Krummj

I have the XS, and shooting raw with Halide it works quite well. I process the file in Lightroom on the phone. I would say they have caught up to the raw quality of my old Panasonic LX3. Not bad at...

On the Superior Hiking Trail in Duluth... A mountain ash near Lake Superior... The cliffs in Congdon Park reflected in Tischer Creek, in Duluth, MN.

No idea on sharpness, but A has a nicer, richer look, with more contrast. C is second, B third.

Lens looks nice, maybe it's the emperor. But I would call him the cheesy crescendo music king.

I took it out and tested it with the XH-1 and I don't see the smears with the crop. It's so sharp in the middle and at just the right frequency that it show the "worms" more easily at Lightroom ...

I'm still in "testing" phase with the X-H1, like these with the adapted Pentax 28 2.8 F. Seems pretty good at close to middle distances, though not spectacular at infinity. New chemistry building ...

Thanks Erik. The difference I see (with all the same settings, profile, etc) is very subtle so likely won't matter to most. X-Transformer Lightroom As you can see, pretty small, but it's also ...

I've been using Iridient-X Transformer and directly comparing it to regular Lightroom default sharpening with XH-1 files. It does have a nicer look to the details, but it also loses some ...

I have that lens, the f4 20mm k.  but unfortunately mine is very soft on the left side, smeary. In the middle it is extremely good. Must be some kind of misalignment. I already sent it in to Eric ...

XH1 and 23 f2.

After a few weeks of ownership, I have few quibbles. My favorite camera to use. But for small improvements: (1) I’d like a vertical level in addition to the horizontal level. The level needs better ...

I actually just bought it a week ago and will send it back. It appears to only take a smallish crop of the frame. I was hoping I could shoot raw with Halide and get then reverse the negative. Nice...