wy2lam

Joined on Jun 22, 2004
About me:

Voigtlander Bessa 66

Past cameras: Pentax Zoom90R, KX, Super Program, MZ-50, MZ-5

Past lenses: AI-s 300mm f/4.5 ED-IF, Tamron SP 17-35, Tamron 24-135 AF, Zenitar 16mm FE, Vivitar S1 200/3, Tokina RMC 70-210/3.5, Vivitar S1 70-210/2.8-4, SMCT 85/1.8, SMCT 50/1.4, K55/1.8, A50/1.4, FA80-320, Cosina 105/3.5, Sears 135/2.8, Jupiter 9 80/2, Kiron MC7 2x TC

Comments

Total: 82, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Reminds me of Ron Fricke movies...in other words, probably gonna be great.

Link | Posted on Jul 12, 2017 at 21:35 UTC as 30th comment
In reply to:

wy2lam: They missed one. The EI-2000. It technically is a reflex camera, just without a mirror...

Ah. It's in the other PDF file...just not in the 8.8MB one.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2017 at 15:31 UTC

They missed one. The EI-2000. It technically is a reflex camera, just without a mirror...

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2017 at 03:58 UTC as 26th comment | 2 replies
On article Sony FE 100mm F2.8 STF bokeh demystified (355 comments in total)
In reply to:

bdbender4: Looks like an interesting lens. How does Sony's approach compare to Fuji's in the 56mm f/1.2 R APD? Although that lens is for APS-C, a comparison would still be interesting.

while Sony's APD is like 4 or 5.6 in light gathering

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2017 at 19:53 UTC
On article Have your say: Best midrange ILC of 2016 (53 comments in total)

K-1 isn't midrange.

Link | Posted on Dec 8, 2016 at 14:23 UTC as 17th comment | 1 reply
On article Nikon Small World 2016 winners announced (18 comments in total)

the 3rd place picture....."20x"? Is there a typo?

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2016 at 12:45 UTC as 7th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Eric Calabros: iPhone killer? Are you joking? XL image is full of moire, oversharpening artifacts and horrible chroma noise everywhere. iPhone7 is softer but way cleaner, natural and WB is accurate.

@Eric Calabros

From the same comparison:
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr20_0=google_pixelxl&attr20_1=apple_iphone7&attr21_0=50&attr21_1=1173&attr22_0=daylight&attr22_1=daylight&attr26_0=raw&attr26_1=raw&attr293_1=wide&normalization=full&widget=423&x=-0.6028950410164042&y=0.25916869040339036

Do you still prefer what's on the right?

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2016 at 17:01 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 Review (2212 comments in total)
In reply to:

wed7: This review makes it even harder for me, I am looking either at Fujifilm XP2/XT2 or Pentax K-1. Oh well. =)

@wed7: there an be apple/orange comparisons. For example, on APS-C, a DA*55 or a DA70 is very comparable to the XF56 wen it cones to portraits. The FA77 on the K-1, too. They're all around the same ball park in terms of price.

For the XF16-50 and 50-140, I've had the DA*s before, and in fact hen I bought them the Pentax lenses were way cheaper too. Don't diss the new K-1 2.8 zooms just because it is made by Tamron - even third party lenses deliver a lot of goods. Plus Tamron is making the lense to Pentax specs and could be applying Pentax's coating, too? From samples I can find the IQ is excellent.

On my D700 I used to use a Sigma 24-60mm/2.8, a sub -$300 lense. For most of the pictures, I couldn't tell a difference between what it makes and what is made with a Nikkor 35-70/2.8.

I've been contemplating a K-1 too, but its weight is just too much. Will probably stick with an X-E2 for a while.

Link | Posted on Oct 22, 2016 at 20:42 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 Review (2212 comments in total)
In reply to:

wed7: This review makes it even harder for me, I am looking either at Fujifilm XP2/XT2 or Pentax K-1. Oh well. =)

Having owned Pentax, Nikon and now Fuji, I'm not sure about "Fuji glass generally beats out Pentax". At the same price point, the Pentax glass easily delivers the same IQ as the Fuji.

Link | Posted on Oct 21, 2016 at 18:01 UTC
On article Ballot-selfies are now legal in New Hampshire (50 comments in total)
In reply to:

GaryJP: Terrible mistake. Here in Hong Kong the pro-Beijing groups bribe people to vote for them and demand those people use their mobile phones to take photos of their ballot papers with the vote on.

I can see absolutely no reason why the desire for selfies every second trumps the need for free and fair elections.

Marty4650, refer to what Alex Permit says. The system became fair due to the move to secret ballots. If people are allowed to take selfies, it'll just be a matter of time parties demand proofs that supporters vote for who they promised, because in effect allowing selfies will allow a way to take away the secrecy.

Assuming what is happening in Hong Kong to never happen in America is both naïve and dangerous.

Link | Posted on Sep 30, 2016 at 12:33 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-E2S: What you need to know (85 comments in total)
In reply to:

maxnimo: The only issue I have with Fuji is those annoying film simulation modes that I have no use for. Why can't they have a normal, neutral, true to life, realistic mode that preserves true color, saturation and contrast? If I want a goofy, altered version of my photo I'll change it in post. I don't want to constantly think about which film simulation mode to use before every shot. Please give me a NORMAL mode so I won't have to mess with RAW all the time!

Try ProNeg Std. It's closer to "neutral, true to life" than more camera's "normal" mode anyway.

Link | Posted on Aug 17, 2016 at 16:27 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-E2S: What you need to know (85 comments in total)
In reply to:

KCook: "As a decidedly midrange experience being sold at something approaching a more entry-level price, the Fujifilm X-E2S deserves a look."

$1k is now considered an "entry-level" price??? Gawd, I need to find a different hobby.

Kelly

$1k with the excellent 18-55/2.8-4 included. Body-only it seems to hover around $700.

Link | Posted on Aug 17, 2016 at 16:23 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 Review (2212 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mateus1: I would like Sony to look at this beautiful photo machine with amazing control and fast access to any feature before it will bring another toy from A6xxxx line with poor control. Probably X-E3 will also be another Fuji gem if it gets same tech - joystick, front dial, etc. Sony APS-C line is aimed for video shooters only after Next-7 and no new lenses I think.

> MIke FL said
> Of course, the old Samsung NX1 is a better camera than any FUJI as far as I can see.

Well, that same old Samsung NX1 is also a better camera than any Sony APS-C series, and in many ways better than ANY Sony, as far as I can see.

Link | Posted on Aug 7, 2016 at 02:21 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 Review (2212 comments in total)
In reply to:

CosminMunteanu: A new boss in the mirrorless world :-) ...one can hardly ask more from it, Fujifilm did it again (and there are more to come, like the much expected 23mm f:2.o WR lens).
IBIS could be a good adition but, yet again, the world did not jump in the Pentax or Minolta (then Sony SLT) because they have IBIS (unlike Canikon) ;-)
Fuji's sensors (this 24 Mpx evem more) seems to hadle image noise better then other APS-C sensors (not to mention m4/3). True, in the real world this is not much of a difference and many times when the aperture jumps over f:5,6 towards f:11 even the out of focus areas (I mean DOF :-D ) of, a let say, 24 until 85 mm lens is less obvious while compared with a FF system.
All in all, Fujifilm has become the best APS-C sensor size mirrorless system.

@Androole

Of course. Using RAW I could use files from even a Coolpix 950 to accomplish the looks I want.

For those who enjoys spending less time with PP, a good JPEG engine will save a lot of time while producing very satisfactory results.

If RAW were the only thing serious photographers should use, all manufacturers should remove JPG output like Sigma did.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 18:24 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 Review (2212 comments in total)
In reply to:

jl_smith: So I did a short comparison between an X-T2 setup and a D750, since someone mentioned one could just buy a D750 for 'these prices'. Of course you cannot *DIRECTLY* compare FF and APS-C (insert equivalence blah blah blah) but I came close. Also, this is an older camera vs a new X-T2, so prices are skewed a bit.

For those curious - took the prices and stats from B&H:
D750 w/ 35mm f/1.8, 70-200 f/4, and 16-35
Price:$5017.85
Weight:2689g
bulk:215 in^3

X-T2 w/ 23/1.4, 50-140/2.8, 10-24
Price:$5096
Weight:2213
Bulk:162 in^3

So with the Fuji setup you pay 1.6% more in cost, for 82% of the weight and 75% of the bulk (volume) of the Nikon. Specs you all can compare for yourselves (video differences, OVF vs EVF, whatever).

Then there are the intangibles: control preferences, after-release support of camera, battery longevity, etc.

I prefer Fuji ;)
Others may prefer Nikon.

Good to have choices.

@Davinator of course you can. On the FF body, you'll need to always use ISO one stop higher to compensate. You'll end up with the exact same composition, subject distance, DOF, aperture and shutter speed.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 18:02 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 Review (2212 comments in total)
In reply to:

CosminMunteanu: A new boss in the mirrorless world :-) ...one can hardly ask more from it, Fujifilm did it again (and there are more to come, like the much expected 23mm f:2.o WR lens).
IBIS could be a good adition but, yet again, the world did not jump in the Pentax or Minolta (then Sony SLT) because they have IBIS (unlike Canikon) ;-)
Fuji's sensors (this 24 Mpx evem more) seems to hadle image noise better then other APS-C sensors (not to mention m4/3). True, in the real world this is not much of a difference and many times when the aperture jumps over f:5,6 towards f:11 even the out of focus areas (I mean DOF :-D ) of, a let say, 24 until 85 mm lens is less obvious while compared with a FF system.
All in all, Fujifilm has become the best APS-C sensor size mirrorless system.

gdbz

you want evidence?

http://romeobravophoto.zenfolio.com/blog/2016/6/skin-tone-test---sony-85mm-g-master-comparison-part-2

Then, no amount of evidence will convince someone who has already formed a conclusion.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 16:42 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 Review (2212 comments in total)
In reply to:

gbdz: Since you can buy yourself into a real ecosystem of lenses and whatever you might ever imagine you'd ever need in photography with the FF and APS DSLRs of Canon and Nikon and Sony, what exactly is the "raison d'etre" of this Fuji line of products?
As I've never touched one of these cameras, I do not understand.
Can you let me in on the secret, please?

saying that it is due to nostalgia alone or even largely, is very misleading and even derogatory.

to me it is the combination of solid build, engaging ergonomics, high quality lenses, and the Fujifilm rendition of colour that you cannot find anywhere else. That last point is important - shooting RAW+JPG will vastly minimize time spent on PP because half the time, the JPG is so good it is usable.

Of course the small size and perfect focus accuracy are part of the reason too, but it holds true for all mirror less, not just Fuji.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 16:28 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 Review (2212 comments in total)
In reply to:

Foosa dee cat: A tad over priced... was considering trading my XT-1 but, I'm keeping it or another year or so until the XT-2 goes on sale also the power booster grip wont be cheap either. I know I am the minority with this comment buy why cant they make cameras with out video? I'm interested in photography not video not movie making or any of that. I know I'm dreaming here but it would be nice to have a high end camera with out the video portion to make it more affordable for pure photographers....

it is a gross misunderstanding of how cameras nowadays if you think removing video will make things cost any less.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 14:33 UTC

Goodbye Apple

Link | Posted on Jul 2, 2016 at 15:46 UTC as 38th comment
In reply to:

heypek: to me fuji-customers have to wait two years to get their fuji-camera complete with things other Producers had alredy done long time ago... think!

Astroturfers at work? Go to the forum and look at real users. They don't seem to complain about the old firmware being broken.

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2016 at 13:03 UTC
Total: 82, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »