garyknrd

Lives in Thailand
Works as a Retired
Has a website at www.birdsthatfart.com
Joined on Jan 2, 2011
About me:

Retired. Hobby, bird photography

Comments

Total: 313, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

phoenix15: Looking to those comparisons, making D500 is more tempting. And by the way is there any news regarding Nikon Df-2 using sensor in D5 ?

phoenix15, my thoughts on the D500 also!

Link | Posted on Jul 31, 2016 at 22:53 UTC

Wow, nice review. And very interesting to say the least. I was just asking a question about AF! With only a few years left in me for action photography it would be nice to try the new Nikon system. Very tempting.

Link | Posted on Jul 31, 2016 at 11:45 UTC as 92nd comment
On article 8 creative tips for shooting waterfalls (160 comments in total)

Thanks, I live in a land with endless waterfalls, and I do not have a clue how to photograph them. I will try some of these tips.

Link | Posted on Jul 30, 2016 at 12:03 UTC as 62nd comment | 1 reply
On article Rock Solid: Canon 1D X Mark II Review (438 comments in total)
In reply to:

Graham: Great review, but I am puzzled that RAW performance is tested using ACR, not DPP. The package consists of the camera body, a battery, RAW conversion software and accessories. The camera is tested with the supplied battery, not a third party substitute, so why are RAW files evaluated using third party RAW converters?

I attended a presentation of the new camera by Andy Rouse, who explained that his lovely high ISO images of kingfishers had been processed in DPP, that he could not achieve similar results with ACR or Lightroom, and that DPP seemed to be performing some kind of magic not available to Adobe.

Maybe that has changed since the beta version of the camera and ACR has caught up, but would it not be a more valid comparison to test ISO performance with the software supplied by the camera manufacturers instead of, or as well as, a RAW converter made by a third party? After all, everyone buying the camera will have the maker's software, but not everyone will have ACR.

I've tried DPP (latest version) with my Mark IV . I have tried everything I know to try, and cannot get the results I get from ACR on high ISO shots. I quit using it because I always can extract more detail out of the ACR developed shots then over to Photoshop?
On low ISO shots and with BIF shots I use it sometimes! I personally do not believe the hype anymore. My opinion anyway.

Link | Posted on Jul 28, 2016 at 08:20 UTC
On article All about control: Huawei P9 camera review (93 comments in total)
In reply to:

garyknrd: These Cheap China phone's are great. I just picked up xiaomi mi 5. Could not be happier.

I'll check it out, thanks for the tip.

Link | Posted on Jul 23, 2016 at 07:54 UTC
On article All about control: Huawei P9 camera review (93 comments in total)
In reply to:

Dpreviewmember: NOKIA 950 seems to have better IQ.
NOKIA1020 and the ancient 808 far better IQ, all with full manual controls, RAW+JPEG, IOS for 950/1020, real flash for 1020/808.
So what is the novelty about this Huawei again ? ;-)

You know Nokia is due to enter the smart phone business again in late 2016 or early 2017. They have partnered up with another company that bought out Microsoft's concern. I bought a few hundred shares of there stock a few months ago. Hoping there new phones will be a success? Fingers crossed.

Link | Posted on Jul 23, 2016 at 06:21 UTC
On article All about control: Huawei P9 camera review (93 comments in total)
In reply to:

garyknrd: These Cheap China phone's are great. I just picked up xiaomi mi 5. Could not be happier.

Yep, Qualcomm's last chip had some heat issue's. And the stock suffered. The new Snapdragon 820 has put them back in the hunt... :)
I'm kicking myself for not buying more of their stock a few months ago... arrrrrr.

Link | Posted on Jul 23, 2016 at 06:09 UTC
On article All about control: Huawei P9 camera review (93 comments in total)

These Cheap China phone's are great. I just picked up xiaomi mi 5. Could not be happier.

Link | Posted on Jul 22, 2016 at 23:39 UTC as 31st comment | 6 replies
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 Review (2175 comments in total)

I would be careful with the AF claiming to be much better. I used the new pro2 a few weeks ago with the 100-400 and it was a dog to put it mildly. Compared to a DSLR.
I am desperately wanting to go mirror less but the AF has to be up to snuff. I am hoping DPR will put out a detailed AF review.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 22:34 UTC as 278th comment | 7 replies

At least they acknowledged it. Good to know.

Link | Posted on Jun 29, 2016 at 04:11 UTC as 16th comment

Watching this made me go pull out some old prints I made years ago. I used to get rolls of Tec pan 2415 and Konica 1600. Pull them off the roll in a changing bag and onto a large spool and Hyper the film. Pulling a vacuum on the container then cooking it. Then back onto the roll and into the camera for a nights shooting. LOL. Then back home to the bathroom for processing. I still have an old Besler 23 C around somewhere. What a mess.
Makes you appreciate Digital.. But a lot of fun back then.
Did any of you old timers do any of this kind of processing?

Link | Posted on Jun 25, 2016 at 14:53 UTC as 51st comment | 6 replies
On article The Canon that can: Canon EOS 80D Review (714 comments in total)
In reply to:

Glenn Barber: Have the 70D and 7DII. Really looking forward to what the next generation of sensor can do on a 7DIII. My only complaint with the 7D2 is lifting noise on shadows and darker bird plumage. Looks like we are finally addressing that. 4K would be nice - and yes - I want to be able to turn on touch screen on the 7DIII.

I don't have either camera but, what you said about the 7d III will persuade me to buy in a heart beat.

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2016 at 02:43 UTC
In reply to:

Mikael Risedal: Nikon has done a reverse Canon, take a look here

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/57506229

Why Nikon have chosen to use this type of sensor in D5 with high read out noise at base ISO they only know.
time will tell.

Sony starting to squeeze there third party buyer's?
Interesting to see what unfolds.

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2016 at 23:30 UTC
On article Field Test: The Sony Cyber-shot RX100 IV in Mexico (135 comments in total)

Looks like you guys had a lot of fun. A great place. I love it down there.
Nice video.

Link | Posted on Mar 1, 2016 at 07:53 UTC as 31st comment
On article CP+ 2016: Pentax K-1 past and present (152 comments in total)
In reply to:

Aroart: Looking forward to the K-9 and taking it for a walk....

Dr. Who. Great show by the way.

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2016 at 20:58 UTC
In reply to:

garyknrd: What a bunch of nonsense.

Worked in fab plants and very tight tolerance parts plants. Aviation parts, chip manufacturing and assembly.
The big change that I saw was analog to digital control. And the advances in tolerances they could bring.
Been in electronic think tanks as an ignorant observer.
Digital control, the algorithms developed and devices that the controllers controlled got so good the quality control improved dramatically!
Just observing the lens market in the last few years is amazing. The quality is at an all time high. Just a few years ago you could not buy consumer grade optics at this level. The quality is way up.
And as an amateur astronomer. Which has nothing to do with manufacturing, I ground my own flat, and designed and built my own Schmidt camera. Interesting part of that design and build was the corrector plate. I used the vacuum method used by Schmidt himself. Google it if interested.

I like some of the tear down articles this guy has. But, this article smells IMO.

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2016 at 02:27 UTC

What a bunch of nonsense.

Link | Posted on Feb 11, 2016 at 19:47 UTC as 22nd comment | 18 replies
On article Video: A quick look at the Sony a6300 (217 comments in total)
In reply to:

garyknrd: For a industry that is dying. This has got to be the best time in history to be an amateur photographer.

Guess I should of said suposidly dying!
I'm quite frankly amazed at the current offerings.
Couldn't have asked for a better time to retire as an amateur photographer! It will just get better IMO.

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2016 at 09:34 UTC
On article Video: A quick look at the Sony a6300 (217 comments in total)

For a industry that is dying. This has got to be the best time in history to be an amateur photographer.

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2016 at 01:25 UTC as 46th comment | 8 replies
On article X-Factor: Canon's EOS-1D X Mark II examined in-depth (618 comments in total)
In reply to:

spiderhunter: It would be good if advancement in technology meant smaller camera sizes.

"Try playing with a 300 f/2.8 or 500 f/4 lens and you will not want to use smaller bodies."
I disagree with that comment, but everyone is different.
But, I am really looking forward to my first FF camera body after several years of shooting crop. The new 1dx II looks to be exactly what I have been waiting for. Thanks Canon!

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 00:57 UTC
Total: 313, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »