mg_k

Lives in Australia Australia
Has a website at http://bit.ly/1IwMMAn
Joined on May 1, 2011

Comments

Total: 153, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Pedro M C: Long go the time when photography was an art.

Bottom line - some people are just too afraid and reluctant to accept any changes.

Link | Posted on Mar 18, 2018 at 06:29 UTC
In reply to:

Pedro M C: Long go the time when photography was an art.

@DiffractionLtd and I think the point is who cares about what your so-called pro thinks? Who is a pro to question anyone really?

Link | Posted on Mar 18, 2018 at 05:50 UTC
In reply to:

Pedro M C: Long go the time when photography was an art.

Who cares what other people use?

Stop worrying others, use what you enjoy that does the job FOR YOU.

Unless you are a wannabe pro just because, according to you, pro uses Canikon?

Link | Posted on Mar 18, 2018 at 02:38 UTC
In reply to:

Jefftan: dual gain doesn't make sense
mean better use ISO 800 and not ISO 400?

sounds ridiculous

How about actually reading the article and explanation from Rishi?

Link | Posted on Mar 18, 2018 at 02:23 UTC
In reply to:

Pedro M C: Long go the time when photography was an art.

So it's subjective then.

You hold your camera for a long time and others don't.

Poor to you, great to others.

fyi I'm very relaxed.

Link | Posted on Mar 18, 2018 at 02:12 UTC
In reply to:

Pedro M C: Long go the time when photography was an art.

.

Link | Posted on Mar 18, 2018 at 02:12 UTC
In reply to:

Pedro M C: Long go the time when photography was an art.

Define poor.

For starters is the size of a camera part of ergonomics?

So is this camera too small FOR YOU and therefore it’s poor?

Btw don’t bother answering - it’s rhetorical.

Link | Posted on Mar 18, 2018 at 01:43 UTC
In reply to:

Pedro M C: Long go the time when photography was an art.

Ergonomics is SUBJECTIVE, yet the technical assessment as shown in this article is OBJECTIVE.

That says it all.

Link | Posted on Mar 18, 2018 at 00:05 UTC
In reply to:

Pedro M C: Long go the time when photography was an art.

In case you haven't realised it yet photography being an art and understanding the technicalities of your tool aren't mutually exclusive.

You just sound like another salty anti-Sony fanboy by moving the goal post.

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2018 at 23:44 UTC
In reply to:

Pedro M C: Long go the time when photography was an art.

This is a gear site for gear heads.

Maybe you're visiting wrong place?

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2018 at 23:31 UTC
On article Hands-on with the Sony a7 III (584 comments in total)
In reply to:

Daspletosaurus: Soo... are we yet at a point where Canon glass works better on a Sony body than native Canon? I'm trying to come up with a single compelling reason one would consider a 6D II and I'm coming up short. So yeah, the price of the adapter pushes your out of door price to be $550 higher, which isn't exactly chump change. But you get so much more... I'd argue that if you don't need the weather sealing, this is a better bet than the 5D IV.

All you need is a Sigma MC-11 adapter which costs $150, you get full AF capability on this Sony that far exceeds any Canon body except maybe the 1DXII.

Link | Posted on Mar 7, 2018 at 02:25 UTC
In reply to:

shoevarek: So is there anything substantial that new model provides for landscape/portrait photography over original A7/A7R?

Mainly better dynamic range for landscape, better AF and eye tracking for portrait.

Link | Posted on Mar 1, 2018 at 05:12 UTC
In reply to:

Alexis22: If they keep shipping with this kit lens then you lose all the image quality that the new features and sensor brings. I had the original A7 with this kit lens and it was a horrible lens. Outside the center the photos were very very very soft even at a decent aperture.

Get the upcoming Tamron 28-70 2.8 = problem solved ;)

Link | Posted on Feb 28, 2018 at 10:20 UTC
In reply to:

milkod2001: Sony could have easily sold this camera at $2500 but they decided to put even more pressure to only upcoming Nikon / Canon FF mirrorless. They will not only have to match the specs but also $2000 price. Nobody will pay more than $2000 for the similar specs no matter the brand.

@sjazz wait 6 months, Digidirect 10% + Sony VISA cashback + TRS = $2k AUD no worries :)

Link | Posted on Feb 28, 2018 at 10:17 UTC
In reply to:

milkod2001: Sony could have easily sold this camera at $2500 but they decided to put even more pressure to only upcoming Nikon / Canon FF mirrorless. They will not only have to match the specs but also $2000 price. Nobody will pay more than $2000 for the similar specs no matter the brand.

Not to mention it took Sony 4+ years to build up its native lens collection as it is now.
And now the major 3rd parties are jumping on the bandwagon.

Canikon? That have ZERO ff native mirrorless lens!

Link | Posted on Feb 28, 2018 at 10:12 UTC
In reply to:

M G L: Very nasty artifacts in sample images, stripes and blue/purple color blotches.

Sorry sony fanboys and paid supporters but this is far from

All camera which has OSPDAF on it exhibits similar "issue".

Link | Posted on Feb 28, 2018 at 10:03 UTC
In reply to:

ChickenBalls: I wonder how accurate and fast the AF will be when shooting with EF lenses

Faster than most Canon bodies except the 1D series.

The Sony body also provides you features that Canon body doesn't such as eye tracking, 93% EVF coverage and IBIS for all of your Canon primes.

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2018 at 21:41 UTC
In reply to:

Elaka Farmor: So how is the AF in video mode compared to Canons Dual Pixel-AF?

Comparable, no clear winner.

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2018 at 21:39 UTC
In reply to:

Onteo: I have a 5DIII and just 3 lens, Besides getting some extra DR and 4 extra FPS, 4K video and Ibis plus losing some ergonomics. How would the AF compare?

This has A9 AF which is comparable to 1DXII. So it's going to be a night and day difference.

Not to mention completely silent E shutter, eye tracking and many more benefits.

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2018 at 12:58 UTC
In reply to:

PredatorsPrey: Does it shoot 10fps with adapted lenses as well or is it crippled like the latest A7R to 3fps?

And what's the buffer depth for RAWs?

yes it supports 10fps with adapted lenses in both mechanical and e-shutter.

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2018 at 12:32 UTC
Total: 153, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »