Suhas Sudhakar Kulkarni

Now I know why those cuppa noodles in market test weired... they are made out if film emulsions !

Its sad news. I liked the Nikon 1 System...

I was expectimg this lens, but thought Canon will do it with their DO optics.
The price will be very high I guess around 4000-5000$

Gigapixels... so the megapixel race is officially over :-)

Thanks for checking this!

Thanks for the help! Guess I will try Paintshop Pro 2018 for a few days and buy it soon. My initial thought is Paintshop Pro has lot more features than DXO Optics Pro, but it lacks camera/lens ...

Hi, I have been using DXO optics pro 11 for some time now.  Recently I purchased panasonic gx9 and tried to edit , but dxo says its unrecognised camera.Now DXO has stopped Optics Pro line and is ...

Sorry read *optimised

After trying few mirrorless I feel the digitised representation of the scene is either too ootimised (which hides the flaws in the scene) or too bad (inconsistant colors etc). IMHO the OVF is...

Does this mean we have 5x magnification for m43? Is this magnification defined in terms of 35mm full frame sensor area?
Olympus says its 1.25x macro lens gives effective magnification of 2.5x.
I...

Looks great on paper. Lightweight too. I will buy one when I got enough money..

There is another flaw... no m43 mount :-(

This is really a good gesture from a camera manufacturer, I think others should follow. If Panasonic offers upgrade to gx9 from my gx85 at 1/4th the cost of the camera, I will be so happy to take...

"budget option for Leica users"
I like that!

Given Nikon 200-400 VR II sells for about $7K at B&H, this $12K lens must have to be much better in terms of optics and performance... unless someone is lazy to avoid puttin 1.4x TC and wants it to...

@tkbslc, I was joking :-)
I know there are large aperture lenses, including f/0.95 and there is nothing new here.

"hair-thin depth of focus [that] isolates subjects with extreme precision"
So if you are shooting a model with focus on a hair, Only the hair will be in focus and everything else will be a smooth...

Hey do you read what you write?
Tell me why you are entitled to compare 400mm f2.8 full frame vs 200mm f2.8 m43, AND you can not compare 400mm f2.8 on fz300 vs 200mm f2.8 lens on m43? You shoul...

OK, so when comparing with fz300 you will bring in the point of small sensor, depth of field etc. But when comparing between ff and m43 you will ignore those points!
BTW I am not comparing fz300...

Futgermore, 400mm f5.6 on full frame and 200mm f2.8 om m43 will give exactly same experience and depth of field. Only thing we will need to bump up iso for ff lens, but hey who bothers about iso on...