Landscapephoto99

You won't get any complaints from me about including OSPDAF,

Given the 4K video it can't be exactly the same sensor as the PEN-F.  I'm thinking more of the E-M5 series which does not seem to have an upgrade on the horizon. In the E-M5 series, Olympus has in ...

If the small EM10 III has the same sensor IQ as the EM1 II and image stabilization and water proofing it would be perfect, at least for my needs.  No need for the EM5 series, though I like my EM5 ...

Get a KP.  It is small and has the best IQ of Pentax Cameras which is to say very good.

lol You're trolling so what do you expect?

I could do this with the E-1 II at ISO 1600.  Tests consistently show no more than a one stop advantage of Fuji over m43.  No matter how much someone pooh poohs m43,  claiming nothing over ISO 200 ...

Yes, this was my thought.  Why not just post-process B&W?  I guess it is nice to have it done in camera, but not essential.

Ok, 16-50mm f2.8 then. Every other mount has one, I think. A native e mount lens would be smaller and work better than one with an adapter.

It seems that is what is really holding the emount back is a good basic zoom lens.  Even if Sony doesn't want to put a lot of investment into the APS-C e mount a good basic zoom seems like the ...

Agreed. Before full RAW support came out, everyone was talking about how the Em1.2 was exactly the same as the PEN F, and maybe a bit worse. Then with RAW support we all saw how well the new ...

With the E-M1ii and the PEN-F there is a real difference. ISO 100 has greater resolution and lower noise than ISO 200.  Check out Imaging Resource's reviews of these two cameras to see the ...

I can't access the link, but I understand.  I've done some tests myself and the difference is between 1/2 and 1 stop at the max.  Considering I can shoot at lower ISOs, my IQ is going to be better ...

I've lost many a brand loyal friend suggesting this, but such companies as Corel and Affinity make fine Photoshop substitutes at a fraction of the cost and you can actually own them.

Yes, we know that the very best APS-C is a little better than the best m43.  What's the point?  Why not include the Nikon D500 in there?  It might even best the Fuji and there are so many lenses. T ...

Likely this ordering for stills: EM1 II GH5 PEN-F GX8 EM5 II  or EM1 I And this for video: GH5 E-M1 ii GH4 GX85 GX*

Yes, that does look like a really nice camera.  Wish Olympus would update their enthusiast model, the E-M5 series, too.

Interesting, thank you.  The only problem is that it just assumes that there is one 20MP sensor that is being modified for all of the new cameras.  As we have seen, that is clearly not true.

There has been quite a bit of improvement: https://robinwong.blogspot.com/2016/11/olympus-om-d-e-m1-mark-ii-review_8.html

I considered buying the A6500 and you aren't gaining much of anything.  Maybe a stop better of noise?  But given that you will be shooting at higher ISOs, IQ may even be worse.    Greater ...

This is just not true.  You are comparing the latest Fuji to the GM, which is hardly the best or newest sensor. I know there is a lot of fanboyism out there, but the Fuji sensor is at best a ...