Andrew Elliott

Lives in United Kingdom London, United Kingdom
Works as a Film/TV Post Production
Joined on Jan 11, 2010

Comments

Total: 35, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

jsimoespedro: Would you say it is the same size as a FF DSLR?

It's amazing looking at the GFX 50S alongside the Nikon D810 with its tiny sensor!

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2016 at 13:24 UTC

F2.4? What's that in Micro Four Thirds?

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2016 at 07:31 UTC as 15th comment | 7 replies

Another very nice production.

Were the focal lengths quoted on screen doubled for 35mm equivalence?

I’m surprised the lens model was not quoted with the info for each shot, too.
I imagine this is what a lot of DP readers are interested in, also.
Maybe in future productions, please?

all the best

Link | Posted on Apr 11, 2016 at 13:10 UTC as 102nd comment | 5 replies
On article Leica Q In-depth Review (1140 comments in total)

If only my Q had a CCD sensor...

Link | Posted on Mar 24, 2016 at 14:03 UTC as 103rd comment | 4 replies

If only Pentax would release lenses very very similar to these.

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2016 at 09:15 UTC as 52nd comment | 13 replies
In reply to:

Andrew Elliott: The Pentax K-01 designer has been poached by Leica!

I know, I know.

Link | Posted on Jan 20, 2016 at 23:26 UTC

The Pentax K-01 designer has been poached by Leica!

Link | Posted on Jan 20, 2016 at 20:35 UTC as 98th comment | 11 replies
On article A lot to Leica? Hands-on with the Leica SL (Typ 601) (1497 comments in total)

Come on Leica, it's not even April!

Link | Posted on Oct 21, 2015 at 16:33 UTC as 177th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

Andrew Elliott: Regarding compression, and the benefits of operational speed and file sizes, I think Sony have done a good job on the A7r2.

However, with a ‘simple firmware update’, I ‘d like to have the confidence-boosting choice to switch to uncompressed RAW, even at the expense of operational speed and large file sizes, for all my cityscapes at night and astro star trails, etc.

Thank you

@ Esstree, I agree with what you're saying too, though the compression, surely, is there mainly for speed... and smaller file sizes in the first place.

So the compression is a good thing good if the camera would otherwise be painfully slow, which it probably would be. Most results print very well and look superb at A3+, as far as I can see. That's not to say they couldn't be even better.

The A7r2 probably couldn't capture uncompressed RAW files without a noticeable drop in opertional speed. This wouldn't bother me too much, so I'd like to have the the option.

all the best

Link | Posted on Sep 3, 2015 at 11:50 UTC
In reply to:

Andrew Elliott: Regarding compression, and the benefits of operational speed and file sizes, I think Sony have done a good job on the A7r2.

However, with a ‘simple firmware update’, I ‘d like to have the confidence-boosting choice to switch to uncompressed RAW, even at the expense of operational speed and large file sizes, for all my cityscapes at night and astro star trails, etc.

Thank you

I agree with that too.

Link | Posted on Sep 3, 2015 at 11:32 UTC

Regarding compression, and the benefits of operational speed and file sizes, I think Sony have done a good job on the A7r2.

However, with a ‘simple firmware update’, I ‘d like to have the confidence-boosting choice to switch to uncompressed RAW, even at the expense of operational speed and large file sizes, for all my cityscapes at night and astro star trails, etc.

Thank you

Link | Posted on Sep 3, 2015 at 10:32 UTC as 146th comment | 4 replies

Well done Olympus.

Link | Posted on Aug 7, 2015 at 10:03 UTC as 59th comment

On Flickr, when I search for B&W images made with a Leica, about 8 times out of 10, I guess correctly the ones taken by the M Monochrom.

You really need to see the printed images from the M Monochrom to really understand how good its output is.

I recently bought a Canon Pro-1 printer, it has 5 monochrome inks. Then I bought some Canson Baryta Photographique paper, A3+ size, very nice paper.

On printing a converted Canon 5d Mk3 B&W image taken with a Sigma 35mm f1.4 lens… and then printing the ‘same’ image taken with the M Monochrom with a Summilux 35mm f1.4 lens (both at f8, ISO 100 on the Canon and ISO320 on the MM, Sekonic 758 metering the light, same look achieved in Lightroom), the MM just looks lot better. As one might expect if you know what is going on, technically.

Despite all the hype on the internet, I don’t see how the M Monochrom v1’s output could be visibly improved with the Monochrom V2, at least not at the lower ISOs, where I hang around.

all the best

Link | Posted on Jun 3, 2015 at 16:10 UTC as 41st comment | 2 replies

Due to near-endless years of long hours of and hard work, at the cost of many a relationship, etc., I was able to buy a Monochrom last December. The 5dMk3, EM1, K5, GR V, etc are all gathering dust in the cupboard as this fantastic camera proves its worth again and again with its magnificent output.

Each to their own, but for me, the Monochrome, foibles and all, is the best camera out there. I even love its quirks. I also like the name of this new one, the Elliott. Even that is spelt properly (other Elliotts will understand)!

Link | Posted on May 3, 2015 at 14:34 UTC as 16th comment | 23 replies

The A7s has better noise control, Canon has more detail than the A7s and the A7r more detail still - this is to be expected.

I have to say that, based on this test, up to ISO 25,600, yes the A7s is ahead re: noise, but there does not seem to be the great leap forward one might expect, given all the hype. After that the noise difference is more clear, but by then the pictures are pretty ropey anyway, even on the A7s.

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2014 at 12:00 UTC as 156th comment

I want one.

Link | Posted on May 13, 2014 at 12:32 UTC as 11th comment
In reply to:

Andrew Elliott: Hello there,

If f-stop is the ratio of the lens's focal length to the diameter of the entrance pupil, should an f0.95 lens not be a little shorter than it is wide? OK maybe add in the barrel width, etc so a little longer than it is wide.

How come this lens (and others the same shape, like the faster MFT lenses) all look twice as long as they are wide?

thanks for any helping my understanding...
Andy

Thanks for your answer!

Andy

Link | Posted on May 8, 2014 at 13:08 UTC

Hello there,

If f-stop is the ratio of the lens's focal length to the diameter of the entrance pupil, should an f0.95 lens not be a little shorter than it is wide? OK maybe add in the barrel width, etc so a little longer than it is wide.

How come this lens (and others the same shape, like the faster MFT lenses) all look twice as long as they are wide?

thanks for any helping my understanding...
Andy

Link | Posted on May 7, 2014 at 17:38 UTC as 9th comment | 2 replies

She deserves it.

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2014 at 07:59 UTC as 15th comment
Total: 35, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »