john Clinch

Lives in United Kingdom Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
Works as a Teacher of physics
Joined on May 23, 2005

Comments

Total: 104, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Lens shootout: Sony RX10 III destroys the competition (498 comments in total)
In reply to:

abi170845: I'd rather get a new 100-400mk1 L for the same price.

Presumably you own a Canon Body already?

oh and you're not bothered by weight or size. I owned a 400m f5.6 back in the day. It's quite chunk to carry around. Hardly a consumer option for a carry around and then happen on a situation where you need the reach

I'd say you express a reasonable opinion. But one which doesn't really help in this context

Link | Posted on May 27, 2016 at 12:21 UTC
On article Lens shootout: Sony RX10 III destroys the competition (498 comments in total)

I dislike the use of the word destroy in the context

Or maybe after the shoot the Sony jumped up and through the Panasonic of a balcony

Perhaps the headline should have been. Expensive camera has slightly superior resolution to cheaper Camera.

I think the RX10 iii is a great direction for photography and I'm pleased that it works

PS can you test these cameras through less atmospher

Link | Posted on May 27, 2016 at 10:33 UTC as 80th comment
On article 2016 Roundups: Fixed Prime Lens Cameras (190 comments in total)
In reply to:

john Clinch: I don't suppose Fuji will mind too much. Surely in terms of actually sales the X100T must be the leader here. The x100 sort of defines the sector

There must a few people who are prepared to loose out on ergonomics and pay for wall size printing potential. But most people will surely not expect their carry around camera to need 42Mp or cost that much

It seems a bit like a car review magazine concluding that a Ferraro is faster than a 3 series BMW. It is, but most people will happily save cash and go for practicality

I'm not sure I was correct to say the RX1R has less good handling. I probably meant the permanently placed view finder that has the option to be direct view

I own a Sony RX100 and despite all the complaints I think the handling is good for a small camera

I agree with Malikknows they could have a couple of pics. Money no object and best value pick

Link | Posted on May 26, 2016 at 17:12 UTC
On article 2016 Roundups: Fixed Prime Lens Cameras (190 comments in total)

I don't suppose Fuji will mind too much. Surely in terms of actually sales the X100T must be the leader here. The x100 sort of defines the sector

There must a few people who are prepared to loose out on ergonomics and pay for wall size printing potential. But most people will surely not expect their carry around camera to need 42Mp or cost that much

It seems a bit like a car review magazine concluding that a Ferraro is faster than a 3 series BMW. It is, but most people will happily save cash and go for practicality

Link | Posted on May 25, 2016 at 13:44 UTC as 64th comment | 17 replies
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1122 comments in total)
In reply to:

EthanX: The 7200 has a flash - so why isn't the cell in the comparison green?

The 7200 is 24MP, the 500 is 20. Again, no green color.
The 7200 is a lot lighter. 85 grams lighter.

Plus, I believe the price row is missing... :)

So many opportunities missed to show the weaker sides of this camera compared to its cheaper older brother. Why?

...Ah, and you don't have to spend your hard earned money on features you won't really be using (200 high-end raw files in one burst? that's 20 seconds, what are we trying to capture, a passing train?).

Nevertheless, it's got some nice strengths. 4K video, tilting touchscreen (although it diesn't flip sideways), bluetooth. not bad.

I can honestly say comments on this camera are entertaining even by DPReview standards.

never has a camera been so in demand by consumers. It arrives and looks like it will deliver. Then up pop the doupters. So often with no photos online, moaning about less Mp.

Link | Posted on May 20, 2016 at 17:42 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1122 comments in total)
In reply to:

Yxa: I thought that the sensor had 20.9 mp not 20.7

Yukon Ranger

"It doesnt matter the D7200 has 24MP at less than half the price.

D500 is a scam."

this made my smile. Scam? Like you pay Nikon money and they send an empty box?

Link | Posted on May 20, 2016 at 13:53 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1122 comments in total)
In reply to:

Scottelly: Really, this is sad. Sony already has a camera capable of faster shooting and higher resolution (24 MP with no AA filter). It has a tilt screen, like this D500, and it does 4K video too, but it weighs less than this D500, and it's only half the price! How great is THAT? Nikon REALLY needs to catch up to Sony!

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1222744-REG/sony_ilce6300_b_alpha_a63000_mirrorless_digital.html

I think the ONLY thing Nikon has going for them now is that their weather seals and deep raw shooting buffer might attract a few hard-core professionals. The rest will go to Sony. Sony needs only to create a line of A9 and A9000 series cameras with weather seals, and they'll have the whole market wrapped up.

There are places where you look at mirrorless and think how do Canon and Nikon compete.

The D500 isn't one of those areas. People who are going to but a camera like this will probably want a range of lenses that Sony can't yet supply or can supply but at a higher price

Higher resolution. I think you've missed the point. This is a camera for people are beyond worrying about 10% difference in linear resolution.

An A6300 may shoot at 11fps but it doesn't have better AF. being smaller and lighter isn't actually a benefit for a camera likely to be on the end of say a 70-200 f2.8 lens

Link | Posted on May 18, 2016 at 15:29 UTC
On article Benchmark Performance: Nikon D810 review (1992 comments in total)
In reply to:

mike earussi: This review was obviously written before the K1's DR test was done, because the K1 beats the Nikon in Pixel Shift mode by several stops.

But Surely if we are prepared a faff around with 4 RAW files we can have all the dynamic range we want by bracketing....

Link | Posted on May 12, 2016 at 21:11 UTC
On article Leica Q In-depth Review (1161 comments in total)
In reply to:

Andrew Elliott: If only my Q had a CCD sensor...

Why?

Link | Posted on Mar 24, 2016 at 15:55 UTC
On article Leica Q In-depth Review (1161 comments in total)
In reply to:

mcshan: I'm sure it is a great camera and I won't lose sleep over the result. I hope the fanboys who have been pleading for a review won't cry too loudly over missing the elusive gold. Please "...handle the truth!".

We have come a long way fast. I was surprised how much better the Q performed over the original RX1r in studio tests. I have that Sony and the photos that come out of it can be amazing.

Negative (?) comments or merely friendly suggestions:
Not sure why the Ricoh ($590) was even mentioned.
In the future please don't show animals or kids in a refrigerator.

Otherwise I loved the review. Seemed fair to me. No camera is perfect. Good job DPR and thank you.

To be fair to Dpreview they wanted a shot that reflected the responsive single shot AF. A great scene in a Park or City doesn't do this

Link | Posted on Mar 24, 2016 at 15:55 UTC
On article Leica Q In-depth Review (1161 comments in total)
In reply to:

rjmccor: I don't consider myself a fanboy of Leica mainly due to price considerations. Having said that, I did buy the Q last June and never had a second thought.

The lack of button customization is an annoyance that I wish Leica would fix with a firmware update but, I've learned to live with it because the IQ of photos is superb!

Banding - what banding? I've taken a LOT of low light photos and haven't noticed the banding mentioned. Maybe my exposure settings are minimizing it.

The body is great for carrying around save a little heavy. But with the grip and a wrist strap it's not a problem.

This is a great camera for street photography (or any usage really). The images I got from a day in Philadelphia last August were excellent with a lot of character. No doubt courtesy of the great lens.

I do wish it had a built in flash.

Personally, I think the Q should have eked out a Gold rating but considering this is a more technical review I won't quibble with DPR's final score.

I can't really imagine street muggers are really differentiating products in that way.

If the neighbour hood is really that bad I wouldn't take photos on my phone or anything else as people some times don't like being photographed

Link | Posted on Mar 24, 2016 at 15:53 UTC
In reply to:

gskolenda: Personally, I think pulling shadow detail is blown way out of proportion. I think it totally depends on the image and what might be important in the shadows.

To me, I'm seeing dynamic range pushed so much that many of the new log files and L UT's are causing a milky washed out look, that I don't care for. I understand that With color grading in post, is all very subjective. it's starting to be a distinct popular style. I prefer a nice balance of contrast with more emphasis on the subject.

I would rather see better sensor performance that gives just crazy noiseless images, and video. Of course I would take dynamic range also.

Boring stuff in many ways but here is my standard lifting the shadows demo. I don't use it loads but I wouldn't be without it. If you look in the comments you can see the unedited version

https://flic.kr/p/ibxSYZ

Link | Posted on Mar 21, 2016 at 22:23 UTC
In reply to:

oliver26n: Just what the world needs, more lame super wide angle, long exposures masquerading as "art".

Thanks. The example used here is awful and I can't think why they didn't do something better

Link | Posted on Mar 7, 2016 at 15:46 UTC
In reply to:

oliver26n: Just what the world needs, more lame super wide angle, long exposures masquerading as "art".

Oliver26n In some ways you are correct. We have seen alot of long exposures. But i have really enjoyed the ones I have done and I have seen some that I really love.

Opinions are personal and not everyone likes the same things. So speak your mind

But my opinion is that if you don't have a link to your own work then you are playing the game in a way that I would regard as one sided.

So where is your work?

The link to mine is in my profile

I don't think you'll like it. But I'd rather be judged for what i have done than what I haven't

Oh and highlights (according to Flickr) hear

http://www.flickriver.com/photos/john_clinch/popular-interesting/

Link | Posted on Mar 5, 2016 at 15:16 UTC
On article Opinion: Enthusiast compacts have finally come of age (479 comments in total)
In reply to:

Vlad S: This is a moving target. First "the enthusiast compact" came of age when in response to Panasonic LX3 everyone starter making fast zoom compacts. Then it came of age when Sony released the 1" compact. Then it came of age with compact fixed FL cameras with APS-C sensors. Now we can look forward to compact APS-C 3x zooms, and possibly compact FF fixies a la Sony RX1. Then something else will come along, and none of the cameras listed in this article will be even considered seriously.

Of course its a moving target. That's progress. If your happy with what you have then fine spend your money else where. But its no disadvantage to you that the newer cameras are better if you are happy with what you have

Link | Posted on Mar 1, 2016 at 15:11 UTC
On article Opinion: Enthusiast compacts have finally come of age (479 comments in total)
In reply to:

RomanP: I replaced my aging Canon s95 with a Sony RX100 mII thinking that it could take the place of my heavy D610 for hiking in the mountains. No way.

All the image quality issues aside, the thing that bugs me the most about compacts is SPEED. When I flip the switch on my d610 I can start firing photos instantly. I don't have to wait for the lens to slide out every time. With the DSLR I can change the aperture or focus point while taking the photos...something that is really ponderous and slow on the RX100. Compacts have come a long way but they are nowhere near DSLRs.

Its is all swings and round abouts. I often walk with a DSLR without the lens cap and its just so fast to use. Its a D90 and i use the top panel to choose the focus point before the camera gets to my eye. But compact is way better one handed and if your riding a bike or climbing that is a massive difference. I'm in the process of moving from a Olympus ZX-1 to a Sony RX100. Thank you Sony for keeping on the RX 100 and letting the price fall. I'd love a TZ100 but its too much for me at the moment

Link | Posted on Mar 1, 2016 at 15:08 UTC
In reply to:

duchamp: 1. Only 300g less but twice as expensive?! How come Gitzo succeeds to make similar characteristic's tripods significantly lighter? Maybe there are different types of carbon for different price ranges?

2. What's the difference between the 804RC2 Mark ll and MHXPRO-3W heads?

I believe that people pay more for carbon because it has better damping and stiffness. So the camera moves less giving sharper picture, particularly in a strong wind

Link | Posted on Feb 8, 2016 at 15:44 UTC
On article Readers' Showcase: Stephen Cheatley (50 comments in total)

Great pictures. The UK is not an easy base for an astrophotgrapher

Link | Posted on May 24, 2015 at 15:10 UTC as 25th comment | 1 reply
On article Massive $33,500 2450mm f/8 NASA lens surfaces on eBay (235 comments in total)

Plenty of telescopes of this spec out there

Bokeh will be terrible polo mints

Link | Posted on Apr 29, 2015 at 18:08 UTC as 24th comment
On article Nikon D5500 Review (410 comments in total)
In reply to:

108: In terms of handling and ergonomy this camera is amazing . I had the chance to hold one in store, displayed next to an older D5200, and the difference is night and day. Smaller, lighter, much better grip, much better button layout . That thing isn't even bigger than my old 4/3 E620, and more pleasant to hold, and a bigger and much better sensor . Even the OVF is ok, though not as good as Pentaxs' . The cam feels better balanced than the tiny Canon 100D , and that's no small achievement . Now if only they would make the lcd screen smaller, that would make room for bigger buttons and an even more comfortable layout, I don't see the point in having big 3"2 lcd screens, 2"7 is way enough . Add an electronic gauge level in OVF that would be a very interesting camera . Ah and focus fine tune , my 620 is 6 years old and
has it .

The need for low pass filter is reduced by the higher resolution sensor. To an extent the lens takes over the role

Link | Posted on Apr 4, 2015 at 20:44 UTC
Total: 104, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »