AlbertTheLazy

Fine. So you need a camera that can cope with low temperatures and still be easy to use. What landscapes need 960 fps? That has absolutely no bearing on 'solely for landscapes'.

It is a 'good place to start' for most types of camera, but you can get away with spending much less. None of which are very demanding. Ideally, but you'd be surprised how far even a decent ...

... A true 'point and shoot' is just that -- hardly any controls and most of them are no better than a decent phone camera. Unfortunately the point and shoot market is almost dead because of the ...

Taking that literally, I believe the only true rangefinder digital cameras are made by Leica -- not cheap. The Canon M50 does not have an optical viewfinder. It is not even 'viewfinder style', ...

What camera? What lens?

They certainly won't have the Z mount. It is totally incompatible with a reflex mirror.

I have the 27mm and use it probably more than any of my other Fujinons (18, 35 and 18-135). The small size and semi-wide angle of view suit my style. Most of these examples are from my son's ...

As far as I know there are no speedboosters (focal reducers) for mounting on any DSLR body. They need space between the lens flange and the body mount to fit in the necessary optics so I doubt if ...

Which lens? Typical kit zoom with a maximum aperture of about f:3.5 at the wide end. Could you explain what action shots you want to take and why your present camera won't do the trick? Are you ...

If video is important to you then no entry level DSLR will satisfy you. You need either a mirrorless camera or dedicated video camera (ideal for video, but no good for stills). The whole reason for ...

Define 'better'. MFT or APS-C with decent interchangeable lenses will give a huge gain in image quality over the P900, but you will have a big shock when you start buying a system to try to ...

You really should ask this in the Fuji X forum.

I generally shoot in raw plus JPEG for very similar reasons. You can always delete raws for images you know will never be competition material. If you process your raw images you can also use more ...

If you are pixel peeping at 1:1 then very few, if any cameras will produce noiseless results at high-ish ISO. The more recent the sensor the less objectionable it may be, but it's a fact. Do you ...

Actually, according to your sig you take pictures of C reation . That covers any and everything from the sub-microscopic to the Milky Way and beyond. Not a very precise indicator of your interests. ...

If it is 'not about the light' then why specify 'low light'? Wrong! I have shot cinema audiences handheld in extremely low light. I was using fast primes where some of my colleagues were using kit ...

Insufficient data for a meaningful answer. Define 'low light'. Specify static or moving subjects. Tripod? Can you add light (flash etc.)?

I suggest that you stop asking hypothetical questions and start defining for yourself what you want to achieve. You have another current thread about FF v crop in 'low light', without defining ...

Funny, it was your idea! Please explain how you derive that conclusion from my question. Please explain how you derive that conclusion from my question. Please explain how you derive that ...

Join the club.