zonoskar

The info was appreciated by me. I guess I should have done better research in stead of simply following brand loyalty.

Thanks for replicating the use-case. I seem to remember I tried with eye detection enabled and disabled and it didn't make a lot of difference, but I will try again. What lens are you using?

I fail to see where the lens comes into play with something stationary. If it was moving quickly towards me, I could see the issue. But the center of the lens is sharp enough that the image ...

This is the way I normally shoot yes. But I bought the R6 for the better AF. If I'm going to use the single shot AF, I could have saved 1000 euro and got the R instead.

I was under the impression that if you use eye AF and set the subject to None (is stead of people/animals), the AF would track the initial subject in the AF box. But apparently this is not the ...

I bought the R6 over the R because I believed the AF of the R6 was much better. But it is almost unusable in AF servo mode with subject recognition, so I end up using spot AF without servo AF. I ...

You don't have to use 195 fps. You can set it to 100 fps and have 0.5 seconds worth of photo's.

Even SLR is weird, because what camera system uses multiple lenses anyways. Oh, wait. It was to distinguish between the new camera's and the old ones that had more lenses. Same as now. In 30 years...

After using this camera for a few weeks I noticed a strange behavior in the viewfinder. If I zoom my EF 17-40f4L lens all the way out, it appears that the image corners zoom some more after I ...

I guess if you disable the button, it won't do anything. Right? Or am I missing something here?

Is this one using the complete sensor, or does it only use the center like that overpriced Sony phone with a 1" sensor?

I had the same dilemma, except for the lenses. I went with the R6 because of the IBIS and AF. The money saved would have been nice, but after a few months, I will have forgotten the extra cost. I ...

One would think that if they already have reverse-engineered the EF mount, and EF glass has been proven to work really well on RF cameras (with the adapter), they could just offer lenses with RF ...

I ended up getting an R6 from a reputable store's outlet offering. Is was only a few 100 euro more than an R7 with focal reducer. Thanks for all the insights you offered, really helpful.

Ah, I almost forgot about the M6II. That is also a good candidate as I already have a EF-M speedbooster and EFM 22mm f2.0 and I don't plan on buying lenses anytime soon. It would be way cheaper to ...

I'm only a bit worried for the AF performance, how that performs. I do take photo's of my dog, which can be a quick moving target. Hit rate on my 5Dc is sketchy, so I would like the next camera to ...

You've got a point there. But these lenses work on their EF-m speedbooster adapter, so I assume (bad thing to do, I know) they should work. As for the new camera bodies, the adapter has upgradable ...

You might be better off with the R7 and this focal reducer: https://viltroxstore.com/collections/speed-booster/products/viltrox-ef-r3-canon-ef-to-rf-mount-071x-focal-reducer I don't know the ...

I see that Viltrox makes a speedbooster adapter for EF-RF glass. It's supposed to be for cinema bodies, but I guess it will also fit the R7. ...

Looking to replace my ageing EOS 5Dc (it often needs some nudges to turn on, I'm expecting it to die soon), but I cannot justify spending more than $1000 on a body. This is a hobby for me, but not ...