OremLK

Is it just me--and I say this as someone who couldn't care less about brand loyalty or brand fights--or do the colors on these sample images look pretty... bad...? After a week of staring at R5 &...

For a professional shoot, throw on an external recorder. Relatively small expense compared to the cost of the camera. Unfortunate that you have to do that, but it's still a pretty great deal...

Well, but appearances must be maintained. You do a professional shoot on a smartphone, clients might (erroneously) start thinking "Why am I paying someone, I could just do this myself on my own...

More likely, it's because website photos, social media, etc, do not require the image quality an ILC provides, being that they'll rarely be viewed above 1080p and virtually never above 4k. So it's...

For making large prints or for being able to make huge crops. Hot take: If you aren't interested in either of those things (and you don't mind the ergonomics), then yeah, you might as well be...

Sure. Get out the stilettos and leather!

@Barty L: Because it's a ridiculous analogy that doesn't even make sense! You could've said "walk around in shoes a size too small" or something sensible, but for whatever reason "whipped...

Why do people insist on using such ridiculous hyperbole/strawman arguments? Taking a photo on a smartphone is the equivalent to being roped to a frame and whipped?? Good god...

I prefer tilting screens to fully articulating ones. I like to shoot fast and it just takes so much longer to adjust a fully articulating screen by comparison.

Love the design language on the Nikon Z series, especially this one and the Z50 (for some reason). I know you don't buy a camera for the looks, but it sure does get me more excited to shoot when I...

To those saying the A7 III is a substantially better camera, what specs sheets (which is all we have to go on for this camera) are YOU looking at? On the ones I'm seeing, almost all of the specs...

Curious how good the 24-50 kit lens will be. Looks at first glance like it might be the smallest zoom lens out there for full frame. If the optical quality can support the full 24 megapixels,...

When you talk about a 600mm prime lens you're talking about something extremely specialized that only a tiny fraction of photographers even have any interest in. Fine, Mr. Elite Wildlife...

@Pixel Pooper: I would. Landscape photography often involves long, difficult hikes. Any amount of size and weight you can save is beneficial. And since shooting off a tripod with long shutter...

@certo666: You may already be aware of this, but they do have a couple of wide angle f/1.4 options (16mm and 23mm) as well as the 56mm f/1.2.

It wasn't the lack of fast glass/light gathering ability that drove me off Micro Four Thirds, it was the lower dynamic range and resolution. There are advantages to having a bigger sensor beyond...

I could not agree with this more. I don't see the point in having smaller mirrorless bodies like the A7 series and the new Canon and Nikon mirrorless systems if the lenses are bigger and heavier...

@blackcofee17 Just FYI, if it is indeed 5.7k or 6k, well, that's 17 megapixels or 20 megapixels, respectively. Don't know whether that's enough for your purposes when extracting stills, but both...

Fair enough! You seem to know what you need as a working professional and if you believe the G100 will meet those needs I won't second-guess that. Definitely not a product for me but clearly...

@zakk9: Given your specific requirements, and that you don't seem to mind the size of your GX8 bodies that much, I would consider selling my gear and switching to a Fuji X-T4. That's the only crop...