crsantin

Lives in Canada Canada
Works as a Teacher
Joined on Nov 1, 2006

Comments

Total: 49, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
On article Nikon D5600 sample gallery (164 comments in total)

Very nice image quality and colours. High ISO seems fine. My only problem with these Nikons are the poor viewfinders, lack of focus motor, and lack of flash commander. I have to step up to the 7000 series to get these features so that's what I've done, but I do like the size and performance of the 5000 series cameras.

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2017 at 14:48 UTC as 21st comment
On article CES 2017: Hands-on with the Kodak Super 8 (426 comments in total)

Been looking at some super 8 films over on Youtube...no thanks LOL. This isn't something that should be making a comeback. What's next, 8 track players for our cars? Film is awesome and I still shoot it along with digital. Glad that 35mm Ektachrome is back, I'll be buying some. Super 8? Not so much.

Link | Posted on Jan 8, 2017 at 19:52 UTC as 57th comment
On article 2016 DPReview Readers' Best Shots: People (93 comments in total)

#5 is quite nice. Most of these are good or very good but I still see people are quite fond of the clarity slider in PS. I hope 2017 brings an end to that trend.

Link | Posted on Dec 31, 2016 at 15:42 UTC as 39th comment | 1 reply

This would have been a great April fools post.

Link | Posted on Dec 14, 2016 at 13:04 UTC as 86th comment
On article Woof! Sony a6500 sample images are here (364 comments in total)
In reply to:

Robemo: Oops. I was being optimistic in my last post. Price for a body is even € 1699 here in Europe (= $ 1890). I guess I have to keep my old gear ....

Yes Canadian camera prices are sickening. Even on the used market. I don't understand how Canadian retailers like Henrys are still in business. Pricing is outrageous.

Link | Posted on Nov 19, 2016 at 14:47 UTC
On article Throwback Thursday: Nikon D40 (173 comments in total)

Nothing wrong with those sample photos at all, they hold up well to scrutiny in 2016. High ISO isn't much of an option with the D40, obviously, but the camera is still quite capable all these years later. Same with my D50. It is limited to 1600 ISO but has a focus motor and can use many Nikon lenses, not just the DX ones. It still takes great photos and I still use it from time to time.

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2016 at 17:19 UTC as 21st comment

Wonderful camera and I may well upgrade from my M1 which is still going strong after heavy use the last couple of years. I am wondering about pricing though. Camera prices are just stupid here in Canada. Currently the M4 sells for $1249, the M3 for a little over $1000. The M5 is listed for pre-order at $1249, same as the M4. What gives? Is pricing of the older cameas going to be adjusted?

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2016 at 20:04 UTC as 29th comment | 1 reply
On article YI enters the mirrorless race with the M1 (55 comments in total)

Looks mysteriously like a Samsung.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 19:40 UTC as 11th comment | 1 reply

I have this lens and the 60mm 2.8 and 19mm 2.8 to complete the set. Still using these with my Nex-6. These are the only lenses I have for my Nex system and I am very happy with all of them. Wonderful image quality. The 30 1.4 is very sharp. I love the bokeh. It produces wonderful portraits as does the 60mm. If not for this trio of lenses I would have left Sony Nex a while back. At some point I'll upgrade to a 6300, but not just yet.

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2016 at 23:00 UTC as 58th comment | 1 reply
On article This film camera is 100% 3D-printed, including the lens (137 comments in total)

I wonder if you could print just the body with say a Nikon F lens mount, and then just attach a nice manual focus lens to the printed body? I really don't understand the hatred here for this. Seems like the guy is having some fun and experimenting...and film is still really great btw, just different.

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2016 at 22:54 UTC as 47th comment | 5 replies
On article Throwback Thursday: the Samsung NV10 (75 comments in total)

Reminds me of my first digital camera, an HP model, forget which. 2 whole megapixels and I paid a lot for it. Worst purchase ever. The pics looked terrible at any ISO under any lighting condition. This would have been the late 90s. I should have gotten a better film camera and a lens or two at the time and waited on digital. I actually have some shots from that camera stored on a hard drive. I try not to look at them.

Link | Posted on Sep 1, 2016 at 19:20 UTC as 34th comment
In reply to:

PPierre: And no affordable lens to go with it... Well done Sony !

PS: Releasing 3 FF lenses with this camera is either a proof that Sony needs to rethink its marketing department hiring policy, or an insanely rude way to tell Nex users that Sony doesn't care about Aps-c lenses anymore.

Exactly. When was the last time Sony released a NEX lens? How about any lens that was less than 1k?

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 21:41 UTC
On article The travel photography of HDR guru Trey Ratcliff (235 comments in total)

That first image is nice. The rest of them are nauseating. Not a fan.

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2015 at 14:49 UTC as 94th comment
On article #1 in France: Hands-on with DxO ONE (278 comments in total)

Looks incredibly awkward and a real pain in the backside to actually use. No thanks.

Link | Posted on Jun 18, 2015 at 14:35 UTC as 143rd comment
On article Meta35 pulls metadata from film cameras (38 comments in total)

I still shoot with my F100 so this is very nice. Definitely picking one up in the very near future.

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2015 at 22:39 UTC as 15th comment
On article Field Test: Sigma 19mm, 30mm and 60mm F2.8 DN lenses (166 comments in total)

The Sigma 60mm is my portrait lens for my Sony Nex 6. It delivers wonderful results. I also have the 19mm and while I do not use that focal length often, it too is a very good lens. I'll purchase the 30mm next. This 3 lens set-up is very familiar to me as my Contax G1 and 28mm, 45mm, and 90mm are very close in aperture and FL to the Sigma set (yes I still shoot film). Why no Nikon mount?

Link | Posted on May 9, 2015 at 00:34 UTC as 54th comment | 2 replies

Let's see what they mean by competitive and accessible. It looks like a Samsung mated with a Leica. I'm curious.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2015 at 22:43 UTC as 110th comment
On article Opinion: The myth of the upgrade path (1623 comments in total)

A sensible and logical outlook and very contrary to a lot of the nonsense that gets posted in the forums on this very website. A much needed reminder for many who visit here.

Link | Posted on Jan 8, 2015 at 20:51 UTC as 419th comment

Quiet and simple, the equipment isn't that important. That might be the only sensible thing I've ever read on this site. I really need to see the rest of the images to have an informed opinion, some of these are nice but others seem very random and off-topic.

Link | Posted on Sep 27, 2014 at 17:00 UTC as 17th comment

More affordable e mount lenses please. The Zeiss options are nice but I can't afford them.

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2014 at 13:20 UTC as 48th comment
Total: 49, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »