Astrotripper

IBIS on top Olympus cameras (E-M5 and E-M1 lines) is as good as OIS even at 200 and even 300mm. E-M10 has less effective stabilization, but not sure by how much. At shorter focal lengths it's not ...

No, because it bigger and heavier. Not sure what you mean, but some Panasonic lens features (like aperture ring and Dual IS) only work on Panasonic cameras.

Then you'll be happy to hear that IBIS on G80 was not state-of-the art even at that time :-)

I'd recommend PanaLeica 15mm f/1.7. Small, well built, high quality and very nice rendering. Olympus 17mm f/1.8 is also a very nice, compact lens if you'll get a good copy. Sigma might be nice ...

This effect has nothing to do with the camera or lens and is caused by turbulent air behind the subject. This is very common on hot sunny days. This is a common sight for people who try focusing ...

"Kind of a very expensive and laborious way to perpetrate a scam, no?"

Yes, those are the best scams. Nobody thinks anyone would put so much effort into one. See Theranos.

And when successful,...

So which ones?

I checked the specs for a few models here on DPR and they all are significantly bigger and heavier.

I have the exact same feelings. It does not feel "just right", like the E-M1 II. I expect with time I'll get used to the new layout, so I don't expect this to be a long standing issue. We often ...

All is good with mine.

I pre-ordered because I expected issues down the line. It was reasonable to assume OMDS would at least try to have enough inventory at launch, but if the demand remained high after initial hype ...

Yes, with all the consequences. Z9 actually has a crop mode so you can shoot it like that, no need for post processing. IMO, it's totally pointless unless this kind of use is an exception and not a ...

If you can do that, I'd highly recommend it. There's nothing better then getting the hands-on feel of the camera.

Sony with the kit zoom would not be much better, I'm afraid. That kit zoom is garbage, for starters. AF is definitely better than your old E-M10 and E-PL9 (even with that crappy kit lens). Not ...

And dead. If you want to get into a non-FF system that will accommodate your growth, you basically have two choices right now. Micro Four Thirds and Fuji. Why not Sony? They appear to have stopped ...

That's some lovely rendering right there. And the price is very reasonable considering how much Voigtlander is and how horrendous the rendering of Mitakon is.

Short story: (1) Fuji should be your pick if you want a serious APS-C system. (2) If you don't like Fuji, Sony might be a contender, but they ...

RAWDigger will show you unadjusted raw data, as this is what it was designed for. RawTherapee will not apply any noise reduction or sharpening unless you specify it. Same for Darktable, another ...

On a comparison that includes OM-1. Like this one: Note complete breakdown of color in JPEGs of E-M1 III. OM-1 even retains more details in JPEGs than Fuji or Nikon. Note massive color shift on ...

There is zero chance of that, I'm afraid. The new tracking modes rely heavily on new imaging processor and the new sensor. It was also the reason why E-M1 Mark III didn't get those modes while ...

I dare to disagree. It makes ISO settings above 3200 much more usable for a wider range of shooting scenarios. In previous models, really bad things were going on in shadows at ISO 6400 and ISO ...