Mike CH

Lives in Switzerland Zürich, Switzerland
Joined on Mar 2, 2008

Comments

Total: 356, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

It’s not April 1, right?

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2018 at 20:43 UTC as 51st comment
In reply to:

Mike CH: It appears to be very painful to actually have to go to the page where the image is originally published. The page where you e.g. normally also get more information about the artist.

I would have thought that photographers would actually appreciate that thought.

So you’re saying that all those moaners here are less capable than 4-5 years old kids?

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2018 at 07:30 UTC
In reply to:

Mike CH: It appears to be very painful to actually have to go to the page where the image is originally published. The page where you e.g. normally also get more information about the artist.

I would have thought that photographers would actually appreciate that thought.

So what is the moaning about?

Some kind of instant gratification must have disappeared, otherwise the moaning wouldn't be that loud...

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2018 at 18:55 UTC

It appears to be very painful to actually have to go to the page where the image is originally published. The page where you e.g. normally also get more information about the artist.

I would have thought that photographers would actually appreciate that thought.

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2018 at 17:52 UTC as 14th comment | 7 replies
In reply to:

Mike CH: Cue lots of moaning about how it now becomes much more difficult to get at high-res images...

... all the while ignoring that there actually is such a thing called copyright.

@Tungsten - did I say that looking at them infringes copyright? No, I didn't.

So why do you imply that I did?

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2018 at 18:44 UTC

Cue lots of moaning about how it now becomes much more difficult to get at high-res images...

... all the while ignoring that there actually is such a thing called copyright.

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2018 at 17:04 UTC as 49th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Mike CH: Some commentaries simply crack me up.

ML is all about compact size, being smaller and lighter and so. Until it suddenly isn’t.😂

I think you guys should go look for a sense humor - you‘ve obviously lost yours 😫😫😫

Link | Posted on Feb 14, 2018 at 17:23 UTC
In reply to:

Mike CH: Some commentaries simply crack me up.

ML is all about compact size, being smaller and lighter and so. Until it suddenly isn’t.😂

Yeah, yeah - whatever 🤪

I simply don’t get the insecurity you guys have with regards to your choice of gear. You can’t even let out a chance to harp on about how ML is driving everything else out...

Link | Posted on Feb 14, 2018 at 13:54 UTC
In reply to:

Mike CH: Some commentaries simply crack me up.

ML is all about compact size, being smaller and lighter and so. Until it suddenly isn’t.😂

... and it is totally irrelevant which camera you use when there is a 400mm f/2.8 mounted to it - it won’t fit in any jacket pocket 😂

But thank you for bringing up the size comparison, substantiating my point about ML being about the size - until it isn’t 😜

Link | Posted on Feb 14, 2018 at 11:51 UTC
In reply to:

Mike CH: Some commentaries simply crack me up.

ML is all about compact size, being smaller and lighter and so. Until it suddenly isn’t.😂

You mean as opposed to the total lack of humor that the rest displays? Certainly.

Link | Posted on Feb 14, 2018 at 09:57 UTC
In reply to:

Mike CH: Some commentaries simply crack me up.

ML is all about compact size, being smaller and lighter and so. Until it suddenly isn’t.😂

Nah, I leave the hole digging to the humorless fanbois - they are simply too good 😇

Link | Posted on Feb 14, 2018 at 08:08 UTC
In reply to:

Mike CH: Some commentaries simply crack me up.

ML is all about compact size, being smaller and lighter and so. Until it suddenly isn’t.😂

Those comments are *exactly* those that I mean.

ML is all about being small and light - until the realisation breaks through that that thing called physics actually can’t be fooled with - and that 400mm f/2.8 lenses have the sizes that they have. And the size of the camera is actually rather irrelevant.

Hypocrites, the lot 😂

Link | Posted on Feb 14, 2018 at 06:13 UTC

Some commentaries simply crack me up.

ML is all about compact size, being smaller and lighter and so. Until it suddenly isn’t.😂

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2018 at 18:00 UTC as 14th comment | 18 replies
In reply to:

Mr Bolton: Ahh.. but can I plug it right into my Video Toaster Flyer?

... also helps in pinpointing deficiencies in the humor department, apparently?

Link | Posted on Feb 10, 2018 at 15:23 UTC

So this is supposed to be a bear of a camera?

A female bear, perhaps?

Link | Posted on Feb 10, 2018 at 15:21 UTC as 16th comment
On article Sigma announces full-frame 14-24mm F2.8 DG HSM Art lens (232 comments in total)
In reply to:

uzman1243: 1.2kg? Jesus my tripod is lighter

Then you should probably consider a new tripod before getting this lens?

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2018 at 12:39 UTC
In reply to:

AshMills: You seriously think I would wait 8 hours to drink it?

DPR posters looking beautiful?

I’d have assumed that needed something stronger than just 8 hours of beer 😱

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2018 at 08:58 UTC
In reply to:

RedWattlebird: Posting the footage on this website is just as wrong. But hey, you get the clicks so who cares if it is wrong?

Not posting this would just have more people screaming “Fake”, “Didn’t happen”, “Where is the proof of this fake news?”
Neither posting nor not posting is ideal here.

Link | Posted on Feb 8, 2018 at 07:22 UTC
In reply to:

Internet Enzyme: With a shutter speed of 142 nano seconds, I wonder how much light you would need to use the lowest ISO.

I think the technical term is “lots and lots of light” 😉

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2018 at 06:42 UTC
In reply to:

Mike CH: Before that whole rent vs. ownership discussion starts again:

You have never, even in the past, as a consumer *owned* software. You have, at the most, owned a *license* for perpetual use. And the media on which it came.

"the keyword is perpetual" - Yes, I know that. That's the reason why I used it a couple of times.

Do you know the difference in rights between something that you own (which people falsely claim they do with software) and having a perpetual license to use (which people actually can have with software)?

Link | Posted on Feb 1, 2018 at 12:51 UTC
Total: 356, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »