Nor the E-5, and I have been very happy hanging onto the E-1. Never had even one single dust speck on an image, so have never needed to clean the sensor. Only ever had one stuck pixel, and the in-camera pixel mapping sorted that out within a few seconds. I love everything about the E-1, though miss the option a higher pixel count, and newer features like wireless flash, WiFi, etc.

Sadly for me, the OM-D E-M1 is NOT the replacement I've been waiting for. I wanted full-size 4/3, with optical viewfinder. Doubtless I will motor on for a while with my beloved E-1, but sorry Olympus, my NEXT camera is going to be Nikon or Canon :-(

[Edited to correct a couple of typos]

never had an E1. OM-2n (dad's) a few compacts then E-500. Hear a lot about the E-1 ergonomics...

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2013 at 13:18 UTC
On article Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM Review (362 comments in total)
In reply to:

(unknown member): Focus issues? How about testing OEM lens in the same under less-than-ideal conditions? Are you kidding? White horse "miles" away with no contrast to focus at all at F1.4, seriously?
How about testing on Nikon instead of Canon? There are so many variables here that it is hard to believe this review.

Just use a split-prism DOH! This way you know exactly what you're focussing on. AF is over-rated.

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2013 at 11:03 UTC
On article Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review (2068 comments in total)
In reply to:

Michael Jardine: Looks great! But my entire reason for adding M43 to my stable is portability. I can't put my D800 into my jacket pocket. I can with my Pen(s), plus a lens or two. So the Pen lives with me, the D800 lives in the backpack. The EM1 would live in the backpack.

Under 1kg for getting ready to first dance is what you need. Imagine hand holding for over 12 hours...

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2013 at 22:47 UTC
On article Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review (2068 comments in total)
In reply to:

Haider: When is the E-620 successor coming out? Oly remember the E-620 body only is about £500...

I like the E-M1 grip. I'm more concerned about handling and ergonomics than a style statement. It's the right size and with lens and battery under 1kg - the right weight. IQ should be fine for 8x10 and A3...Time for the OM-D lite to make an appearance...

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2013 at 22:33 UTC
Total: 68, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »