Alastair Norcross

As does the G7XII. You can engage it manually, or have it engage automatically (when there's too much light for the 1/2000 maximum shutter speed.

I have owned the Canon 7DII since it came out. I have also tried out the Nikon D500, and seen plenty of results from it. There is literally nothing about the D500 that would tempt me to trade my ...

Great shots. I also bought the original Digital Rebel with the 17-40L (and the 70-200 F4L). I loved the results from that combo.

I would like to see lens reviews focus only on performance. We're not idiots. We can factor the price into our own decisions. From what I can see, the EF-M 32 performs as well as or better than ...

I think they're pretty close in that range. I can't say I've noticed a difference. Since I got the 18-150 (purchased with my M6), I don't use the 18-55 anymore, but that's because I like having ...

What's Fv mode?

I have both the EF-M 11-22 and the EF-S 10-18. I would say the 11-22 is actually better than the 10-18, which is pretty good (especially for the price).

It's indistinguishable from the 80D, and a bit better than the 70D. The other differences between the cameras are far far more important. As is the case with pretty much every camera currently ...

I hear the Proclaimers have renamed themselves the “Pentaxians”. They have a new/old song out. Here’s the chorus: I would push three stops of shadows And I would push three shadow stops more Just ...

Which 50 F1.4 is both much cheaper than $479 and as good as this lens? The 32 F1.4 is actually a bargain. I used to own the 35 F1.4L, and the 32 is better. I paid three times as much for the 35L as...

Nice video. I’ve just viewed it full screen on an iPad Pro, and I have to confess I didn’t notice the noise. Perhaps my iPad does some kind of stealth noise reduction?

I use the same technique, and, like you, I bought the M with 18-55 and 22 on fire sale. The difference is that I used the 22 as my main lens from the start. Since I got the 32 F1.4, that has been ...

It is possible to do that quite a bit with LR too, using a mask. It's not as versatile as layers in PS, but a lot quicker and more convenient, if you're used to doing pretty much everything in LR. ...

False, and obviously so, otherwise there wouldn't be adapters. Maybe part of the point, but the whole point? Come on, at least think before you post.

So, buy the body only kit with the adapter for $1300, and add a 50 STM for another $100, and you have an actual kit that can take pictures for $1400. Or, if you must have an R mount lens, get the ...

Yes, as I said, that was for the 7D, not the 7DII.

He might have meant the 7D. That did get a major FW update about 3 years in. I don't think the 7DII has had any major updates, as opposed t bug fixes.

But how does it compare to using neither the speedbooster nor the extender? Using both pretty much cancels each other out in terms of focal length and light, so why not just use neither? Or don't ...

You’ve been using an extender and a focal reducer together? Why? Do you also put a humidifier and a dehumidifier in a room together, and let them fight it out?

Here's the link to the screen protector (the brand is Expert Shield): https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B018RN1NXO/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o04__o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1 It doesn't interfere with ...