OremLK

When you talk about a 600mm prime lens you're talking about something extremely specialized that only a tiny fraction of photographers even have any interest in. Fine, Mr. Elite Wildlife...

@Pixel Pooper: I would. Landscape photography often involves long, difficult hikes. Any amount of size and weight you can save is beneficial. And since shooting off a tripod with long shutter...

@certo666: You may already be aware of this, but they do have a couple of wide angle f/1.4 options (16mm and 23mm) as well as the 56mm f/1.2.

It wasn't the lack of fast glass/light gathering ability that drove me off Micro Four Thirds, it was the lower dynamic range and resolution. There are advantages to having a bigger sensor beyond...

I could not agree with this more. I don't see the point in having smaller mirrorless bodies like the A7 series and the new Canon and Nikon mirrorless systems if the lenses are bigger and heavier...

@blackcofee17 Just FYI, if it is indeed 5.7k or 6k, well, that's 17 megapixels or 20 megapixels, respectively. Don't know whether that's enough for your purposes when extracting stills, but both...

Fair enough! You seem to know what you need as a working professional and if you believe the G100 will meet those needs I won't second-guess that. Definitely not a product for me but clearly...

@zakk9: Given your specific requirements, and that you don't seem to mind the size of your GX8 bodies that much, I would consider selling my gear and switching to a Fuji X-T4. That's the only crop...

@zakk9: The point is there are much better options, some of which cost less money, than this camera, if you're looking to upgrade from the GM5--even within the Micro Four Thirds system. Better...

@PAntunes Sure, but that's always been the special strong suit of the A7S series. People buy these cameras *because* they're amazing for low light video.

@blackcoffee17: Would you rather have 8k but have much smaller pixel size on the sensor, resulting on decreased low-light performance, and all the other tradeoffs that brings? Or would you rather...

Take multiple frames, use AI to extract more detail/better noise performance without paying a penalty in motion blur. This technology already exists and keeps getting better over time.

5.7k / 6k is sufficient for this category of camera in my opinion. Most people still can't even process 8k, and most of the ones who can aren't looking at a $3,000 camera, but rather for something...

Totally, completely different class of camera. The GM1/GM5 were not "slightly" smaller. It's the all-important difference between pocketable and not-pocketable. There are a ton of MFT and APS-C...

Hilariously incorrect. 35mm film is closer in resolving power to what you'd get out of a modern smartphone than to a 24-megapixel APS-C camera, let alone the highest-resolution full frame cameras,...

I'll be interested to see what the iPhone does with a larger sensor in the upcoming model. They seem to have better computational photography than anyone else except for Google, but their sensors...

You could easily make an 8x10 print out of a lot of these and most people wouldn't tell the difference. Some of them do fall apart a bit when viewed above smartphone size. With computational...

They make several different grips, ranging from small ones suitable for a small prime lens, to large beefy ones for use with a long telephoto lens. It's meant to support a modular setup. More...

This camera is doing a lot of things a lot better than people have been giving it credit for. How cool is it to have a tiny full frame street photography camera, similar in size to the Sony RX1...

@kty That's why I said "if you want a longer shutter speed to intentionally induce motion bur". I don't see how a fully articulating screen saves battery life versus a tilting screen. Also,...