Lives in United States United States
Joined on Jun 21, 2009


Total: 2075, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

The apps the thing by which we'll fool the king.

Link | Posted on May 23, 2018 at 13:26 UTC as 41st comment

Maybe, leave well enough alone, then.

Link | Posted on May 22, 2018 at 15:53 UTC as 317th comment

Don't disturb dinosaurs.

Link | Posted on May 22, 2018 at 13:58 UTC as 385th comment | 3 replies

Link | Posted on May 21, 2018 at 20:20 UTC as 19th comment

Sounds like a fair plan.

Link | Posted on May 15, 2018 at 18:28 UTC as 38th comment

Are we going backward or forward.

Link | Posted on May 15, 2018 at 12:14 UTC as 10th comment | 2 replies

But no one wants to carry a camera with them.

Link | Posted on May 10, 2018 at 21:06 UTC as 70th comment
On photo Fruits in Aziz Ali's photo gallery (2 comments in total)

Great photo. This is why Nikon still rules the roost!

Link | Posted on May 7, 2018 at 02:38 UTC as 2nd comment
On article DPReview TV: Fujifilm X-H1 Review (549 comments in total)

Great new feature on DPReview. Keep it multimedia.

Link | Posted on May 7, 2018 at 02:36 UTC as 41st comment

Thanks. I hope you do a proper review and look at the printing function. These is where many "other" photo apps not named Adobe fall down.

Link | Posted on Apr 30, 2018 at 20:18 UTC as 33rd comment
In reply to:

NCB: Think it's a mistake if they don't do a DX mirrorless as well. They need something like a more compact, lighter, mirrorless equivalent to the D7500 to remain competitive.

Yes. Something to compete with Fuji in that area? And the EOS-M is slowly moving to enthusiast arena.

Link | Posted on Apr 30, 2018 at 14:22 UTC

Exciting news. Take your time and get it done right. Nikon is a modern imaging legend and should be one of its leaders. Those loyal to Nikon, i.e. working professionals, will be patient. The real test might be how good the AF is for photojournalists, wildlife photographers, etc.

Link | Posted on Apr 30, 2018 at 14:21 UTC as 183rd comment
On article Why smartphone cameras are blowing our minds (448 comments in total)
In reply to:

anticipation_of: All of these things and more could have been done by traditional camera-makers, if they had just had a little bit of actual vision. People like to complain about the $1000 cost of flagship phones these days, but they do things that the class-leading, cutting-edge A7III doesn't—at half the price. Plus they do an infinite number of other things. Many phones are even IPX7-rated—show me the camera that can say that. Cameras don't even list their screen resolutions as pixel dimensions, instead giving them as "mdots" to obscure how pathetic they actually are. I would like to see more phone features being built into cameras with larger senses and more powerful optics. I would like to see cameras that can run apps; why not a camera that actually runs Android? I would like to see cameras that don't have menu interfaces that look like they come straight from 2003. If smartphones are eating camera makers' lunches, it's because camera makers have been inexcusably complacent for decades now.

Exactly, gatesbuster and anticipation_of.
Samsung and Panasonic saw this, but retreated from their camera phones.

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2018 at 18:29 UTC
On article DPReview TV Episode 1: Sony a7 III review (347 comments in total)

Great idea.

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2018 at 15:37 UTC as 132nd comment

No different than all the AI filters/masks/double images on all the smartphones and, soon, cameras. AI Baby. Just do it!

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2018 at 01:09 UTC as 94th comment
In reply to:

Wye Photography: I would rather use a Seagull

Yes, and how is that new Yashica camera doing.

Link | Posted on Apr 26, 2018 at 20:41 UTC

So, so, so, so, sad. Don't humiliate a great name like that.

Link | Posted on Apr 26, 2018 at 20:40 UTC as 105th comment


Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2018 at 22:16 UTC as 8th comment
In reply to:

inlawbiker: I'm trying to figure out why this is relevant. Sure, Nikon's name is attached. But this is just a re-published press release ending with a question mark as to what this means. Couldn't DPReview do some like, research? Maybe draw a conclusion one way or another?

This is the problem with this practice. Any press release should only be the jumping off point for a report.

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2018 at 15:23 UTC

Shades of Olympus?

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2018 at 15:21 UTC as 5th comment | 1 reply
Total: 2075, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »