Collett

Collett

Lives in United States CA, United States
Joined on Mar 25, 2010

Comments

Total: 41, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
On photo Pride of the Pond in the The Lotus Pond challenge (7 comments in total)

Love it!

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2015 at 18:24 UTC as 5th comment
On photo Sea Stack Streaks in the My Best Photo of the Week challenge (4 comments in total)

Lovely!

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2015 at 18:20 UTC as 1st comment
On photo Cinderella in the Fairy tale challenge (18 comments in total)

Very nice!

Link | Posted on Dec 14, 2014 at 14:56 UTC as 12th comment
On Challenge:9777 (2 comments in total)

Lots of very high quality images in this challenge!

Posted on Aug 19, 2014 at 01:00 UTC as 1st comment
On photo sundown all around in the Harmony of Colours in Nature challenge (10 comments in total)

Fantastic!

Link | Posted on Aug 19, 2014 at 00:57 UTC as 1st comment
On photo . in the water fight challenge (6 comments in total)

Very nice! I see you used the 135L, my favorite lens :-).

Link | Posted on Aug 10, 2014 at 14:05 UTC as 2nd comment | 1 reply
On photo Fern Spring Leaf in the One Yellow Leaf challenge (7 comments in total)

Fantastic image!

Link | Posted on Jul 5, 2014 at 16:05 UTC as 2nd comment
On photo Monterey 17 mile drive in the My Best Photo of the Week challenge (1 comment in total)

Also used a Lee Big stopper for the long exposure

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2014 at 17:43 UTC as 1st comment
In reply to:

Collett: Looks like a sweet walk around combo. Significantly lighter than my 5dIII plus 50L.

Because the Zeiss will likely be as good (and perhaps better) as the 50L at F1.8, while the Canon 50F1.8 is not and is not even close. I am thinking any new Canon 50F1.8 is going to weigh significantly more than the nifty fifty, have better IQ but doubtful it will be as good as this Zeiss, and have a price tag closer to the Zeiss. Also, Canon does not have a FF body that comes close to the weight of the Sony - nor one that is 36mp. Add the saving in weight of the body AND the lens - and it is significant.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2014 at 20:34 UTC

Looks like a sweet walk around combo. Significantly lighter than my 5dIII plus 50L.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2014 at 18:36 UTC as 23rd comment | 5 replies
On photo 20140105_1085 in Collett's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Hyw 1 Big Sur

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 06:16 UTC as 1st comment
On photo 20140105_1052 200dpi in Collett's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Hyw 1 Big Sur

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 06:16 UTC as 1st comment
On photo 20140105_1147 in Collett's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Hyw 1 Big Sur

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 06:16 UTC as 1st comment
On photo 20140105_1138 in Collett's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Hyw 1 Big Sur

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 06:15 UTC as 1st comment
On photo Timeless Splendor in the City of Rome – Italy II challenge (4 comments in total)

Very nice!

Link | Posted on Dec 11, 2013 at 18:20 UTC as 1st comment
On photo Golden Harvest in the Prairie Harvest challenge (8 comments in total)

Very nice capture!

Link | Posted on Oct 21, 2013 at 18:08 UTC as 6th comment
On Challenge:8285 (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

HGFGKM: Are photos from aquaria allowed in this challenge?

Wondering the same thing.

Posted on May 9, 2013 at 20:36 UTC
On photo The hand of the climber in the F1.4 challenge (1 comment in total)

Very nice!

Link | Posted on May 1, 2013 at 01:16 UTC as 1st comment
On Challenge:7975 (18 comments in total)
In reply to:

Collett: THIS CHALLENGE SHOULD BE THROWN OUT. INCONSISTENT AND ABRITRARY RULES HAVE BEEN APPLIED.

No - you made the comment that they would be allowed and left many entries alone that were clearly not the photographers POV - and relying upon that I entered the challenge (only one entry). Then my entry got disqualified andthe others were still in at that point. It appears you dumped the others in an attempt to be consistent. Look - the problem is you changing the rules as you go alongbecause you were not so clear initially. If you change your rules - you should err on the side of being overly inclusive and letting the voters decide as was you INITIAL decision. However, these discussions would have likely been spoilers for entrys such as mine with the poll vaulters feet anyways regardless of what the initial rules said.

Posted on Mar 18, 2013 at 20:24 UTC
On Challenge:7975 (18 comments in total)
In reply to:

Collett: THIS CHALLENGE SHOULD BE THROWN OUT. INCONSISTENT AND ABRITRARY RULES HAVE BEEN APPLIED.

See your statement below "I just cancelled the disquallification on this photo and a couple others. On reassessment I decided that technically it meets the criteria of it being your feet with a background and I will leave it up to the voters to decide how fantastic it is." You did not cancel the others when I made the statement and instead you changed your mind again in stating that you disqualified all of these - hence the term abritrary at the time I made the post.

Posted on Mar 18, 2013 at 17:32 UTC
Total: 41, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »