z2122

that's a good conclusion ... and also similar to my results

???

this is NOT true according to nikon website: z6: 585g   without      ------  675g with battery and card d750:  750g    without  -------  840 g with   battery and card the difference is only 165g ... ...

thank you for your open statement.  but at least you save weight and have ibis and other advantages. ibis is also for me very attractive... will improve my 28f1.8 and 85f1.8 lenses.  yes maybe i ...

interesting view .... yes let's wait. maybe the difference is also not so significant here. i already compared 24-70 f2.8 MILC lenses ( weight of sony 24-70f2.8)  with non-MILC lenses like Nikon ...

yes - thats true.... so here again ISO 12800 with bulb lights and the face of the lady is from the dark left part of the test picture: z6 jpg is better- a7III jpg the same as D750... EOS R is not ...

ok .... the point is, that i have a d750 with good and fast glass. the z6 may be a little bit better with iso 12800 jpgs but in my shooting there are only a few pictures where i need that - ...

i fully agree, that if i have nothing and want to buy a new camera, the z-mount is theway to go. but i have a d750 with 24-70 f2.8 ( alse some primes like 300 pf f4 ) and i do need to invest some ...

z6 IQ comparision https://m.dpreview.com/articles/6705906050/nikon-z6-image-quality-and-dynamic-range-impress-but-not-without-caveats or https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen ...

i compared f2.8 with f2.8 and f4 with f4. ( all 24-70) it's clear that a f4 is lighter than a f2.8 . but if i want 2.8 than there will be not much weight saving going mirrorless .

Currently I am considering a change from D750 24-70 f2.8 G to Nikon Z6 or Z7. D750 has only 160 gramms more than the bare z6. (but I will have the FTZ in my backback .. so more or less not much ...

this is an assumption but I do not see how you come to that conclusion... Nikon lenses are very good and the difference to Canon lenses is not noticeable. A 300f2.8VRII is class leading - the 300pf ...

yes more than 3 kg is too heavy / weight is an issue, but for me also cost. A 400mm FL is too expensive for me - even if I would get 20% discount ( in Austria the price is 12.000 euro)

First of all a BIG THANK YOU for giving me within a day such an good insight to the pros and cons of Nikons super-tele-glass. It is impressive for me to see how much money Nikonians spend on very ...

I am an enthusiast and have a D750. 2 years ago I had a Tamron 150-600 .. but was not so happy with the IQ and max. aperture . Now I see that some "older " supertelephoto lenses come down to an ...

the body of the z6 is only 70 gramm lighter tha the D750 body.  so a weight advantage is only there if you use s-lenses

the z6 is smaller than a D750 ( not that much),  but the weight is nearly the same (z6 is 70 gramms lighter than a D750) .  so overall this is in the same league.

yes ... often people buy that what they want and not what they need ....

oooh yes ... IBIS , GAS and maybe some event like Christmas or birthday  could be the ideal mix to switch off my brain and simply buy the Z6

I tried a 36Mpix D800 , but sold it after a few weeks and kept the D750 I didn'the needed the 36Mpix and in real life  it was not that big difference compared  to the 24mpix. maybe 47mpix is ...