Everlast66

Lives in United Kingdom United Kingdom
Joined on Apr 29, 2011

Comments

Total: 924, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV review (506 comments in total)
In reply to:

Melchiorum: How to comment on DPR:

1. Find a review of the new product.
2. Study the specs and features offered by the product.
3. Think of a feature that the camera does not have. Don't worry about trivialities like camera cost, size, technical limitations.
4. Go into a comments and tell everyone how great the product would be and how you would totally buy it if only it had that missing feature (you may also throw in sensor size into the mix. Everyone knows sensors aren't ever large enough, so your argument will be valid no matter what).

There! You are now a highly liked DPR commenter, congratulations!

No EVF no buy .... oh wait

Link | Posted on Nov 15, 2017 at 14:25 UTC
On article Sony a7R III sample gallery (261 comments in total)
In reply to:

Amnon G: Did you notice the weird texture in the left eye of the model in the 3rd image? Looks very processed.
Also look at the right eye in photo #6.
I have never seen humans with patterns like this.

So this is over processing or we found the way to identify replicants ;-P

Anyway, on imaging-resource they had a comparison with Canikon and you can see the pattern on the other ones as well

http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/sony-a7r-iii/Z-A7RIII-comparison-images.jpg

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2017 at 15:49 UTC
On article Sony a7R III sample gallery (261 comments in total)
In reply to:

Amnon G: Did you notice the weird texture in the left eye of the model in the 3rd image? Looks very processed.
Also look at the right eye in photo #6.
I have never seen humans with patterns like this.

So this is over processing or we found the way to identify replicants ;-P

I told you she is one of them Reptilians ...

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2017 at 15:39 UTC
In reply to:

SmilerGrogan: Hopefully this will scare Canon and Nikon off their butts to start really doing something in the cinema space with their DSLRs. Right now they treat us like children who can't be trusted with ProRes or 4:2:2 color.

Nope, they are treating their customers like cash-cows and they will continue doing so until there is milk coming out.

Link | Posted on Oct 13, 2017 at 14:57 UTC

DJI will probably make a FF mirror-less before Canon and Nikon :)

Link | Posted on Oct 13, 2017 at 14:54 UTC as 34th comment | 4 replies

So Eye-AF now works with Canon lenses.

At this point I think Canon should start buying Sony A9 bodies, change their mount to EF, slap Canon badge on the front and resell as their own :)

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2017 at 12:15 UTC as 8th comment | 3 replies

I was hoping for a waterproof RX100 model, and although this is not quite it, this can be a replacement, with some interesting features. And supposedly it can take some punishment on top of that.

The majority of waterproof cameras on the market (Nikon AW, Ricoh WG, Oly TG) have tiny 1/2.3" or even 1/3" sensor.

Link | Posted on Aug 31, 2017 at 13:22 UTC as 120th comment

Are they going to share the source code with me, or am I supposed to buy this thing and reverse-engineer ?

Link | Posted on Aug 31, 2017 at 10:20 UTC as 6th comment

Canon launches a trio of tilt-shift lenses ... for their Sony e-mount users.

Link | Posted on Aug 31, 2017 at 10:17 UTC as 2nd comment
In reply to:

Beckler8: For spaceflight where mass and volume are always critical, you would have thought they'd go mirrorless. Maybe they too realize that while a bit better than a7, the a9 still has bad ergonomics compared to DSLRs like this. I'm not knocking either system just saying sony's minimalist design in a *camera* of all things is absurd.

Indeed, the cost of lifting 1kg to Space Station orbit is in the order of tens of thousands $, so minimising the weight will make a lot of sense.

But there are more factors, maybe NASA already have custom made F-mount glass, which could be insanely expensive to produce in small numbers.

Also they probably already have a ton of F-mount glass in orbit, so they are now only upgrading the bodies.

They might also have other hardware made to work with Nikon cameras, enclosures, etc.

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2017 at 00:09 UTC

It would be hilarious if a soviet-era Russian company beats Canon and Nikon to the full frame mirror-less camera market :)

Link | Posted on Aug 22, 2017 at 11:16 UTC as 51st comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

TwoMetreBill: Lens mount?

They should make it E-mount id possible :)

Link | Posted on Aug 22, 2017 at 11:11 UTC

This camera looks like someone's phone that was shot multiple times with 9mm and .22 rounds.

Link | Posted on Aug 4, 2017 at 08:25 UTC as 17th comment | 1 reply
On article Should I buy a Canon EOS 6D Mark II? (449 comments in total)
In reply to:

armandino: So basically, if you are using this cam as a photographic too the much older D750 beats the hell out of it, if you use it for video there are better tools.
However if you are satisfied by a well rounded, well built DULL camera you are welcome to overpay Canon.

@vscd
yes, it's always the engineers' fault. It doesn't matter, that the features and timeline are selected by the marketing people and company management.

It's the engineers that spend the money and have the difficult task to marry the cold laws of physics and the ambitions of management/marketing, that is not always possible. So it's always engineers' fault if a project fails.

But if a project succeeds, it's success for the marketing and management and they collect the rewards, because they brought a lot of money in.

Talking about fairness ...

Link | Posted on Jul 21, 2017 at 12:16 UTC
On article Sony a9 Full Review: Mirrorless Redefined (2754 comments in total)
In reply to:

Dante Birchen: Mirrorless redefined? It's a box with a mount and and a sensor in it and a screen and evf on the back with a bunch of buttons and dials. Nothing new. Mirrorless improved. Advancements come from sensor improvements (stacked) and increased processing power and a big battery to power it all.

Nope, the camera took his GF ;p

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2017 at 20:58 UTC
In reply to:

gphome: The future is mirrorless, everyone sees it, as shown in the sales

Amen.

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2017 at 20:16 UTC
In reply to:

ttran88: If you got a dslr within the past 5yrs there's really no reason to upgrade or buy another. Nothing much has improved to making your life easier.
Still need to micro adjust lenses ✔️ , Still need to Move focus points around or focus and recompose for portraits ✔️, shooting in live view still sucks ✔️, would still rather use your iPhone for videos ✔️, still loud and clunky ✔️, 100% viewfinder is for the rich only ✔️, still too heavy/big so it's collecting dust on the shelf ✔️. 😊

OP didn't say anything about mirror-less being better than DSLRs, people. No need for fanboys to jump on him.

The only thing he said, is that DSLRs practically reached their peak and there are only minimal improvements in the last 5 years.
This can NOT motivate people to buy new DSLRs, hence the DSLR market is declining.
Five - ten years ago, you would want the latest DSLR to get a NOTICEABLE bump in ISO, DR and AF speed, but that's no longer the case.

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2017 at 20:12 UTC
In reply to:

They call me Hans: INB4 obligatory MILC vs DSLR argument.

They call you Hans for a reason ...
he he, kidding :)

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2017 at 10:57 UTC
In reply to:

Chaitanya S: that tiny sensor though. I would love to see atleast a 1" sensor inside one of these rugged compacts.

With Sony's original RX100 with 1" sensor and Zeiss optics costing £290 new in the UK, some company should be able to make a waterproof version in the £400 range in 2017.
Even if it's £500-600 and a fixed focal length lens, still would be great.

Link | Posted on May 31, 2017 at 12:31 UTC
In reply to:

DPPMetro: The tradeoffs seem very reasonable for the ones who prioritize that speed and focusing. Basically, this is not a toy for hobbyists, though no doubt a large number of spec-sheet photographers on DPR will buy it so they can take challenging flower photos with it and then will complain.

@Photomonkey
Exactly what I was going to say - it's cat photos - who the hell takes flower photos.

Link | Posted on May 31, 2017 at 00:32 UTC
Total: 924, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »