kodacolor200

Yes the original x100 has the best iq imo. Never gonna happen but a 12mp sensor built on current apsc tech would make this well suited to low light shooting.  12mp is plenty for this cameras ...

I agree here. The main advantage of mirrorless I have seen is IBIS. There are situations where my EM5 mark ii  is best for low light simply due to the effectiveness of the IBIS. Fuji having apsc ...

Unless mirrorless can offer an actual advantage then it will not be taken up by pros readily. It’s catching up, but what is the actual benefit of the system especially when Size is not an advantage...

Until your Fuji becomes the new norm. I imagine when you first got your FF you where full of inspiration and shooting more also. What will get you taking better pictures is persistence and ...

For real? Not sure how the Fuji is a more “artistic” camera. Photography is 90% a technical exercise regardless of what camera you’re using. You cannot create a vision if you do not have the ...

Fuji grows it’s X series off the back of instax sales. X series cameras don’t generate that much revenue for the company. With the right glass they will. Have you Used one for any period of ...

You are looking at two different test scenes. There is no magic happening with regards to the 24mp sensor. Just more res. I shot an x pro 2 for a couple of weeks before I returned it as there was ...

Reporter: "Mr Gandhi, what do you think of Western Civilisation?" Mahatma Gandhi: "I think it would be a very good idea!" Sure. My point here is that a lot of pros still shoot D700s and for good ...

I’m not telling you to do anything. Again i will only point out that the D700 is 10 years old and people are winning prestigious rewards in 2018 with it. I would choose it’s output over any apsc. ...

It still does. I have made many mistakes, fortunately that was not one of them. Although you can easily fill that void of regret for well under $1000

Of all my cameras the D700 has most pleasing SOOC however this is not an issue as I only shoot RAW. I believe 12 mp 35mm has a certain look feel to the files, that  IMO it is due to having BIG ...

Everything I do is geared toward print, this is why I prefer FF. The difference is noticeable to me and I don’t even print that large. The edge quality of FF, the tones and colour are punchier; ...

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilm-x-pro1/25 you can drop a D700 into this comparison chart  click around the entire scene at any range between 200-6400; the D700 is superior; especially as ...

A d700 is far more consistent in IQ vs the XT1 - IMO apsc just doesn’t cope as well in challenging light from my experience. There is nothing particularly special about the IQ of the 24 xtrans vs ...

I think you will find that the D700 still outperforms all apsc sensors, current or not. The D700 still has better SNR than a D500, as well as better tonal range and colour sensitivity. Now I have ...

noise vs retained details. Especially if printing larger. High iso D700 shows better detail. D700 has better colour sensitivity and tonal range. The xpro has a very slight DR advantage at low iso, ...

I shoot both. I shoot an XT1, have tried the newer xpro, t2 but the iq is the same just more res. I find FF offers more pleasing IQ over a wider variety of shooting conditions, and delivers more ...

Hi Christian, Does the  shirft converter have a crop factor also? Just curious as this seems like a fairly accessible solution for many.

yes but it will be softer and vignetting is a non issue today. There is no advantage to putting a tilt shift on apsc. Crop will just ruin the characteristics that these lenese are designed to ...

Spectacular?.. Not sure about that. If you are buying a tilt shift lens that are a couple of grand, why would you waste it on an apsc sensor. It will be softer on apsc than FF. If you are going to ...