mike earussi

There's no mention of it being OLED which is the only upgrade I want.

The lens test was all AF, the flowers all MF.

My understanding is that the 9890 has the same type of problematic head as the ill fated x900 series printers, and so once the head goes it's final. Having been through this with my 9900 I suggest ...

Actually I have used the dock to adjust the focus but I can check it again if you all think it's off. Its that just compared to my previous experience with other Sigma 50mm lenses this looks ...

The tests do show it noticeably weaker at f1.4 than stopped down: https://www.lenstip.com/400.4-Lens_review-Sigma_A_50_mm_f_1.4_DG_HSM_Image_resolution.html Also I've long sense given up expecting ...

The MFT cameras have done so since their inception because their normal full sensor size is an odd 1:1.33 ratio that doesn't really fit neatly into any paper size.

all at f1.4 processed at straight x3f 1 2 3 4 5 6

I got a very nice price on a demo lens from Adorama.  Shot this test yesterday. It runs from f1.4-f8 http://www.pbase.com/mikeearussi/sigma_50mm_f14_a Feel free to download and play with the ...

I think micro 4/3s cameras can do that like Panasonic and Olympus.

The easiest is Gatorboard with an adhesive coat. Foam board is cheaper but also has a tendency to warp, even the 1/2" thick.

Then you're stuck, unless you want to mount them without either a mat or frame, which is becoming more popular.

Being tied or feeling constricted by a specific aspect ratio only occurs if you're also tied to off the shelf mats and frames. If you make them yourself there's no problem.

Uncoated paper will create dot spread which is why the more ink you put down the muddier it will look. Laser printers don't use wet ink hence no dot spread on uncoated paper. For high definition ...

I switched to Prat and they're much more professional looking, but also a lot more expensive (and the pages are clear): http://www.prat-usa.com/modebook-149-spiral-book.html

I have the Logan 650-1 and it won't. 4 ply is max.

The actual inside cutout of the mats are smaller than the stated size and indicates the recommended size of the prints not the opening of the mat itself.

The SD1(M) was the first body that allowed you to manually adjust the AF offset. I don't even know whether the SDQs can do that.

I just profiled my laptop running Win 10 with no problem so it obviously works with Win 10. Do you have the original cd? If you do then you could try using that first and then updating if necessary.

SOP for the SD9-15. The AF virtually never works correctly without first sending it to Sigma (along with ALL your lenses for that body). But once you do it it works. My point is that if the AF does ...

When I was shooting IR with my SD14 and the 850nm the AF worked as well as it did in regular daylight shooting.