xyxyxyxyxy

@thecyclon "Manual lenses don't count."

I think, in your case reality doesn't count.

@rawdinal: ...except for the price ;-)

@Panafuji:"The only thing it shares with the old model is the focal length."

No, it also is a very mediocre lens - a shame for Sigma, but it is cheap, made for the normal cheapo.

Unfortunately, none of you got it: if Sigma doesn't offer Z lenses, I can't buy one for my Nikon Z. Got it now?
And, thecylon et al.: there are third-party lenses for the Nikon Z. The Z-system is -...

As always, Sigma: No z = No deal.

There is no such thing as 'perfect'.
But the Z 100-400 comes rather near...

DxO not only corrects lens errors but creates correction modules for the specific combinations of sensor and optics. If you prefer more primitive types of correction, you can still improve various...

why don't you buy some other software instead of crying our heads off here?

It is also possible to preload desired modules, you don't have to wait for the first picture with the lens. It would be very nice if people, before expressing criticism, first seriously deal with...

Up until now, unfortunately, DxO is still unable to support an absolute Nikon Z standard lens: the Nikkor Z 100-400. Absolutely unprofessional.

Cheapo, Marx.

Yes - it was obvious.

Thank you - same to you.

@snapa you wrote: "standing on the moon would not be my first thing in life I would want to do"

Well - who told _you_ to stand on the moon? There is nothing to be seen there for you - just go...

You guys are really funny when you're not talking about photography.

Well - it's a Sony ;-)

"Third option is to change/modify laws and penalties, but this won't happen with Dems."

How would you like it, old elephant - head off?

@snegron22 "no problem knocking on the door."

Uh - no. Not while you knock.

If they find Leicas, they possibly still work ;-)

...dropped?