AlbertTheLazy

It is possible to stitch together images using panorama software. You would need to set up the shooting really carefully but the software can be cheap or free. Quite honestly you would probably be ...

For at least the last half century I've subscribed to the opinion that cameras can't lie but photographers can, and often do.

But as you seem unable to decide which one is sharpest in an earlier post, I suggest you use Leonard's logic of deciding by zoom range or by convenience and small size.

I can't be sure without actually visiting the venue, but it looks as though you could stand a bit closer but to left. In other words, roughly along the line of those cables but about 2 yards ...

So I assume that you are the 'official' photographer, even if unpaid. Yes? So you should be able to stand pretty much where you like! Is this image straight out of camera of have you processed it ...

Why? For a start, it's 'macro', with the 'c' before the 'r'. Marco is probably some Italian bloke. Secondly, each of the lenses in that set cost about 6 quid each and you want to put them in front ...

Could you two take this sparkling repartee to private message?Franco, just because someone answered to the wrong person is no reason to clutter up the thread.

Why? Those two lenses will cover probably 95% of all outdoor photographic situations. What do you want to shoot that one or other of them won't handle? Your two lenses should handle all of this. ...

Are those one or two element lenses? Makes a huge difference. What sort of size subjects are you looking to shoot? In this thread I've seen recommendations for the Canon 500D and the Raynox 150 and ...

Given your first paragraph I'm not surprised. Fair enough. Sensible. Ah! Interesting approach! That would be my approach. But then that's what I have -- Fuji rather than Canon, though. However, I ...

Loads of them, at least in France and the UK.

Yes. No. On my X-T1 the equivalent of the old 'match needle' readout doesn't change, and nor does the histogram. On my Canon G15 the 'match needle' doesn't change, relative to the centre point of ...

So a FF system, even with a relatively small body like the A7 family, would not seem like a good idea. Maybe even going for M4/3, but... Sounds like a case for investigating other makes. You can ...

Are the ergos of the A7 series that much better than the A6xxx series? Actually, it sounds like 'should I change to another make?' That's a more difficult question.

From your description of your shooting habits i'd guess that you probably are not using your A6500 anywhere near its limits. Why upgrade?

So why whinge about it getting you 'frustrated'?

You have just puzzled me. As far as I can tell, the exposure compensation dial has absolutely no effect if shooting fully manual. On my X-T1 I've just set the aperture, shutter speed and ISO ...

In answer to your title question, I'd doubt it in most developed countries. So switching to a bridge camera gets rid of the extra lenses. It won't help you to get rid of  'filters, 5 flashes, ...

You have those three in the right order of priority. There is a reason why the head shooter on feature films is usually called the 'Lighting Cameraman'. I want a vehicle that will let me run a taxi ...