digitalweddings

Joined on Nov 29, 2011

Comments

Total: 30, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

semorg: nicely done! I wonder if the movie was played backed in reverse or not.

indeed....one guy walking backwards at 00:28, also at 00:32

Link | Posted on Jun 20, 2017 at 07:56 UTC
In reply to:

Old Cameras: Kind of the last missing piece in inexpensive DX options, might even make its way into a bundled kit. Low cost of entry to have fun with ultra wide perspective on DX.

There has always been a need for a lower priced wide angle lens (and others..), Canon eventually saw the gap, and it took Nikon another 3 years like you correctly stated. My point is that Nikon does not lead anymore, they follow, and they don't listen to their customers needs. And yes they eventually offer solutions to gaps in their systems, but it takes years and years for them to fill these crucial gaps. And a lot of their recent products are either way too expensive (like the other 2 lenses announced with this wide angle lens), or they completely missed the plot (Keymission etc.)

Link | Posted on Jun 5, 2017 at 10:04 UTC
In reply to:

Old Cameras: Kind of the last missing piece in inexpensive DX options, might even make its way into a bundled kit. Low cost of entry to have fun with ultra wide perspective on DX.

yes....only 6 years late though

Link | Posted on May 31, 2017 at 07:38 UTC
On article Canon EOS Rebel T7i / 800D review (386 comments in total)
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: Is the review really only 2 pages? Is there no conclusion page for it?

This feels like half a review, if one can called it a review. Much less detailed than other sites. Sure it is an entry level camera, and an incremental update, and most regular visitors or experienced photographers here won't be bothered by a review on this camera anyway, but there is still a lot of beginners out there who rely on detailed reviews to make an informed buying decision. Most of us started with entry level gear back in the day. Add at least a conclusion part.

Link | Posted on May 4, 2017 at 09:20 UTC
In reply to:

Albert Valentino: Great work. Number 10 might give me nightmares 😱

thanks!

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2017 at 07:19 UTC
In reply to:

Albert Valentino: Great work. Number 10 might give me nightmares 😱

Amazing photos. What on earth is that creature in #10?

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2017 at 09:22 UTC
On article Throwback Thursday: the Nikon D80 (245 comments in total)
In reply to:

TacticDesigns: To be honest, seeing the Nikon D80 as a Throw Back Thursday camera really caught me off guard. LOL. When I think of TBT I think of stuff that makes you think, wow that was really cool in its day, or . . . what was everyone thinking about in those days. But the D80, to me, is still a contemporary camera. I'd have no problem picking one up and just using it. :)

Just shows you how good it is for a camera that is 10 years old:)

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2017 at 12:11 UTC

Pictures??? I only see one

Link | Posted on Jan 28, 2017 at 09:47 UTC as 41st comment | 1 reply

No

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2017 at 09:59 UTC as 35th comment
In reply to:

skanter: Ho hum - who cares about iPhone rumors, especially having to do with its camera? Is this not a forum for photographers who have real cameras? Phone are just not that interesting any more.

why do you click on the link when it says Iphone in the title???

Link | Posted on Dec 28, 2016 at 09:35 UTC
In reply to:

KoenDevisschere: My 2 cents:
They dumped the SD slot because people were using it to extend the storage capacity of their system. I know many people using a SD card as external harddrive for their photo's, video's etc. Of course Apple wants people to pay for an upgrade to the internal SSD drive, after they sold a kidney.

sd card to expand macbook storage works very nice, card is also shorter, so it fits flush with the side of laptop. Very sad that they removed it

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2016 at 09:02 UTC
On article An introduction to our studio test scene (111 comments in total)
In reply to:

digitalweddings: Why is you Studio shot comparison tool not updated with the latest cameras? Pity as it is a stunning tool, and nice to check out how cameras compare in terms of low light etc, but basic models like the XT-1, 70D, D810 (to name a few), are not available for comparison ??Interesting article, thanks.

wow thanks!!

Link | Posted on Aug 10, 2016 at 08:28 UTC
On article An introduction to our studio test scene (111 comments in total)

Why is you Studio shot comparison tool not updated with the latest cameras? Pity as it is a stunning tool, and nice to check out how cameras compare in terms of low light etc, but basic models like the XT-1, 70D, D810 (to name a few), are not available for comparison ??Interesting article, thanks.

Link | Posted on Aug 8, 2016 at 12:23 UTC as 54th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Adam Sharp: Well having tried to make the swap to Fuji only to open cameras and lenses with mega dirty sensors and lenses with dust and marks all over them I feel like Fuji should try to sort out Qc and that would make me really happy . I send my new camera back to be cleaned and comes back the same .not good . I open new sealed lenses to find not a little but loads of dust and marks on and in them . Yes all lenses have dust but never like I've seen new Fuji lenses . Sellers tell me when Fuji first started x series cameras lenses they were perfect and now we see this issue time and time again . Well Fuji please send me good copies lenses and cameras you will have my money .

no problem here - selling them everyday....might be that your supplier has tested or used them....

Link | Posted on Jul 15, 2016 at 12:45 UTC
In reply to:

BattleBrat: No Canon, you're too late! I have gone Micro Four Thirds for my portable setup and I'm not going back! (Loving that Oly EM5) I had an EOS M, gave it to my girlfriend. I will use your 6D for my Zeiss glass and your 1N for film, but if you don't get your mirrorless act together I'm going to go back to Sony for my studio toys (My first real camera was a DSC-R1)

fuji xt1......:)

Link | Posted on Aug 27, 2015 at 06:31 UTC
In reply to:

Michel F: Nikon is so not on the ball these days. It's time for a management change and with it a change in company philosophy. In the last few years they seem to have utterly lost their way. Being more transparent with their loyal customers would be a good start.

true....but they had all the time in the world...

Link | Posted on Aug 24, 2015 at 06:16 UTC

Elinchrom should rather focus on product quality, their triggers feels like a $2 chinese toy, generics at a quarter of the price are of much better built quality. Had a couple of them now that just fell apart.

Link | Posted on Aug 14, 2015 at 08:29 UTC as 5th comment
On article Samsung launches Galaxy Note 5 and Galaxy S6 Edge+ (160 comments in total)
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: I was just telling someone the advantages of the Samsung phones over the iPhone last night. The two biggest reasons in my opinion were the replaceable battery and the mini-sd slot. Without those two things you might as well buy an iPhone. Samsung has lost their minds with these new phones. The "edge" feature is a gimmick no one wanted.

People tend to forget about LG, their products including phones and tv's are actually far superior to Samsung, although not marketed as well.

Link | Posted on Aug 14, 2015 at 08:22 UTC

200-500....$1399. wow! .... just 5 years to late. Think most people interested in a lens like this, in this price class, were forced to buy a tamron or sigma 500/600mm by now. I did. In the meantime, Nikon released the one DX lens after another...while most companies are gearing up for full frame. And mark these words, they will be to late when they finally discover that they are behind in the mirrorless game. I mean, their pro cameras that still don't have Wi-Fi? D300 replacement? Listen to wat your customers really want Nikon, otherwise you will loose them forever. Already lost me.

Link | Posted on Aug 4, 2015 at 09:49 UTC as 69th comment | 1 reply
Total: 30, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »