Reilly Diefenbach

Reilly Diefenbach

Lives in United States Washington State, United States
Joined on Jul 18, 2010

Comments

Total: 635, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Not a good vid.

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2018 at 01:47 UTC as 6th comment
On photo Colosseum, Rome in the Your City - Old Architecture (pre WW2) challenge (4 comments in total)

Might want to straighten it up a bit.

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2018 at 22:01 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply

The Sony version will be right along :^)

Link | Posted on Jan 9, 2018 at 22:41 UTC as 35th comment | 3 replies

Every anti PETA post in this comment section will increase my donation by ten dollars.

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2018 at 19:16 UTC as 28th comment | 4 replies

But can it do 3D pop?

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2018 at 22:44 UTC as 45th comment | 3 replies
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 Review (920 comments in total)
In reply to:

aris14: Let's make a top specs sports magazine, i.e A4 and A3 page size and double spread respectively, 135 gsm triple coated satin finish paper, best FM screen rasterized and finally transferred and printed in a top of the tops press machine.
Suppose that we have the same image shot with flagship cameras in 4/3, M43, APS-C and FF cams, which had the proper basic PP treatment.
How many of DPR members could spot and identify any difference..?

This one for sure.

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2018 at 22:42 UTC

As the planet drowns in sweating meat.

Link | Posted on Dec 12, 2017 at 04:59 UTC as 56th comment
In reply to:

J A C S: A mirrorless fan kicking a dSLR shooter. Happens everyday here.

A typical Open Forum denizen is heard from.

Link | Posted on Dec 12, 2017 at 04:40 UTC

Got to have 4 or 5K once you've seen it :^)

Link | Posted on Dec 4, 2017 at 21:52 UTC as 35th comment | 2 replies

This is how we do a pano, folks. Beautiful shot! The ridgeline looks a bit discontinuous and would have benefited from a higher MP camera, but low noise throughout is very nice.

Link | Posted on Dec 4, 2017 at 15:44 UTC as 13th comment
On article Why Capture One can't replace Adobe Lightroom (68 comments in total)

Version 11 now has excellent highlight and shadow control, similar to LR/ACR. Soundly trounces CNX-D and DXO photolab for nefs with very wide dynamic range. Would I pay $300 for it? No.

Link | Posted on Dec 2, 2017 at 19:43 UTC as 13th comment
On article Why Capture One can't replace Adobe Lightroom (68 comments in total)
In reply to:

Reilly Diefenbach: Capture One 11 can't replace CC or DXO photolab or even CNX-D for my D850 because it can't do fine detail as well.

Dave, if you would keep the hell away from me and stop your stalking, that would make the world a better place.

Link | Posted on Dec 2, 2017 at 19:31 UTC
On article Why Capture One can't replace Adobe Lightroom (68 comments in total)
In reply to:

Reilly Diefenbach: Capture One 11 can't replace CC or DXO photolab or even CNX-D for my D850 because it can't do fine detail as well.

I can only go by what you yourself have put up as your best work, Gary.

Link | Posted on Dec 2, 2017 at 01:55 UTC
On article Why Capture One can't replace Adobe Lightroom (68 comments in total)
In reply to:

Reilly Diefenbach: Capture One 11 can't replace CC or DXO photolab or even CNX-D for my D850 because it can't do fine detail as well.

I use whatever software works best, Gary. The snapshots you take don't require the highest quality anyway.

Link | Posted on Dec 2, 2017 at 01:27 UTC
On article Why Capture One can't replace Adobe Lightroom (68 comments in total)

Capture One 11 can't replace CC or DXO photolab or even CNX-D for my D850 because it can't do fine detail as well.

Link | Posted on Dec 1, 2017 at 23:28 UTC as 21st comment | 20 replies
In reply to:

fPrime: It's easier to buy a better camera to get colors/tones right at capture.

Any idea what kind of sensor the better camera should have, f?

Link | Posted on Dec 1, 2017 at 17:49 UTC
In reply to:

Reilly Diefenbach: The problem I have with C1 is that I can do everything they're just getting around to for $10 a month instead of $20. But I would still have to buy Photoshop for the things DXO and C1 can't do. C1 is a good program, I'm sure, within its limitations, but the price is a bit of a killer. I'll be downloading the trial to see if they've caught up to or even surpassed Develop Process 4 for control of highlights and shadows.

I know exactly the mushy look to which you refer, Matthew, but to go over the top and claim that we're all pounding our h/s into jelly is just wrong. A light hand on the sliders is usually a good idea whatever the vendor. My experience with C1 version 10 is that the dreaded plasticity sets in a touch earlier than with LR. As to C1 ver 11, we shall see.

Link | Posted on Dec 1, 2017 at 02:10 UTC

Let's increase the military budget immediately to counter this horrific threat!

Link | Posted on Nov 30, 2017 at 20:07 UTC as 69th comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

Reilly Diefenbach: The blurry nose and ears people will love this thing.

Davinator, the village idiot.

Link | Posted on Nov 30, 2017 at 17:11 UTC
In reply to:

Rick Knepper: I guess in another 10 years, we'll see the third lens in this family. or maybe they'll just start over with a new generation. If these lenses (M in general) have such high resolution, they deserve to be backed by a high resolution sensor.

Don't hold your breath :^)

Link | Posted on Nov 30, 2017 at 17:09 UTC
Total: 635, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »