BokehBro

Great addition to the nikon Z mount! now anyone can own a noctilux :) or the best alternative to the noct!

LOL

There's also the Sigma DG DN line of lenses (primes and zooms) for the Sony E and Leica L mounts, which are just as good (just as sharp, different rendering) as Canon's best RF lenses at a fraction...

Same, the 105 is a baby 200mm f2! I've tried the 135mm focal length, it's too far from the subject, 105 is where i draw the line, plus the 105 sigma is truly a portrait photographer's dream, the...

@ Astro lanscapes
You're a joke. You're paying $200 for an older gen third party lens just because it has nikon written on it, blind loyalty to a brand that doesn't have more third party support...

Read you like a book, factual on all accounts.

I have the right to free speech. I can call cash grab if I see one (rebadged first gen tamrons forcing you to pay for the logo - a slap in the face...

@photography-lover I think even Matt Granger, That Nikon Guy, admitted RF 50 is sharper. I don't think you watched any comparisons on these two lenses I'm gonna end the discussion here. It's clear...

@photography-lover yes, I talk about bokeh and rendering because 1. I've shot with different systems 2. Never claimed objective superiority over nikon, it's my personal opinion. Sharpness is where...

@photography-lover
Everything you've said is subjective. Especially rendering and bokeh. If you like Nikon's, good for you, but most portrait photographers I know and follow are Canon shooters. ...

@photography-lover
I have actually shot with all systems I mentioned earlier, and their best primes. RF glass is outstanding and my favorite. There's a reason why it outsells Nikon. They also make...

@sporty accordy you hit it on the mark! Well put. I really like the RF glass, and I do believe you can get a $4k kit used, but not new (eos r +rf 50mm 1.2 + Sigma 105mm 1.4). If you go lower, then...

@Astro Landscapes I agree with everything you've said in your last comments. Canon costs thousands, their L RF lenses are pricey, but their performance justifies their price if you compare to...

@ Astro Landscapes it seems the discussion got a little personal there for you. It's clear you have not shot both mounts, just a nikon fan boy. A manufacturer's color science and the rendition of...

@Astro Landscapes - had to continue in a different comment, word limit.
I have shot with Nikon Z7II, Nikon Z7, Nikon Z6, all the 1.8 Z primes, the Z 50mm 1.2 prime, and while they are very good,...

@Astro Landscapes My opinion is based on actual experience, other photographers I personally know, and photographers i follow on social media sites (that share the gear used). People that...

@photography-lover @larkhon
Canon is dominating not based on the cheap cameras you're mentioning. you obviously have not tried any of the RF glass and cameras, its a step above in every way...

@phtography-lover Yes, i would love to see Canon allow some third party "collaborations", but they are leading the market in sales with Sony, so no need to get desperate. From business...

What a cash grab on Nikon's part! Taking Tamron lenses and selling them for 50% more! It's only steering more people to jump ship to Sony! Too bad, the nikon sensors are stellar.

The R6 will have much better autofocus, for video and stills. The panasonic S5 strength lies in its lenses. The only lenses worth buying for the Canon RF are very expensive, and if you add the RF...

Besides the focal length, it would be hard to justify this over an autofocus Sigma 35mm 1.4, which also comes in substantially smaller/lighter.