z2122

I have done some cobtrolled tests and the 14-30 is now on the same level as the 24-70f4  ( I got my 14-30 1week ago)

very good composition and a good example how to use UWA lenses.  Looks like Italy ot Spain ...

good point . I will do mainly landscape and interior or architecture and for that the f4 and IBIS is perfect. I can go up to 1/20 handheld and still have high amount of good sharpness

very beautiful .... for me f4 is fine - together with IBIS this is a powerful package and due to the low weight of the f4 I will take it more often with me .

yes, ... I changed my mind during last weekend - I keep it. f2.8 is good to have - the 24-70 2.8 S is a very good lens and I like it.....

Got today the 14-30 f4 and I am really impressed - semms to have good IQ. In the past I had the Samyang 14 and the nikon 17-35 , also the 18-35G . But the 14-30 is in a different league. Impressive ...

a lot of different goods are delayed ....  supply chains are not working fully

sometime ago I have done a detailed comparision between 24-70 f4 and the f2.8G .... https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/62018227 the f2.8 S is sharper than the f4 , but only in the corners and ...

I forgot the second important advantage of the f2.8 S lens  .... it has one addional customizable button ;-)

I used for many years a 24-70 f2.8 G lens and liked the possibility of f2.8 when traveling for dusk/dawn or night pictures and for portraits. The weight and size was never a problem for me. When I ...

yes - fully agree ... and I would be happy to have now all the tv and video content in 4K - sometimes it is not even FHD, but still 720p. When I stream 4K content my Internetaccess is maybe already ...

a very good solution - constant f1.8 from 35 to 85mm and top IQ from f1.8 on. I had in the past 28, 50 and 85 f1.8 G lenses, but seldom used them. For me a zoom is better, although I am very ...

thank you all for your information ... it makes for me no sense to keep the 2.8, BUT it is so beautiful build - a real masterpiece of design and production capabilities and it gives the Z6 a very ...

I bought a 24-70 f2.8 Z and it is a beautiful , well made lens - sharp from f2.8 on. Sharper in the corners than the f4 version, but only noticeable when I zoom in by 200%. With 100 % the ...

I tried Luminar 3 and I was really disappointed.  Based on your experience I will not try Luminar 4 and stay with LR 6.14  .   The okd LR 6 is much better than Luminar -  User Interface , speed , ...

thank you for the overview .... it helped to get a good picture I am an enthusiast and use LR maybe once or twice a month.  My only camera is a Z6 and 80% of the pictures are from the 24-70 f4. ...

yes , Affinity Photo is good - I have it since one year -  I evaluated LR alternatives, but staied with LR. It is too convenient for me. Affinity Photo is for me a Photoshop alternative . Does AP ...

I am an enthusiast and have a Z6 with the 24-70 f4 and really like it. To convert the raw files I use the Adobe raw-dng converter and then import the raw files to LR 6.14. What do I loose with ...

I am an enthusiast and have a Z6 with the 24-70 f4 and really like it. To convert the raw files I use the Adobe raw-dng converter and then import the raw files to LR 6.14. What do I loose with ...

Sigma CEO said, that they will release smaller f2.8 primes for mirrorless. Currently only for Sony and L-mount