Christof21

For me this is the exact opposite !! Using the histogram, I don't need to bother with complex methods like zone metering. I look at the histogram. It is more accurate, faster, simpler.. Especially ...

Yes, this is exactly what I mean, at least this is my opinion. I would certainly use a Coc a bit smaller than 0.02mm (maybe 0.015) but it is almost independent of any variables. If tomorrow, the ...

Good analysis ! There is some wrong logic about this topic. I recommend to use the classic Coc used by dof calculator, maybe a bit smaller and that is fine in every case !! There are not many ...

Today, size/weight has LOT's of value. This is the reason number 1 for the success of mirrorless in my opinion. Everybody is different so I understand that people may prefer the X-H1 size/weight. ...

I disagree 100%, what a bad advice (imho) !!! It is a common belief unfortunately... Besides, people tend to think that it is only for marketing and people would be stupid enough to make their ...

See the prices of his lenses too..  The 300mm f4 is expensive and the 2 others are not cheap. You may say that you would need a 600mm FF, but with the high resolution FF sensors, you can use ...

Thanks for this usefull information a,d for taking the time to do it. It seems to confirm gains if you use other image aspect ratios, in which case you have gains at all focal length. Personnally, ...

Yes, I did not know about baffles... Unfortunately,  he does not show examples with other aspect ratios like 1:1 where the gain is the highest, with no vignetting problems (I mean the square is ...

Not easy to frame properly though...

That nobody mentionned, which is a bit surprising... You can take more advantage of the APS-C lenses if you are interested in other picture ratios, 16:9, 4:3, 1:1 than if you were using the APS-C body.

Thanks Chris, I appreciate, especially coming from you. I will remember this !

Kiwi2 is correct. I prefer to be ridiculous but remain an honest person and admit I was wrong.

You are correct Kiwi2

I was not targeting you of course, sorry if you understood it this way, never been my intention

So the site says don't do this but you do this ... You publicly and intentionnally post graphs which are inappropriate !!! Patrick is very used to this.. He does it all the time (and without ...

The Canon FF is a better camera for low light and this is the truth, the opposite of what we see in the graph. I have a really different view about him. Based on what he writes, it is obvious for ...

Maybe some people can be well informed here, don't you think so or should we hide the truth ?

One of the reason to buy FF is to have less noise. So this is important in the buying decision

In fact, the graph was a bad news for the X-T3. So to compensate, he included a graph with Canon... Though these graphs should not be used for this, especially between different brands. But the ...

Becasuse I want to be fair on my side: 2/3 stops translates to the distance between ISO100 =>ISO160, ( slightly less than 2/3 as written)