Reilly Diefenbach

Reilly Diefenbach

Lives in United States Washington State, United States
Joined on Jul 18, 2010

Comments

Total: 606, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Reilly Diefenbach: You knew the film squirrels would have to be here playing with their nuts.

Cue the squirrel in chief. What a surprise!

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2017 at 00:34 UTC

You knew the film squirrels would have to be here playing with their nuts.

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2017 at 00:07 UTC as 58th comment | 6 replies

No thanks.

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2017 at 13:58 UTC as 5th comment
On photo Matterhorn at Sunrise in the Best Photo of the Week challenge (9 comments in total)

I would have gotten the reflection all in (two shots) and cloned out the contrail, but nice one anyway :^)

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2017 at 13:44 UTC as 6th comment
On photo DSC06920-2 in David John Cooper's photo gallery (2 comments in total)

I would have gotten the reflection all in, but nice one anyway :^)

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2017 at 00:22 UTC as 2nd comment
In reply to:

Scottelly: Someone should be fired for that name. A name like that makes me wonder how creative the programmers can possibly be. I think I'll stay away from this crapware until they can come up with a decent name for it. At least then they'll give me a little reassurance that their software might be good too. Did they also use a .cc domain name or something stupid like that?

Well, at least they didn't choose Alien Skin :^)

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2017 at 15:43 UTC

Skylum? Really??

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2017 at 14:40 UTC as 10th comment

Another great camera from Sony. Congrats!

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2017 at 19:14 UTC as 68th comment

Davinator will love this.

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2017 at 00:35 UTC as 22nd comment
On article First samples: Leica Thambar-M 90mm F2.2 (223 comments in total)

Is this for real? LOL!

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2017 at 00:33 UTC as 85th comment
On article Hands-on with Zeiss Milvus 25mm F1.4 (119 comments in total)

The steady stream of giant f1.4 two pound hunks of glass continues unabated. How many one eye in focus portraits are going to be taken with a 25mm lens?

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2017 at 16:53 UTC as 16th comment | 7 replies

Seems a high price to pay for .4db lower s/n and equal DR and Color depth.

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2017 at 18:29 UTC as 71st comment
On article What you need to know about Sony's a7R III (622 comments in total)
In reply to:

mbot: Still no 10bit 4:2:2 video!😩Damn.

A Panasonic GH5 offers far better video specs, and at a cheaper price. Sony should be ashamed of itself, 8bit 4:2:0 video is totally amateur, and atrocious by today's standards, especially at this price.

The a7R III won't be getting my money😜

4K video "atrocious." Got it.

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2017 at 13:58 UTC
On article Sony developing a 400mm F2.8 G Master lens (132 comments in total)

I sure wouldn't want a herkin 400 f 2.8 with a teeny little body on it. That would be very fatiguing.

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2017 at 18:31 UTC as 12th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

kobakokh: i think its a more important news then new cameras creating, because of millions of customers using this tools for process own photos, and also its a real full cost free. Who said the free apps can't be top professional quality?

Font won't scale to 4K so DXO has some actual work to do.

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2017 at 14:53 UTC

Hopefully they will bring it into the 4K era and scale the fonts.

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2017 at 13:26 UTC as 118th comment

Gentlemen, it may seem as though I care what software you use or how you feel about the discontinuation of LR standalone. I really don't. The only trolling going on around here is the torrent of foulmouthed adolescent fury aimed at Adobe. You're all going to use your existing versions until they rot or get with the Adobe program or use some other software, all of which will fall short of CC in one aspect or another. Your loss entirely. Adobe's decision has been made and their stock is up $25 since the announcement. Does that fact increase your ire? Do I make you angry? Can't afford ten bucks a month for a hobby or profession you claim to enjoy/rely on?
Sorry, not sorry! (T Blair)

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2017 at 01:11 UTC as 27th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

Gerard D C: Adobe marketing fluff and fobbing-off are legendary. No surprise that they think customers will accept any old promise or gimmick.

Just been reading posts on the Adobe forum about problems with their new Dimension CC application for placing 3D elements into photos. It won't open on many computers!

Dimension CC is an amateur 3D toy compared to the top apps in the industry, but according to the Adobe product manager on the forum, it doesn't work for many people because it uses the "latest technology". She said she knows "it sucks" if you have a machine a few years old.

The most arrogant part is the claim that it is built on better technology than industry 3D content applications like, Maya, Houdini, Clarisse, ZBrush, Nuke and many others that work perfectly on the same computers. Those tools provide special effects and rendering solutions that are truly cutting edge.

The Adobe alternate universe where mediocrity is saluted as cutting edge is indeed a strange place.

I doubt if anyone here cares about high end 3D rendering software. The topic is Lightroom, which is about as far from mediocre as it is possible to be in the (small) Photographic software world.

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2017 at 20:22 UTC

The rage seems to have ratcheted down a bit since yesterday, but the hysteria continues...

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2017 at 14:46 UTC as 58th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

ahrensjt: Here's why this is just dishonest: if Adobe really wanted to keep "Classic" around, they would just have added a cloud-storage OPTION to Lightroom. NOT a separate product. Users would just have to understand that they don't get the same desktop/mobile integration for photos stored locally. Heck, we should be able to have some locally, and some in their cloud.

By having two products it's obvious that "Classic" will killed and Lightroom users will have to go to their cloud storage.

Nothing of the sort is obvious.

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2017 at 14:43 UTC
Total: 606, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »