ZapperDK

Joined on Aug 23, 2016

Comments

Total: 28, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

caravan: Meanwhile Sony delivers real products followered by announcements of price and dealers where said products are available.

Sony ... what is Sony doing here ?

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2020 at 13:21 UTC
In reply to:

Fly18: Some users here will say, FAIL, because it doesn’t have pet AF.

Could be that the man would have AF on a star 10,000 light years away so it hit the distance exactly

Link | Posted on Nov 5, 2019 at 20:17 UTC
In reply to:

mailman88: Is there an adapter to mount EF lens on the M6 II ?

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/883406-REG/Canon_6098b002_EF_M_Lens_Adapter_Kit.html

Link | Posted on Sep 7, 2019 at 10:06 UTC
On article Canon RF 85mm F1.2L USM sample gallery (463 comments in total)
In reply to:

ZeBebito: "...a lens that arguably doesn't yet have a proper camera to attach it to" LOL

Even as a Sony user (well, I have a Canon 5D which BTW takes great pics) I think you have taken your anti-Canon bias way too far.

If Canon had come up with a new high tech camera, everyone would write what they got with it, because there is only their 50 mm RF lens that is high tech, now they come with a good lens, so people are complaining about the opposite, what came first, the chicken or the egg.

Link | Posted on Jul 2, 2019 at 21:19 UTC
On article Canon RF 85mm F1.2L USM sample gallery (463 comments in total)
In reply to:

Battersea: "a lens that arguably doesn't yet have a proper camera to attach it to," most biased statement ever by DP Review .

If Canon had come up with a new high tech camera, everyone would write what they got with it, because there is only their 50 mm RF lens that is high tech, now they come with a good lens, so people are complaining about the opposite, what came first, the chicken or the egg.

Link | Posted on Jul 2, 2019 at 21:18 UTC
On article Canon RF 85mm F1.2L USM sample gallery (463 comments in total)
In reply to:

sobrien: "A lens that arguably doesn't yet have a proper camera to attach it to" is a pretty outrageous statement, to be fair.

The EOS R is certainly a proper camera and I would have said is a very solid performer when it comes to portraiture, at which this lens clearly excels, amongst other things.

As for the updated text, while it is less inflammatory to say "sensible camera", that is still a pretty derisory statement and seems unwarranted.

What exactly is not sensible about the EOS R for use with this lens?

Lack of IBIS? Because then there has never been a sensible Canon camera to use the EF 85mm f/1.2 and similar lenses.

Lack of heft? Well then use the battery grip.

Relatively cheap price of the EOS R? Maybe if they charged 5D mark iv prices it would be a sensible camera so...

Limited to 5FPS? For portraits?!

Honestly I am at a loss as to why dpreview would make this sweeping statement.

If Canon had come up with a new high tech camera, everyone would write what they got with it, because there is only their 50 mm RF lens that is high tech, now they come with a good lens, so people are complaining about the opposite, what came first, the chicken or the egg.

Link | Posted on Jul 2, 2019 at 21:18 UTC
On article Canon RF 85mm F1.2L USM sample gallery (463 comments in total)
In reply to:

Patlezinc: Thank you for editing, but... something is still weird. If the R is not the body for this lens, how can we conclude, like the last sentence says, that performances are stunning??? Perhaps because the R is totally able to handle this lens, no? Or it is not logical to me...
I never read comments saying that a GMaster mounted on a 24MP A7 III was something inadequate.

If Canon had come up with a new high tech camera, everyone would write what they got with it, because there is only their 50 mm RF lens that is high tech, now they come with a good lens, so people are complaining about the opposite, what came first, the chicken or the egg.

Link | Posted on Jul 2, 2019 at 21:17 UTC
On article Canon EOS RP review (1696 comments in total)
In reply to:

xpop: For a first owner without Canon history there is almost no lenses available, I own one and I must buy old EF lenses, lol

xpop All of this you knew before you bought your Canon RP so it only shows that there was nothing wrong with Canon but more with you

Link | Posted on Apr 8, 2019 at 22:11 UTC
On article Canon EOS RP review (1696 comments in total)
In reply to:

Full Stop: There is no need comparing this cam to other FF cameras.
The real competitors are the $1,000 APS-C cameras.
Photons to Photos shows that the RP has one stop less DR at ISO100
than Canon's own 24MPix APS-C sensor. (EOS 77D, ...)

Inevitable car analogy:
The RP is a medium-class car with an V8 engine with only 150HP.

HP indicates top speed and since most countries have speed limits, the torque is more important

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2019 at 11:35 UTC
On article Canon EOS RP review (1696 comments in total)

Considering this is a forum around Canon RP so it's fun that so many people have an opinion about one thing they have never had in hand and that is more about what "I" have.

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2019 at 10:42 UTC as 79th comment | 2 replies
On article Sony a7 III vs. Canon EOS R vs. Nikon Z6, which is best? (1235 comments in total)
In reply to:

ZapperDK: In email, you call it "Entry-level full frame mirrorless cameras compared." If it's fair, you should not use SONY a7 III but the first SONY full-frame mirrorless for you writes the "Entry level" It's not fair to compare 2 new with a 3 generation camera.

"Entry level" it is the lowest level in UK term.

Link | Posted on Dec 21, 2018 at 11:27 UTC
On article Canon EOS R review (3322 comments in total)
In reply to:

CanonBobert: Once again Canon under performs compared to the competition. And if the EOS R is merely a preview of what is to come (the Pro R for example), it's a pretty expensive preview, especially for what you don't get from it. I'm a Canon shooter with several bodies and lenses so I've stuck with it up until now but at some point I will get so fed up with Canon's lack of innovation that I will make the switch to Nikon or Sony--two companies that apparently do not take their users for granted. I'd love to hop aboard the mirrorless train, but I'm going to wait for the next one, and the next one may not have the Canon name on it.

If you look at SONY a7 first camera and their a7 lll there is a development that can be expected on Canon

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2018 at 13:33 UTC
On article Sony a7 III vs. Canon EOS R vs. Nikon Z6, which is best? (1235 comments in total)

In email, you call it "Entry-level full frame mirrorless cameras compared." If it's fair, you should not use SONY a7 III but the first SONY full-frame mirrorless for you writes the "Entry level" It's not fair to compare 2 new with a 3 generation camera.

Link | Posted on Dec 19, 2018 at 23:33 UTC as 44th comment | 4 replies
On article Canon EOS R review (3322 comments in total)
In reply to:

George Veltchev: How do you measure ergonomics and handling for example I wonder ? Question for DP Review specialists .. I played with both Sony A7III and Canon R and for me the Canon was much more easy to hold ... the build quality of the Canon also seems apparently far superior and yet in your chart they are almost on pair !!! ... How do you measure this in your chart ?
What is your reason to give a higher score to a complex menu which is close to disaster (A7III) in terms usability ?!

And then you do not think it's strange to write that the comparison is with Z6 that we do not know the score on. And it has not arrived yet !!!

Link | Posted on Nov 23, 2018 at 19:45 UTC
On article Canon EOS R review (3322 comments in total)
In reply to:

George Veltchev: How do you measure ergonomics and handling for example I wonder ? Question for DP Review specialists .. I played with both Sony A7III and Canon R and for me the Canon was much more easy to hold ... the build quality of the Canon also seems apparently far superior and yet in your chart they are almost on pair !!! ... How do you measure this in your chart ?
What is your reason to give a higher score to a complex menu which is close to disaster (A7III) in terms usability ?!

How can you compare with a camera that has not yet scored?

Link | Posted on Nov 22, 2018 at 13:17 UTC
On article Canon EOS R review (3322 comments in total)
In reply to:

George Veltchev: How do you measure ergonomics and handling for example I wonder ? Question for DP Review specialists .. I played with both Sony A7III and Canon R and for me the Canon was much more easy to hold ... the build quality of the Canon also seems apparently far superior and yet in your chart they are almost on pair !!! ... How do you measure this in your chart ?
What is your reason to give a higher score to a complex menu which is close to disaster (A7III) in terms usability ?!

Carey Rose...When you write that you compare with other cameras in the same group, there are not many full frames mirrorless, so when comparing, I would like to know which camera to compare with and let's get all names forward, remember when 3 should agree on what to write in the test then you need to agree on a text where one can write hard for unsweetened. Regarding scores, you'll be told that they are the same as giving scores to all the cameras.

Link | Posted on Nov 21, 2018 at 11:05 UTC
On article Canon EOS R review (3322 comments in total)
In reply to:

stepalex: Fair review and score.

Also, it makes it even clearer that Z7 should've gotten 85%.

When there are people who score, it can never be fair in everyone's eyes. Maybe only in the one that gives score

Link | Posted on Nov 20, 2018 at 16:02 UTC
On article Canon EOS R review (3322 comments in total)
In reply to:

George Veltchev: How do you measure ergonomics and handling for example I wonder ? Question for DP Review specialists .. I played with both Sony A7III and Canon R and for me the Canon was much more easy to hold ... the build quality of the Canon also seems apparently far superior and yet in your chart they are almost on pair !!! ... How do you measure this in your chart ?
What is your reason to give a higher score to a complex menu which is close to disaster (A7III) in terms usability ?!

The strange thing is that they are the same people who hand out scores for all tests, but there are different people who are testing. It is strange that those who score are not those who test.

Link | Posted on Nov 20, 2018 at 15:59 UTC
On article Canon EOS R review (3322 comments in total)
In reply to:

ZapperDK: Now the overall score is not awarded by the same person or people like the Nikon Z7 and the comparator the contest, you see differences depending on the individual person in this case Canon R and the people who rated the Nikon Z7. Battery life on the short side or Battery life is below average for the class. Now it's hard to say its class for who to compare. Nikon Z7 had 3 people in their review where Canon R had only one person. I do not intend to buy the Nikon Z7 or Canon R. But I do not like 2 cameras coming on the market from the 2 major manufacturers being rated with so different people.

We can agree that there are not the same people who have tested it because the articles speak 3 people about Z7 and only 1 person on R and you can see that the assessments in text are given differently so how can the score be? of the same persons. When you talk about comparisons between the same group, it's the brand new full frame from the 2 big ones. I can only see that there is a small difference in battery, but the layout is different in text and that means that those who make the score must make it from the person or persons who have tested them. Strange that the people making scores are not mentioned in the articles.

Link | Posted on Nov 20, 2018 at 11:02 UTC
On article Canon EOS R review (3322 comments in total)

Now the overall score is not awarded by the same person or people like the Nikon Z7 and the comparator the contest, you see differences depending on the individual person in this case Canon R and the people who rated the Nikon Z7. Battery life on the short side or Battery life is below average for the class. Now it's hard to say its class for who to compare. Nikon Z7 had 3 people in their review where Canon R had only one person. I do not intend to buy the Nikon Z7 or Canon R. But I do not like 2 cameras coming on the market from the 2 major manufacturers being rated with so different people.

Link | Posted on Nov 19, 2018 at 21:19 UTC as 263rd comment | 2 replies
Total: 28, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »