Babka08

Lives in Canada Canada
Joined on Oct 17, 2006

Comments

Total: 122, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Meet the Canon PowerShot G1 X III (327 comments in total)
In reply to:

Babka08: Not sure this has anything on an Olympus OM10-II with all its lens options, including pancake zooms, fast primes and ridiculously small ultra-wides and even telephotos. Or for that matter, a Sony a6300 with kit zoom and all its additional lens options (though micro 4/3rds kills Sony in terms of small lens options).

Get over what? I'm really happy over here.

Link | Posted on Oct 19, 2017 at 15:27 UTC
In reply to:

Babka08: We all, slaves to Adobe. They own their category. I just wish they didn't have the WORST (x1,000) customer service on the planet. Cough up a little profit for some knowledgeable staff, there, Adobe. You're at the bottom of the trash bin in this regard.

There aren't alternatives when you work in design/communications and also need Illustrator and InDesign. Photoshop and Lightroom just seem to make sense when you're already subscribing to the creative suite. Great products. Horrible customer service. What are the alternatives for a full design suite that is compatible with the industry??

Link | Posted on Oct 19, 2017 at 15:26 UTC
On article Meet the Canon PowerShot G1 X III (327 comments in total)

Not sure this has anything on an Olympus OM10-II with all its lens options, including pancake zooms, fast primes and ridiculously small ultra-wides and even telephotos. Or for that matter, a Sony a6300 with kit zoom and all its additional lens options (though micro 4/3rds kills Sony in terms of small lens options).

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2017 at 05:00 UTC as 77th comment | 3 replies

We all, slaves to Adobe. They own their category. I just wish they didn't have the WORST (x1,000) customer service on the planet. Cough up a little profit for some knowledgeable staff, there, Adobe. You're at the bottom of the trash bin in this regard.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2017 at 03:40 UTC as 69th comment | 6 replies
On article Canon EOS Rebel SL2 / EOS 200D Review (565 comments in total)

This is a stills SLR primarily, in a small size. Pentax owns this category, and they have the equally tiny lenses to go with. And here's the #1 issue under consideration that the reviewers gloss over: the viewfinder. Pentax committed to pentaprism finders a while back, and it makes all the difference on every shot. For those of us who have tried (good) EVF's and just can't stand them compared to a good optical finder, the little viewfinder in the SL models totally misses the mark. I'll just use my teeny tiny Olympus OMD10ii with its teeny tiny lenses and it's biggy wiggy EVF. Conversely if you're using an LCD, or you like EVF's (did I mention I don't?) why wouldn't you go mirrorless if you want a small camera? Not sure at all what is the why of the SL2. I like the idea...until I look through the tunnel to try and compose a photo.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2017 at 03:36 UTC as 46th comment | 7 replies

It's success will be all about the lenses, how quickly they come out with a wide selection, and then whether they get into adapters like Sony. They can't overlook the success Sony have had with adapters. APSC doesn't make sense for Nikon because of the 1 Series. They'd kill that dead if they went APSC mirrorless.

But it's the approach to lenses that'll make it or break it. Too bad though, EVF's either way. Yuck. Don't like em.

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2017 at 04:18 UTC as 108th comment

My first DSLR and it catapulted me back into photography. Found a bag full of top-shelf Minolta lenses on Craigslist right after, including the amazing 200mm f/2.8, 35mm f/2 and 50mm f/2.8 macro. Still some of my best shots.

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2017 at 02:20 UTC as 13th comment
On article Hands-on with the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III (204 comments in total)

Looks like this should have been named Mark 2.1...
I guess 4K video if that's important to you, and I guess to keep up with Panasonic.

Link | Posted on Sep 1, 2017 at 05:29 UTC as 32nd comment
In reply to:

M Chambers: So how is this better than just connecting the camera and phone via wifi?

If your camera doesn't have wifi. And I'm guessing this will be an instantaneous and non-finicky connection (which is what so many wifi connections are not).

Link | Posted on Aug 30, 2017 at 18:30 UTC
In reply to:

AbrasiveReducer: I realize it's the end of summer but really, this is just filler. Both cameras have been tested and anyone considering spending $2000 on a 6D2 already knows the pros and cons of full frame. If you didn't know this, why would you even consider a 6D2?

Tons! The #1 consideration for me is the viewfinder. It frames and influences/determines every single shot. I've used apsc, full-frame, 4/3rds and now I'm back to full-frame mainly for this reason. And while I've tried, I just can't like an EVF; for me an OVF is it, and full-frame gives you the best view. #2 is the depth of focus control. I like to be able to throw things creatively out of focus. #3 is image quality, especially when printing large. I can't begin to compare a 4/3rds image to what I get from Canon or Nikon full-frame. Apsc is less of a difference but still lower quality. And the basic fast/prime lenses for DSLR are way better value than the high priced primes from Sony and Fuji. I bought my latest D600 used for under $1000 with a 50/1.8G attached. Got an 85/1.8 and a 24/2.8. Couldn't be happier for well under $2000. Full-frame is a lot more satisfying and worthwhile experience for my stills photography. My first paid outdoor portraiture shoot proved this again.

Link | Posted on Aug 13, 2017 at 21:19 UTC

The new range of Sigma lenses are so much nicer designed than previous and also than Tamron. Somebody high up in Sigma has really revolutionized that part of their business.

Link | Posted on Jun 23, 2017 at 04:35 UTC as 20th comment | 3 replies

iPhone 7?
(honestly, it's hard to bring along my Oly OMD 10ii + Pan 20/1.7ii when the phone is always in my pocket)

For a while I had a Canon 6D with 40/2.8 and Voigtlander 20/3.5 pancakes. Not your classic rangefinder, but pretty compact full-framer.

Link | Posted on May 23, 2017 at 23:58 UTC as 20th comment

I've had apsc, then full-frame, then apsc, then full-frame, and now I have Olympus 4/3rds. I bought it for lenses like the Olympus 9-18 ultra-wide angle, which is the size of three Oreo cookies, and the Panasonic 35-100 telephoto, which is the size of three peanut butter flavoured Oreo cookies. The whole kit weighs less than a single full-frame zoom. And, the price of the body and the lenses is one third to one quarter that of a full-frame setup. Shopped for Sony lenses lately? What's not to like if you want a small kit for travel, hiking and taking lots of great pictures, and you understand the pros and cons of the sensor size? Lot's of reasons for 4/3rds. (Olympus, just fix your botched firmware and stop offending your valued customers with sugar coating.)

Link | Posted on Dec 9, 2016 at 03:28 UTC as 6th comment
On article Spoilt for choice: which Sony RX100 is right for you? (307 comments in total)
In reply to:

bzanchet: I still have the original RX100. I bought all the next generations up to the IV and returned them all. The original still has the best JPEG for low ISO, best DR, best colors (at Landscape mode) and the best skintone (portrait mode).

Good that you think the quality is so high. I have the original and have only thought of upgrading.

Link | Posted on Nov 15, 2016 at 04:30 UTC

This reminds me of the proprietary video cables they used to use before going VGA like the rest of the universe. I've been using Macs since 1990. This is the first time I've thought about switching.

Link | Posted on Nov 9, 2016 at 05:37 UTC as 13th comment

If you combine this camera with this article: http://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2016/10/31/how-to-hack-a-drone-researcher-develops-method-to-take-control-of-consumer ... you're in trouble.

Link | Posted on Nov 3, 2016 at 16:00 UTC as 6th comment
On article Fast Five: Sony Cyber-shot RX100 V Review (433 comments in total)

It's a point and shoot. I still have the original RX100. As noted in this review, the interface of these cameras funnel them into the camp of point-and-shoot. And despite the great photo quality, technology and lenses Sony uses, it's frankly a boring camera for a photographer to get engaged in. I enjoy my iPhone 6+ experience with the 5.5" screen and always there pocketability. And then I jump to my interchangeable lens camera and skip the RX100.

Link | Posted on Nov 3, 2016 at 15:51 UTC as 87th comment

I'd have preferred if they had simply added a DC motor to the existing 55-300. It's a much faster lens and has good optics.

Link | Posted on Jun 8, 2016 at 23:11 UTC as 18th comment | 2 replies
On article Upwardly mobile: Sony a6300 Review (2166 comments in total)
In reply to:

bobfonte: I agree: Great Review!
It's not hate. But unrequited love. I'm rooting soon Sony has a range of good quality and affordable lenses. Then I'll be in the front row defending it and hoping for success.

Like what, say, Canon and Nikon offer. Or Olympus. Or Panasonic. As opposed to luxuriously priced Sony and Ziess lenses? Maybe? Perhaps? But it's a nice body to go with whatever lenses you want to spend heaps of money on.

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2016 at 15:49 UTC
In reply to:

bluevellet: That 18-50 compact sounds intriguing. I would like the mechanical shutter to be faster, but I understand this is a common limitation with those cameras.

I agree. Unique. The 18-50mm is an extremely interesting camera. Nice thinking, Nikon. Sounds like the perfect hiking and travel camera for those who like wide angle. Or a slick little star gazing camera. I'm still glad I got a 4/3rds with 18-36mm equiv lens, because then I can switch to a telephoto or bright prime. But the Nikon is compelling.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 21:14 UTC
Total: 122, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »