JensR

I stand corrected, that's good to know! Incidentally I yesterday saw a women carrying a baby in a sling hugging her shoulder corner like that and the sling stayed in place despite her moving her...

It's interesting how these weak liberal snowflakes are able to censor the strong conservative alphas. Oh wait. That doesn't really happen (at least not more than the other way around), and your...

Then I am sure you will defend those people's right to freedomly express their dislike for transgressing rules of civility.

Phil, the amount you complain in these comments about people preferring civility (or as you smear it, "political correctness"), one might think you are offended by their honest opinions about how...

not sure, I find it rather twerkalicious!

Is the photo-critiquing site photosig still around? I remember they had an algorithm 10 years ago that was fairly good in ignoring unhelpful critique. I would think that something like that but...

That sounds good! It is interesting that you had the feeling of slipping I envisioned, but it didn't actually happen, which is of course good. Definitely something I would want to test before...

The pad actually looks too wide on the model, it moves the centre line further out, which looks as if it increases risk of slipping, but certainly moves the weight further out, which is not good...

spec sheet says optical

Clear difference in noise between my samples? Not really. The averaged photo looks basically identical to the one-shot one until superhigh ISOs. Yes, because at superhigh ISOs, ISOinvariance breaks ...

Well, then repeat the test with higher ISO if you cannot tell the difference or push the RAW further. And if you think this should be equivalent to an ISO 500 exposure, then show us one to compare! ...

Jesse_Just_Him Imprecise phrasing on your part. Aperture refers to the opening diameter or area, therefore large aperture lenses are large. Lenses with a small f-number can be tiny though if your...

No, f2 lenses can be tiny, see your smartphone. However, a lens with a 100mm aperture diameter will always be large...

Come on Mike, that is just not right, I have shown you ISO 6400 vs ISO 51200 and instead of admitting that something went catastrophically wrong with your example, you claim I used low ISO and ...

I thinbk you know what I think ;) It does, I posted the proof (others have before me, of course). I use this equivalence when doing very long exposures and calculate effective ISO for my stacked ...

That's not an answer to my question which method you used. I can see you didn't try additive. Does that mean you used "bright" in your example? Or "average" Edit: I can see in your other post you ...

Oooooohhhhh. Well, in that case, let me modify my previous question: Which method of combining did you select in the menu? It depends on the number of photons captured. If you define "underexposed" ...

I posted that regarding your comment on noise power: "demonstrating that averaging n realizations of the same, uncorrelated noise reduces noise power by a factor of n" Now, the thing you need to ...

I agree that your sample shows a noteworthy difference. However, the K1 is not really isoinvariant at that level anymore. Not sure how you averaged, I assume a photoshop function? Did you choose ...

We had this discussion before, Mike ;) > the truth of the matter is the reduction in random noise from stacking is equal to the square root of the number of the number of photos being stacked I ...