Christof21

Why those differences exist ? I haven't found some good technical reasons for this so for me I conclude that Fuji is cheating. The reasons are not technical, much more commercial... and this is ...

Preview + histogram is a much better method imho, I agree ! I always use average metering because this is more stable, so this is easier to set exposure with exposure compensation.

Just a remark.  I can  not tell about the dark noise but if you want to avoid this problem you can shoot multiple pictures and stack them in post processing.  I expect much better results in terms ...

Hi, Ok, so can we see how this is applied ? Recently this thread: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/58391720 It is interesting because the op says the typical fallacies about this topic. So my ...

Well, unfortunately you are right. Everybody needs it, more or less. And when you need it, it makes a big difference.. Well I am waiting for APS-C cameras with Ibis... Neither Fuji nor Sony have it ...

Hi, The real reason ?  Well, imho, Sony focuses on the FF market and it would be difficult to compete with them because they build also  the sensor for Fuji... They are alone on FF maybe for a long ...

Just stop down more with the bigger sensor. This has to do again with equivalence !

There are in fact more scenarios (deep dof and see below) Not 100% true With the XF-90mm, Ibis is certainly necessary for ss slower than 1/150s... The problems is that most of the people do not ...

Why ?  Is there a scientific reason for this ? Not as far as I know but I am just curious.

The main problem with Fuji is the lack of IBIS. And all primes lack stabilisation... Ok, primes are fast but sometimes you just don't want to use a big aperture. In some conditions (low light for ...

I complete because the results, provided they are true, are interesting. In my schema, when the diffraction effect is above the merklinger effect, it means that this is in perfect focus  = you ...

Is what you are saying objective or subjective ? I like the theory he describes, I am not a fan in practice. For me this is a waste to focus on the furthest plan, it is better to make a compromise. ...

Hi, After dof revisited: http://trenholm.org/hmmerk/DOFR.html Here is Merklinger revisited... To be understood, the merklinger method described in the good link by merklinger himself must be ...

Of course not ! :-) See my reply to Doug Pardee. It is simply impossible. Even with a high resolution sensor iyou would not resolve so small items.

Absolutely incorrect. How could you believe this ? The diffraction effect may be  much more important, which is explained in the article of Merklinger himself !: http://trenholm.org/hmmerk/DOFR.html ...

OK, I accept :-) Yes  underexposing 1 stop does not make a big difference. Having a SS twice slower is much more significant Lot's of good advice IMHO consider this is better to shoot with a high ...

Aperture priority

6400 is the max with x-e2... Is it clear now or will you still pretend that I misunderstood what people are saying ?

Unfortunately,  I say this from experience... If you don't pay attention, you may regret it and delete numerous pictures. It happened to me, at least at the beginning and even once recently (I had ...

What you propose is a workaround, but not as good (for me). Please understand.