Christof21

Absolutely true. You improve DR also you can have a lower equivallent ISO.

This is extremely rare. The important part is the sensor, really. For instance, GFX is similar to his competitors though Fuji says it « highly customised» Well the truth is that it is highly ...

Agree with this. Conclusion: so far we do not know. Because it is the same sensor and the settings are different (which is suspicious) So if you prefer I say: could be due to.more exposure. We will ...

In this case, you should agree that the comparison is BS... The cleaner image is certainly due to more exposure. Has to be confirmed with dpr studio scene but imaging resource does not seem to be ...

Click on the exif data (see the label on top). At ISO51200 for instance,  the settings are: D500: f/11 1/4000 X-H1: f/8 1/4000 X-T2: f/8 1/5000

IBIS is made huge by Fuji so far. size/weight could be much smaller/lighter. The Sony A7III is not small but this is a FF and the space required for IBIS is proportional to sensor size. My guess is ...

There is ISO discrepancy even between X-H1 and X-T2 ! No miracles. Which is really strange because there is a difference at all ISO, so it seems that Fuji may have pushed the cursor even further. N ...

You have an easy choice.. Between x-H1 and sony A7III, Sony wins by far in my opinion. When you compare equivalent lenses, Sony is not really bigger and even less heavier... That said, it is good ...

I agree with you but I do not care if this is done this way. The arguments given for creating a new thread are a little bit odd because they say that the topic has already been discussed ad ...

It is not a new topic but the same topic. It is about PSAM, why having several threads ? It is a thread that started in 2014, so what ? I am more used to the opposite. It is better to look in ...

Are you sure you do not need IBIS and/or OIS for your type of photography ?

I don t understand the problem .. The topic can still be discussed. What bothers you, just curious

In fact, you could also ask the opposite question... THe equivalent Sony lens is lighter, same price if not cheaper. there are many examples where FF is better even for price/weigth. Between the ...

This is an old thread so what ? Difficult to understand your logic...

Just a max ISO option = no limit It was more a problem when the max ISO was limited to 6400. But the default behavior should be to NOT break the minimum ss before breaking the ISO rule I have been ...

Time to be on topic Vic ! You keep saying the same thing without takibg into account the replies to your posts. Read the op answer pls. His original post makes full sense to me

The 24-205 is very close in terms of size/weigth and is more versatile than the 16-55 f/2.8. As soon as APSC offers challenging lenses with wide aperture, FF offers a better equivalent lens.

Where did you read this ? This is not my understanding but if you have some information, please share. It uses sensors to detect movements. It will amplify the sensor movements relatively to the ...

Your logic is not correct. It does not work like this, the IBIS may not be as effective  but it is only due to the limitations for the sensor movements. Your calculations make no sense in fact. Bes ...

I agree of course ! I would add that nowadays the margin for IQ improvements are getting smaller and smaller... Sensors reach their limits for instance,  now having a sensor whose 0.3 stops ...