Lives in Saskatoon
Works as a Freelance Developer
Joined on Nov 23, 2010


Total: 199, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

kriztian: Real photographers are praising the Lumia 1020. Apple doesn´t even come close. Thats a fact. Cheers :)

I got stung with a Windows Smart-phone once. Never again.

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2013 at 16:10 UTC
On article 6 things iPhone photographers want from Apple (66 comments in total)

Anytime i read about more megapixels I get a nosebleed.
Seems I just manage to absorb the idea that more is not better and then...the cold war on this issue heats up for smart phones.

Take a fully charged smart phone camera indoors...say a kid's birthday for example. Shoot 25-flash, 25- no flash pictures, doesn't matter and see how many a blury and how much battery life is left. Build a rating system on these numbers and maybe i will have a chance of understanding which camera is better....

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2013 at 01:08 UTC as 13th comment

That sounds vaguely condescending. I hope they sell dozens of these.

Link | Posted on Sep 5, 2013 at 05:38 UTC as 44th comment

Great images though everything like this seems to be an homage to Ansel Adams. Any time I tinker with B&W I feel like I am just riding along on his shoulders.

Link | Posted on Sep 2, 2013 at 14:07 UTC as 19th comment

I can think of a dozen reasons why this is ill advised.

No ... it's even worse than that. Get a proper housing or buy a dedicated water camera.

Link | Posted on Sep 2, 2013 at 14:04 UTC as 38th comment

Wow. That is really depressing.

Link | Posted on Sep 2, 2013 at 01:20 UTC as 25th comment
On article Sony A3000 First Impressions Review (621 comments in total)
In reply to:

David zzzzzzzzzz: Buyer beware, this model will be replaced by another in 12 months. Sony has a way of making something "new" obsolete in no time at all.

That only matters if you succumb to peer pressure or have a OCD condition that forces you to make needless upgrade purchases.

Link | Posted on Aug 29, 2013 at 00:01 UTC

$400...with a lens. Amazing. I can't wait for the deep review.

Link | Posted on Aug 27, 2013 at 14:53 UTC as 34th comment | 4 replies
On article Prepare yourself for the 41-megapixel watch (60 comments in total)

I still don't get how they settle on such high MP counts for little devices. I am still waiting for a watch that is cooler than the old Timex data watch. Yeah, that one where you held it up to your computer screen to sync it.

Link | Posted on Aug 15, 2013 at 12:48 UTC as 27th comment
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Real-world Samples (148 comments in total)
In reply to:

Absolutic: these honestly look very poor. Looks like noise reduction is eating the details like there is no tomorrow on these, I assume all Jpegs. I will reserve my judgement til I see Raw files, but Panasonic once again proves that its jpeg engine truly sucks. Just check out Olympus OMD or Fuji XE1 jpegs for a change

I agree with Hamilton as well. That 12,800 shot is very impressive.

For me the test of a good system is what happens when you go indoors and this unit gets it done really well.

Link | Posted on Aug 14, 2013 at 21:32 UTC
On article Promotional fiasco injures 20 at LG event (35 comments in total)

LOL...natural selection at work eh?

Link | Posted on Aug 14, 2013 at 21:27 UTC as 31st comment | 1 reply
On article Play it again: NFL fans get 360-degree instant replay (11 comments in total)
In reply to:

InTheMist: Not photography related exactly, but NFL fans like me rejoice!

There is, no more important photography issue than football.

Link | Posted on Aug 5, 2013 at 05:59 UTC
On article Camera shipments continue to fall (133 comments in total)

I think the non-enthusiast market is sticking completely with their smart phones. They are willing to mash and smash away with whatever their Samsung/iPhone gives them and spank it up on Facebook.

At our last family reunion, out of 50 people, I was the only one using a DSLR and only one other person was shooting with a P&S. Everyone else...smart phone.

With few exceptions, their photography is breathtakingly bad - and none of them really care. The moment was captured...guddenough....

Makes me sad really.

Link | Posted on Aug 2, 2013 at 03:53 UTC as 42nd comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

DaytonR: Is it me or are these Panasonic GX cameras getting uglier with each incarnation ..... :)

I think it looks great.

Link | Posted on Aug 2, 2013 at 03:01 UTC
In reply to:

gftphoto: I think I may have finally found my travel camera!

I have to say I was thinking the same thing. Was saving up for the X100s but this warrants a close look. Really looking forward to more reviews.

Link | Posted on Aug 2, 2013 at 03:00 UTC
On article Fujifilm X100S Review (493 comments in total)
In reply to:

David Hardaway: I just reviewed the sample images that Barney took with the original x100. Night and day difference. The x100 images are very good and with good color and detail. X100s is clearly not an award winning camera so why is the dpreview gold being awarded to a jpg snapshot camera that is grossly overpriced?

Ease off the throttle Davey-boy. Take a card to your favorite camera shop, shoot a bit at the counter and then take it home and play with the images. I was not optimistic either until i did this.

The camera is really beautiful, the AF changes fixed all the things I hated about the X100 and it take a great photo. Saving up for one as I write this.

Link | Posted on Jul 31, 2013 at 03:29 UTC
On article Fujifilm X100S Review (493 comments in total)

LOL. Nice apology.

Link | Posted on Jul 30, 2013 at 01:11 UTC as 173rd comment
Total: 199, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »