biza43

Sounds like a good and sensible plan:) I have my doubts that the 24 1.4 will perform well for astro in terms of typical corner aberrations, but wish you luck. This is based from looking at similar ...

The 24-70 f4 zoom is actually quite good.

They are both excellent lenses. If you plan to stay at 35mm for most of your work, get the prime.

Any of the cameras will do. Think about lenses.

I am sure they will be top quality lenses, and make sense to expand the respective line ups. But to me, they will too big and heavy, and I left behind my days of using big and heavy lenses. As for ...

Normally, common sense dictates: 1. Get a fast prime in the middle of the zoom range if you need to shoot in light where f2.8 is not fast enough. 2. Get a wider and/or tele zoom.

Yes.

Much less noise in long exposure work.

Easy, if you like 50mm, concentrate on that one. Choose according to your budget and weight tolerance.

Any filter? Does it happen at other apertures?

If you are talking about me, bear in mind that I am not a troll, so stop your insults right there. The forum rules very clearly state that folks should search before posting. As you can clearly ...

I can highly recommend Jeff Schewe's "The Digital Negative" book. He used to work for Adobe, I think.

You need to search better. Below is just one example of a recent thread on the subject, from last week: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4318310 I was trying to help and point out that this ...

Yes, the answer is the many threads about this subject. After you do a search and the threads show up, you actually need to go into them, where people talk about the alternatives.

What creative projects do you have in mind?

The one I need to shoot what I want to shoot.

So, what sort of new answers are you expecting?

Excellent shots.

I am from Lisbon, I recommend 35mm.

Nice work.