Robert Garcia NYC

Joined on Jul 25, 2010

Comments

Total: 193, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Sigma sd Quattro H real world samples gallery (108 comments in total)

Nice, I think Fuji should go dng too.

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2017 at 11:50 UTC as 34th comment
On article Fujifilm X100F Review (749 comments in total)
In reply to:

Robert Garcia NYC: Im happy with my X100F but i still wished they would have given us a regular bayer version with Fuji color like the original.

pepeta, no I do have it. I don't have to make things up to make a point. Yes I'd rather have a bayer 100% over the Xtrans. Xtrans II cam's were terrible to me but I do like this one a little bit better but would prefer a regular bayer like the original x100. Here is a random photo I took for you to see. We can meet up in person and I can show it you too in NYC. We can argue in person too. https://www.dpreview.com/galleries/2427869311/photos/3606324/_dsf0184b

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2017 at 00:03 UTC
On article Fujifilm X100F Review (749 comments in total)

Im happy with my X100F but i still wished they would have given us a regular bayer version with Fuji color like the original.

Link | Posted on Mar 16, 2017 at 20:10 UTC as 132nd comment | 3 replies
On article Juggling with one hand: Leica M10 shooting experience (495 comments in total)

Great!

Link | Posted on Mar 14, 2017 at 10:54 UTC as 152nd comment
On article Fujifilm X-T20 sample gallery (127 comments in total)
In reply to:

jorgepr: A beautiful set of sample images.
Congratulations to DPREVIEW. And FUJI for allowing us to acquire a camera with excellent image quality with beautiful colors, good compromise high ISO, 4K video, beautiful design, great xtrans sensor, very good focusing system, etc., etc. All this at a very affordable price.
Do not forget the set of lenses of excellent quality for this system

Thank you.

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2017 at 12:31 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-T20 sample gallery (127 comments in total)
In reply to:

jorgepr: A beautiful set of sample images.
Congratulations to DPREVIEW. And FUJI for allowing us to acquire a camera with excellent image quality with beautiful colors, good compromise high ISO, 4K video, beautiful design, great xtrans sensor, very good focusing system, etc., etc. All this at a very affordable price.
Do not forget the set of lenses of excellent quality for this system

i did.

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2017 at 02:12 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-T20 sample gallery (127 comments in total)
In reply to:

jorgepr: A beautiful set of sample images.
Congratulations to DPREVIEW. And FUJI for allowing us to acquire a camera with excellent image quality with beautiful colors, good compromise high ISO, 4K video, beautiful design, great xtrans sensor, very good focusing system, etc., etc. All this at a very affordable price.
Do not forget the set of lenses of excellent quality for this system

i love the Fuji bodies and color but detail is just ok.

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2017 at 01:43 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-T20 sample gallery (127 comments in total)
In reply to:

rfsIII: Correct me if I'm wrong, but while the photos are beautiful and the lenses seem magical, every shot I've enlarged seems to suffer from motion blur or just plain blur excepting the very handsome studio portraits...those are razor sharp.
Do I need new spectacles? Or what?

fuji sharp.

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2017 at 01:42 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-T20 sample gallery (127 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sezano: So. Is the output same as X-T2?

yes

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2017 at 01:42 UTC

I hope they move on to Japanese size cameras at some point.

Link | Posted on Feb 25, 2017 at 12:39 UTC as 83rd comment
On article CP+ 2017: Hands-on with Sigma's newest lenses (199 comments in total)

Sigma is killing it.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2017 at 14:06 UTC as 65th comment
On article Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR sample gallery (284 comments in total)
In reply to:

Blue Swan Media: To all those complaining about softness up close and wide open - just buy the f/1.4. Cracking sharp.

LOL

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2017 at 17:28 UTC
On article Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR sample gallery (284 comments in total)
In reply to:

Blue Swan Media: To all those complaining about softness up close and wide open - just buy the f/1.4. Cracking sharp.

There like glow at 1.4 like halation and not sharp. I had to stop down lots of times. But i heard of some folks with good copies too. Then again I had a great 35mm f2 and there have been people who didn't get a good copy of that lens.

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2017 at 04:24 UTC
On article Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR sample gallery (284 comments in total)
In reply to:

Blue Swan Media: To all those complaining about softness up close and wide open - just buy the f/1.4. Cracking sharp.

My 1.4 was glowie and had to stop down. As mentioned in a few reviews

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2017 at 22:48 UTC
On article Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR sample gallery (284 comments in total)
In reply to:

Contra Mundum: People are too obsessed with counting pixels. Resolution is a good thing of itself, but it's rarely what separates good picture from bad. Enjoying Fuji is actually very easy: shoot in jpeg and don't pixel peep. If you do that, the lens will look fine even at f/2. The price will go down in time.

I think one big thing is about sharpness on the focus point and clarity as someone mentioned before.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2017 at 22:47 UTC
On article Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR sample gallery (284 comments in total)
In reply to:

Edgar_in_Indy: Great photography, but that F2 performance is disappointing. Not at all what I expect from a modern prime lens. Are you sure the copy isn't a dud?

lol, ghost, no I might just use the f2 and deal with the soft shot.

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2017 at 17:58 UTC
On article Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR sample gallery (284 comments in total)
In reply to:

miles green: Lovely rendering, lots of "3D-pop", vibrant colors, beautiful sun-star and very good against the light, at least the first 2 pictures with the sun in the frame. But the baby portraits lack clarity, not sure why, because other close-up shots are sharp, like the motorcycle fork. Could it be movement (baby or Rishi) despite the 1/125 shutter speed? Are they misfocused? She's a beautiful baby girl, congrats Rishi! :)
Picture #5 has some strange artifacts in the mother's hair, excessive noise, faded blacks and some banding. I guess it's a few stops recovery from underexposure?

The close ups of the adorable baby I couldn't find what was in focus really so that will kill off some dimension to me. No acuity on a focus point. It is what is though.

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2017 at 10:18 UTC
On article Hands-on with the Canon EOS 77D (449 comments in total)

Not excited.

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2017 at 02:36 UTC as 24th comment
On article Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR sample gallery (284 comments in total)
In reply to:

Edgar_in_Indy: Great photography, but that F2 performance is disappointing. Not at all what I expect from a modern prime lens. Are you sure the copy isn't a dud?

Well it is what is. It's not sharp at f2 but will speed things up shooting wise at that stop.

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2017 at 02:33 UTC
On article Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR sample gallery (284 comments in total)
In reply to:

Edgar_in_Indy: Great photography, but that F2 performance is disappointing. Not at all what I expect from a modern prime lens. Are you sure the copy isn't a dud?

just shoot at F4 and beyond and your good.

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2017 at 02:24 UTC
Total: 193, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »