Landscapephoto99

Good, best wishes on the search.

I know this isn't about say high speed sports photography at night, but it might provide some insights on switching from FF to micro 43s. http://aurelm.com/2017/07/10/olympus-e-m1-mark-2-english-re ...

Thank you, that is helpful.  Is there any f2.8 zoom lens that would work for video and fast moving subjects?

How well does the Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 DT SSM SAL1650 with an adapter work on the A6500?  Anybody have experience with this?

Nice job for hand held MF!

A question for skeptics, is all this high end glass they are introducing (4 pro lenses?), just for the E-M1 Mark II?  Just saying and trolling a bit I admit :-) I personally like the idea someone ...

This prediction is worth what you pay for it :-), but I think that we may see a new high end OMD, maybe E-M5 iii? or maybe the E-M10iii is not what it seems?, coming soon. There are so many high ...

Great photos, thank you.

Do FE lenses need an adapter on the Sony a6500?

I don't see why it should be a problem to use say the EM1II with the PanaLeica 100-400mm lens (600mm equiivalent) or the Olympus 300mm f4 for reach.    Do a search of the forum here for people who ...

You won't get any complaints from me about including OSPDAF,

Given the 4K video it can't be exactly the same sensor as the PEN-F.  I'm thinking more of the E-M5 series which does not seem to have an upgrade on the horizon. In the E-M5 series, Olympus has in ...

If the small EM10 III has the same sensor IQ as the EM1 II and image stabilization and water proofing it would be perfect, at least for my needs.  No need for the EM5 series, though I like my EM5 ...

Get a KP.  It is small and has the best IQ of Pentax Cameras which is to say very good.

lol You're trolling so what do you expect?

I could do this with the E-1 II at ISO 1600.  Tests consistently show no more than a one stop advantage of Fuji over m43.  No matter how much someone pooh poohs m43,  claiming nothing over ISO 200 ...

Yes, this was my thought.  Why not just post-process B&W?  I guess it is nice to have it done in camera, but not essential.

Ok, 16-50mm f2.8 then. Every other mount has one, I think. A native e mount lens would be smaller and work better than one with an adapter.

It seems that is what is really holding the emount back is a good basic zoom lens.  Even if Sony doesn't want to put a lot of investment into the APS-C e mount a good basic zoom seems like the ...

Agreed. Before full RAW support came out, everyone was talking about how the Em1.2 was exactly the same as the PEN F, and maybe a bit worse. Then with RAW support we all saw how well the new ...