rsf3127

Best RAW converter on the market IMO. Best noise management by far. Local adjustments are a breeze in this new iteration.

That is a good advice. I have done exactly this for years.

Why do we need an "Authority" to tell us if the pictures are good or not? Can't we just judge by ourselves?

C'est sûre d'etre pas petit. Allors, pas de raison d'être. Tout ça a cause de la connerie du bokeh.

Well, I would gladly trade the extra 2 mm for 800 USD. And take a couple of steps back to include all I want in the picture whenever possible. This is why the difference is not relevant for me....

12 vs 14 mm is absolutely irrelevant.

I do not know. But for me every green foliage looks like water painting in every picture in this gallery. Look at the pine trees in th 7th for instance.

1999 USD. This is why I did not go to Fuji when I left Sony.
Olympus has an astounding lens for the same usage for 1199 USD, weathersealed.

I use a Tamron 180mm 2.8f for that. Ultrasharp. But a monster of a lens.

Why?

An alpha female that is powerful beyond measure seems very intimidating. A dominatrix photographer that arrives at your wedding with a camera and a whip. Ugh...

Or use the top of the carton box of the film canister and put it on the holder behind the camera.

My XD-5 has an ISO dial on it. Makes this gadget useless.

That title to the Quattro.

She ain't exactly pretty
Ain't exactly small
But you could say she's got it all

I agree it is a statement. Just not one that I am willing to make.

Designed by Zenit. Priced by Leica.

Even my ancient A5100 had an articulating screen. And was smaller.

No VF. No articulated screen. No buy.

Every M4/3 camera made in the last 5 years can take better pictures than this in the link below, technically speaking. The lens is indeed not outstanding in the outer third. What makes it great ...