zonoskar

Jou have to learn to live with the rotating focus ring with that lens. I hated it on my 40D, so I sold both.

Good article and also what I've been thinking. MILCs only real advantage is it can be much faster because of lack of mirror to slap around. But so far only the Sony A9 has been able to go beyond ...

It's also something they do with the EOS-M5 and M6, so yeah, this is a possibility too. Specially with the "2 FF MILCs in testing" rumor. But I hope Canon doesn't take this road. I have not ...

I think, regardless if a FF EF-M mount is possible, Canon will not do it as it will result in marketing headaches: people will be able to run the current crop of EF-M lenses on a FF body. Canon ...

Yes, I know. Another Canon FF MILC mount post. But when one of the rumor sites announced that the FF MILC mount would be something spectacular, I thought of a design that would satisfy both EF as ...

Now you can actually say the picture was taken by a potato.

I'm still flabbergasted that Canon themselves don't make such an adapter.

I suppose the M5-II will have the same low-light focussing down to -2EV that the M50 has. I just hope that the EVF will not be in the center, and hopefully, a pop-up affair so they don't have to ...

You can add * no in-body IS

Do you have a link?

Panning is one way of getting a sensation of speed in the picture. Be sure to use a slow shutterspeed (1/50th or lower). But you can also zoom in/out when taking the picture (while the shutter is ...

@Dareshooter: Would have been the perfect rebuttal, were it not for the correct use of 'their'... Shame.

I think the problem would be that Canon would probably not give you an external charger with the camera anymore so it has to be bought separately for $50 (or more). But apart from that, I'm all ...

I don't notice any difference between focusing my 100mm f2.8 Macro (non-L) or 17-40L on my EOS-M and 5D bodies.

If you see the vigetting from the 22mm f2.0 on the APS-C sensor (around 3 EV), I would doubt that it can illuminate an FF sensor completely.

It's because that will net them the highest DXO mark score. That's what counts nowadays. I don't like it either.

The recording resolution doesn't have to be equal to the output resolution. You could record in 4K, then downsize to 1080p. That gives better results I guess.

He did say "I would also like more EF-M primes, but for now I'm happy with the adapted EF lenses." at the start of his excellent post. EF-M lenses make sense for focal lengths up to ca. 35mm. Here ...

Canon created EF-M lenses where they make sense (small, light, inexpensive) and let you use the EF line for all other lenses. How is that not complete. It's the most complete MILC system you'll ...

Unless the M5-II will have 4K, no crop and DPAF in 4K (if that's important to you). I'm waiting for an M6-II to come out and hopefully with a usable 4K implementation.