luigibozi

luigibozi

Lives in Canada Toronto, Canada
Joined on Oct 12, 2011

Comments

Total: 162, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Four thirds was the common mount adopted by some companies. Nowadays we don't hear about four thirds, the "standard" 1/4 is Micro Four Thirds.
In my opinion (for the photographers benefit) / dreams (these companies will never-ever do this) Nikon and Canon should embrace the E mount for their FF. And slowly FF will become Micro Full Frame analogous to FT->MFT. Then will be a real competition (read: on the same grounds) between lenses and bodies. Nikon and Canon could focus at the beginning on the cameras, and then introduce lenses.
Oh, and cameras SHOULD switch from SD to SSD, of course.

Link | Posted on May 23, 2017 at 18:56 UTC as 71st comment | 1 reply
On article Nikon reshuffles management structure (244 comments in total)
In reply to:

inorogNL: is it time to jump the ship ?

Which item in your wish list do you refer to?

Link | Posted on May 20, 2017 at 01:56 UTC
On article Nikon reshuffles management structure (244 comments in total)

A healthy way to celebrate the centennial.

Link | Posted on May 20, 2017 at 01:47 UTC as 44th comment
In reply to:

adventure_photo: Seems great but I'm all out of arms and legs!

Usually, that's gone first...

Link | Posted on May 18, 2017 at 07:50 UTC
On article Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM sample gallery (96 comments in total)

Since Oct 16, 2013 it's like 3 and a half years. How many companies had a complete FF system in such a short time?

Link | Posted on May 17, 2017 at 20:48 UTC as 10th comment | 11 replies
In reply to:

panther fan: So now Sony has:

Wide Angle zoom:

12-24 F4 G

16-35 F4 Sony/Zeiss OSS

16-35 F2.8 GM

Midrange zoom:

28-70 F3.5-5.6 OSS

24-70 F4 Sony/Zeiss OSS

24-70 F2.8 GM

24-240 F3.5-6.3 OSS

28-135 F4 G PZ OSS

Tele zoom:

70-200 F4 G OSS

70-200 F2.8 GM OSS

70-300 F4.5-5.6 G OSS

100-400 F4.5-5.6 GM OSS

Wide angle prime:

18mm F2.8 Batis

21mm F2.8 Loxia

25mm F2 Batis

Medium wide angle:

28mm F2

35mm F1.4 Sony/Zeiss

35mm F2.8 Sony/Zeiss

Standard:

50mm F1.8

50mm F2.8 Macro

50mm F2 Loxia

55mm F1.8 Sony/Zeiss

50mm F1.4 Sony/Zeiss

Portrait:

85mm F1.8

85mm F1.8 Batis OSS

85mm F1.4 GM

90mm F2.8 Macro OSS

100mm F2.8 STF GM OSS

135mm F2.8 Batis OSS

And all that complem­ented by

Samyang 14mm F2.8 AF

Samyang 35mm F2.8 AF

Samyang 50mm F1.4 AF

I think we can say that not many lenses are missing

yep

Link | Posted on May 17, 2017 at 18:17 UTC
On article Zeiss formally announces Batis 135mm F2.8 (182 comments in total)

Noblesse oblige. Use meaning no.2 :
"The Dictionnaire de l'Académie française defines it thus:
1 [...]
2 (Figuratively) One must act in a fashion that conforms to one's position and with the reputation that one has earned." (wikipedia)

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2017 at 19:37 UTC as 31st comment

search google for: "miroslav tichy camera"

Link | Posted on Apr 4, 2017 at 15:44 UTC as 24th comment

and the right spelling would be....?!

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2017 at 02:46 UTC as 76th comment | 1 reply

I would love to have an E-mount Foveon FF sensor camera...
Doesn't matter the brand

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2017 at 01:44 UTC as 21st comment | 1 reply

Between 2008-2013 they had around 16 camera models per year. They won't come with more than one NEW camera model per month. It sounds fair to me (although I'm really not interested in less than FF)

Link | Posted on Mar 28, 2017 at 01:07 UTC as 69th comment | 1 reply
On article Re-make/Re-model: Leica Summaron 28mm F5.6 Samples (202 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ebrahim Saadawi: Since mosr phones are 28mm equivalent, and dince the image quality is quite poor, I really do see better 28mm photographs from an Iphone or Samsung or others. Very boring look coupled with low IQ makes a boring image list.

I can get markedly higher quality images from my 60D + 28mm prime. And there's a 24mm pancake if we went that argument of size.

whose low IQ you're talking about?

Link | Posted on Mar 24, 2017 at 18:50 UTC
In reply to:

Alex Efimoff: Why did you call it a 'photo shoot'?

maybe "environmental damage"? a lot of smoke around...

Link | Posted on Jan 31, 2017 at 21:04 UTC
In reply to:

sh10453: Who funds / sponsors such photo shoots? The camera manufacturer?

doubt it looking at the guy with the 'oxygen' laptop :)

Link | Posted on Jan 31, 2017 at 16:16 UTC
On article DJI reportedly takes majority stake in Hasselblad (191 comments in total)

the article is not subscriber only -> we can read it :)

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2017 at 04:18 UTC as 40th comment

we'll see again laundry hanged out to dry...

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2017 at 23:11 UTC as 102nd comment
In reply to:

luigibozi: I understand that's the minimum requirement, so what's wrong?!

That's really great
Happy New Year, man

Link | Posted on Dec 31, 2016 at 04:06 UTC
In reply to:

luigibozi: I understand that's the minimum requirement, so what's wrong?!

My understanding was that you don't go with an iPhone to shoot a wedding, so you need at least a canon or nikon.
But I see what you're talking about: a wedding photographer needs another photographer as equipment ... pretty cool figure of speech.

Link | Posted on Dec 30, 2016 at 05:39 UTC

I understand that's the minimum requirement, so what's wrong?!

Link | Posted on Dec 29, 2016 at 13:56 UTC as 146th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

Frank Neunemann: I keep waiting for the pink version. ;-) :-)

@ Frank: same here, and for the pink new MBP

Link | Posted on Nov 16, 2016 at 18:32 UTC
Total: 162, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »